How long will you wait?
- Thread starter Thor Jr
- Start date
Of course you wouldn’t blink an eye. You are doing it currently
For your question. If I found out now. I would be pissed and definitely would not see her after it was over. If I found out after the social distancing norms were reduced. Who knows. I guess we’ll find out then.
The minority of people are causing headaches for the majority by not respecting social distancing
I’m not perplexed by Willis’s answer. Not @ all.
To some it’s not about themselves, it’s about someone else. It goes to the question “who r u staying home for?” Who do you have in your life that you want to keep safe? He said it himself, he’s got kids. Other people have elderly relatives they gotta take care of. Others grand kids and for some it’s even about their fav SP’s.
I guess some people might find it tough to understand the whole non pharmaceutical measures the entire world is undertaking cause for them there’s no one but themselves?
To some it’s not about themselves, it’s about someone else. It goes to the question “who r u staying home for?” Who do you have in your life that you want to keep safe? He said it himself, he’s got kids. Other people have elderly relatives they gotta take care of. Others grand kids and for some it’s even about their fav SP’s.
I guess some people might find it tough to understand the whole non pharmaceutical measures the entire world is undertaking cause for them there’s no one but themselves?
Everyone should remember that there are risks at any age and there are still mysteries about this virus.
Immunity ? yes or no and for how long ?
The virus doesn`t just attack the lungs, but in some cases can trigger an auto immune reaction that makes your body attack healthy cells
It attacks the kidneys, liver and the brain causing damage that may not reveal itself for weeks, months or years.
There are just too many unknowns to feel safe for anyone in an attempted herd immunity scenario.
The only similarity between covid19 and a cold is a scary scenario indeed....that there may not be an effective vaccine and it may become seasonal and return every year .
What`s really scary are the world leaders and ordinary people who don`t believe the gravity of this plague . Like the autocratic dictator of Belarus who decreed that there is no covid19 and will arrest anyone who mentions those words.
Immunity ? yes or no and for how long ?
The virus doesn`t just attack the lungs, but in some cases can trigger an auto immune reaction that makes your body attack healthy cells
It attacks the kidneys, liver and the brain causing damage that may not reveal itself for weeks, months or years.
There are just too many unknowns to feel safe for anyone in an attempted herd immunity scenario.
The only similarity between covid19 and a cold is a scary scenario indeed....that there may not be an effective vaccine and it may become seasonal and return every year .
What`s really scary are the world leaders and ordinary people who don`t believe the gravity of this plague . Like the autocratic dictator of Belarus who decreed that there is no covid19 and will arrest anyone who mentions those words.
Funny ... isn't that what many are embracing - letting the minority rule and cause headaches instead for the majority ... take LGBTQXYZPDA stances on student locker room use for example .... fits your definition captured in quote. Trying to have it both ways?
If Mistral is banging the gong now ... good for him - he is keeping the economy afloat through an essential "service". If were in town - would be doing just that too with any of the Ups that are out and honing their craft!
Your comment contradicts your thoughts.
If you are pro lgbtq2+ ( educate yourself on how to properly word it). Then you are encouraging the headaches that a minority makes for a majority
Or you are against lgbtq2+ and thus are pro majority. So you agree with me that the minority is causing headaches for the majority. And in this case you are trying to have it both ways
Same with me, I will wait for Ned Lamont to tell me when. He has already said nothing before May 20.
I see different options which I consider to have different safety levels.
1- When the government says its safe to resume our normal routines. (Safe)
2- At least 14 days after the government says its safe to resume our normal routines which accounts for those who may be asymptomatic. (Very safe)
3- At least 14 days without a single new case of COVID-19 being reported which is more strict than just waiting for the government's go. (Extremely safe)
4- Wait until a vaccine has been used as much as flu short are being used in society. (Bulletproof safe)
I would personally prefer to wait long enough for option 3 to apply but I think society will be gradually forced back into "somewhat normal" based on option one. I mean, people can't refuse to go back to work once the government says so; they have bills to pay and the government probably can't withstand such economic pressure for a year either so they will try to restore economic activities as soon as they can while balancing that with an acceptable amount of health risks.
Problem is doing that will almost certainly make option 2 inapplicable and 3 impossible, new cases will arise if people mix up again like it happened in China when they tried to resume their routine and I think the government will tolerate that as long as the health system can cope.
As far as activities that are incompatible with social distancing are concerned which obviously includes the hobby, I will wait for either option 3 to somehow be applicable and if not I will wait for option 4.
1- When the government says its safe to resume our normal routines. (Safe)
2- At least 14 days after the government says its safe to resume our normal routines which accounts for those who may be asymptomatic. (Very safe)
3- At least 14 days without a single new case of COVID-19 being reported which is more strict than just waiting for the government's go. (Extremely safe)
4- Wait until a vaccine has been used as much as flu short are being used in society. (Bulletproof safe)
I would personally prefer to wait long enough for option 3 to apply but I think society will be gradually forced back into "somewhat normal" based on option one. I mean, people can't refuse to go back to work once the government says so; they have bills to pay and the government probably can't withstand such economic pressure for a year either so they will try to restore economic activities as soon as they can while balancing that with an acceptable amount of health risks.
Problem is doing that will almost certainly make option 2 inapplicable and 3 impossible, new cases will arise if people mix up again like it happened in China when they tried to resume their routine and I think the government will tolerate that as long as the health system can cope.
As far as activities that are incompatible with social distancing are concerned which obviously includes the hobby, I will wait for either option 3 to somehow be applicable and if not I will wait for option 4.
Interesting read. Shitty situation
https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/coronavirus/2020/4/19/1_4902772.html
https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/coronavirus/2020/4/19/1_4902772.html
I wanted to followup on social distancing.
The social distancing guidelines have several components. In addition to banning group social gatherings, keeping public distance, wearing masks, working from home, etc. most guidelines have provisions for limited individual contacts. These vary by country and region. One can treat the situation seriously without treating it like Armageddon.
It is incorrect to say that someone who sees another individual is not practicing any social distancing. Or is just thinking of themselves. You don't know what other things these people may be doing in consideration for others. Some of these views on people choosing to see another individual, especially single people, seem rather sanctimonious and lacking in respect for others.
The social distancing guidelines have several components. In addition to banning group social gatherings, keeping public distance, wearing masks, working from home, etc. most guidelines have provisions for limited individual contacts. These vary by country and region. One can treat the situation seriously without treating it like Armageddon.
It is incorrect to say that someone who sees another individual is not practicing any social distancing. Or is just thinking of themselves. You don't know what other things these people may be doing in consideration for others. Some of these views on people choosing to see another individual, especially single people, seem rather sanctimonious and lacking in respect for others.
She like the other SWs got a choice. Grocery stores, Wal-Mart, and security agencies have a huge demand for employees. Call centers also have a big demand. They can seek employment there in the meantime. I know the pay is nowhere near the same and they not free in the same way but for the moment there is no other choice.
You really believe their is a media conspiracy here? You think they are not reporting what Legault's team is saying? Last I heard they are the one taking these decisions.
Wasn’t Georgia’s governor the nit wit who said he didn’t know there was asymptomatic spread all the way in April, lol
I don't know TNB but if they open the border I am driving all the way down there to get an haircut!
Similar threads
