Why wasn't this one since it's filled with the same distorsions, exaggerations and revisionist history?
Can you give me some examples of this distortion and revisionist history that has been posted? Other than this one:
It is true that Montreal's economic situation was severely sabotaged by Anglo-Canadian resentment over French power in general and the 1976 PQ victory in particular. One need only think of Sun Life Assurance moving out under Galt's leadership.
.I'm fully aware that the separatist movement is largely responsible for shaping our cultural identity, for getting us out of our second class citizen status and for giving us the life and opportunities we have today
It's a pretty sad thing that the French community wasn't strong enough to stand up and achieve things for themselves and had to rely on separatists to do it. Actually it's more than sad, it's embarassing.
Then practice what you preach.
Bill 101 has been in force since 1977, get on with it, get a fucking life.
For one thing, 1977 isn't exactly ancient history and the language laws are still in force today. Another thing is that I am not looking for revenge on anyone. I would like to see everyone be treated the same and have equal rights under the law. To be treated like a second class citizen is one thing, to have it enshrined in law is something else altogether.
I have stated it before and I'll do it again...I have no problem with laws to promote and preserve the French language in Quebec. I do have a problem when the promotion and protection is used as an excuse to attack and eradicate the English language or any other. And in case you haven't noticed, it hasn't achieved, and will never achieve, that end.
Oh yeah...I also have a problem with people who try to destroy my country. I'm funny that way.