I doubt I'm the only one who feels a certain post was condescending, trumpeting misogyny, filled with bragging, and ultimately not even acknowledge that the comparison going on was demeaning as shit (and meant to be so). But I guess I'm the only one who will openly say it: Women aren't inanimate fucking objects. Comparing woman seriously to cars or wtv, whether a Sp or non Sp, is worse than thugs who go around lying to get someone into bed. It's fucking gross. People aren't items you buy and sell. How much money you choose to spend on prostitutes, or can, does not mean you're guaranteed a "better" experience. Actually, just because you can spend more does not mean you will be a better 'client' by default. Similarly, the higher rate does not mean an SP will be better across the board for every man or woman. ---
Anyhow, I think the higher the per hour price, the higher the beauty (or at least perceived) beauty of the Sp. That is to say, if you're charging 400 or 500 an hour in Montreal, it is because you look like a Supermodel. Beyond this, an Sp demanding such "higher prices" can presumably charm (for she is travelled) a room filled with "real mover and shakers". Madame 400/500 hr in Montreal is exclusive and selective because her prices make it such; she is what men with 'self-proclaimed statures of importance' (and money) are taught to crave. She is the perfect fantasy by design, by suggestion of peers or media, or just because she is that awesome. Also, she is usually really elegant and you probably you just have this sense that she is totally devoted/ into in your private moments together. Something like that.