Ont bien rebondi hier....belle victoire ....une équipe fière...à l'image de leur coach
...et MONTEMBEAULT a été brillant....mérite 2 autres départs....a besoin de bâtir une solide confiance....et qui sait???...l'ai toujours bien aimé.
Everything is just fine here there is very little drama or controversy, like goaltenders are stopping the puck, coaches/management have been excellent since their hiring and Caufield is playing phenomenal hockey on one of the best line in the NHL so far this season.Monty played great once again two nights ago. It makes me wonder why the french tv media constantly say that although he’s currently playing very well he’ll never be a #1 goalie in this league but has a good chance to be a #2 goalie on most teams. Don’t they realize that he’s partly the reason why the habs are currently a middle-of-the pack team just a few points away from being a playoffs team? Just because they got him for nothing off the waiver wire doesn’t mean shit! The great Dominik Hasek only reached greatness once he escaped Chicago. He was a nobody before he joined the Sabres & the same thing could be said about so many former great goaltenders who found their game once they matured and/or found new homes. Monty may turn out to be a diamond in the rough!
On another note some habs fans who have agreed to go with the rebuild should be worried right now when they see what’s happening in Ottawa & other places like Edmonton & Buffalo. Ottawa is still a bad hockey team & this was supposed to be the year they were finally back to being a playoff team. They suck. Edmonton may miss the playoffs again. Buffalo is back to playing like they did in the past after an encouraging start. I look at the habs & right now it looks like Martin St.Louis is running a country club. There is no accountability. Players are yuking it up at practice. It seems they only win when their goaltenders stand on their heads. Cole Caulfield is a goal scorer but often looks like he’s the biggest floater in the league & allergic to backchecking & smart defensive hockey. And when they do win games its often when veterans like Monahan & Hoffman are scoring. The young defencemen look promising but how promising can they be when David Savard is your best defenceman?
For the habs to have a better chance at contending again years from now & for the rebuild not end up being a bust like so many other teams they MUST figure out a way to absolutely end up drafting either first, second or third in the upcoming entry draft. Hopefully first overall. But it looks like it won’t happen & will likely end up missing the playoffs & draft somewhere outside the top 8. And can Martin St.Louis actually coach like a real NHL coach once the easy-going country club atmosphere needs to come to an end & fans expect to see resuls?
The Habs are certainly getting better value for the money being paid to their duo than the Leafs are from their duo. I really think we need to focus on some stats that measure production in ratio to the salary being paid for the production. In a salary capped league, all that matters is the bang you are getting for your buck. Suzuki/Caulfield are probably the highest production value in the league in as compared to the salary being paid for that production. If someone can identify a more cost efficient scoring duo in the NHL, name them. Maybe Hughes-Bratt on the Devils?Suzuki/Caufield > Marner/Matthews
Absolutely but, as @Doc Holliday pointed out, they are pretty useless in their own zone. They need to learn when and who to cover when defending.Suzuki/Caulfield are probably the highest production value in the league in as compared to the salary being paid for that production.
Uh…Marner plays with Tavares. Did you mean Nylander/Matthews?Suzuki/Caufield > Marner/Matthews
I really don’t see Nick Suzuki being useless in the D- zone, he’s very well rounded and plays with poise. Many hockey analysts are comparing him to a young Patrice Bergeron and I think personally that it’s a legit comparison, he’s getting close to Bergeron’s level.Absolutely but, as @Doc Holliday pointed out, they are pretty useless in their own zone. They need to learn when and who to cover when defending.
Uh…Marner plays with Tavares. Did you mean Nylander/Matthews?
Juste cette saison j'ai vu au moins 4 buts compter contre Mtl directement à cause de la mauvaise couverture de Suzuki. Cette année lui et Caufield file directement en zone neutre aussotôt qu'un défenseur a la rondelle, même quand il y a déjà un couvreur sur lui, ce qui laisse très peu d'option de passe. Il y a une raison pour laquelle Suzuki et Caufield, malgré une bonne fiche offensive, n'ont pas un gros différentiel dans les +/-. Si tu as 12 buts et 12 passes, mais un différentiel de +3 (Suzuki), et 12 buts et 9 passes, différentiel de 0 (Caufield), c'est parce que tu t'en fait scorer autant que tu en score.I really don’t see Nick Suzuki being useless in the D- zone, he’s very well rounded and plays with poise. Many hockey analysts are comparing him to a young Patrice Bergeron and I think personally that it’s a legit comparison, he’s getting close to Bergeron’s level.
For me i’d take Marchand & Pastrnak over Suzuki & Caulfield any time. The biggest problem i have with the habs duo is mostly with Caulfield. His skating is average & he’s allergic to backchecking. He reminds me more of a Brett Hull type who has a big shot & that’s about it. And because of his pint size I’m skeptic about his longevity in this league. Maybe that’s why Hughes is taking his time extending him. Bergevin would have already re-signed him to a $10 million contract. As for Suzuki i like his game more & more. But i still have trouble seeing him as a true #1 centre.No I meant I’m taking Nick n’ Cole in my team before Mitchell and Auston all day.
Bergeron-Pastrnak.If someone can identify a more cost efficient scoring duo in the NHL, name them. Maybe Hughes-Bratt on the Devils?
The 2 habs kids share a huge advantage over the existing top nhl duos: their youth. Suzuki is an amazing multi talented player already, he needs some polishing in his own zone but I'm not worried about his ability to learn quickly.For me i’d take Marchand & Pastrnak over Suzuki & Caulfield any time. The biggest problem i have with the habs duo is mostly with Caulfield. His skating is average & he’s allergic to backchecking. He reminds me more of a Brett Hull type who has a big shot & that’s about it. And because of his pint size I’m skeptic about his longevity in this league. Maybe that’s why Hughes is taking his time extending him. Bergevin would have already re-signed him to a $10 million contract. As for Suzuki i like his game more & more. But i still have trouble seeing him as a true #1 centre.
Marchand and Pastrnak… Who’s gonna take the faceoffs? For me Bergeron/Marchand might be the best duo in recent history I guess that’s why they formed the perfect storm with Sydney Crosby for Team Canada at the Olympics.For me i’d take Marchand & Pastrnak over Suzuki & Caulfield any time. The biggest problem i have with the habs duo is mostly with Caulfield. His skating is average & he’s allergic to backchecking. He reminds me more of a Brett Hull type who has a big shot & that’s about it. And because of his pint size I’m skeptic about his longevity in this league. Maybe that’s why Hughes is taking his time extending him. Bergevin would have already re-signed him to a $10 million contract. As for Suzuki i like his game more & more. But i still have trouble seeing him as a true #1 centre.
I’m also cool with either a Bergeron-Pastrnak or Bergeron-Marchand duo but Bergeron’s career is coming to an end so that’s why I initially left him out.Marchand and Pastrnak… Who’s gonna take the faceoffs? For me Bergeron/Marchand might be the best duo in recent history I guess that’s why they formed the perfect storm with Sydney Crosby for Team Canada at the Olympics.
Also the short guy that can’t skate, his name is Caufield.
He's played 98 nhl games, enough to have a clear idea of what he's able to do in the league. As for pint size player, well bring me a Martin Saint-Louis anytime, or a Theo Fleury, how about a Henri Richard? Marcel Dionne? Alex Debrincat, well the list can be long.As for the pint-sized American i’m not that big on him mostly because he still hasn’t played that much but mostly because i hate pint-sized hockey players.
98 games isn’t enough. Especially when the majority of those games don’t mean anything. Non-pressure games. Games mostly played within a country club atmosphere under a coach who doesn’t have a care in the world about defensive hockey.He's played 98 nhl games, enough to have a clear idea of what he's able to do in the league. As for pint size player, well bring me a Martin Saint-Louis anytime, or a Theo Fleury, how about a Henri Richard? Marcel Dionne? Alex Debrincat, well the list can be long.





