Robert McInnis
EagerBeaver said:
Eastender,
Unless you are an LE operative or a FS SC operative, I would say it is a tad presumptuous of you to be predicting LE activity in the aftermath of this JDM article. If you are either of the above, on the other hand, your body of posts in this thread are nothing more than a ruse. If the LE activity is so predictable, then the picture Oliver has drawn of the donut munching moron is rather accurate.
Let me supply you with a direct quote from my and Oliver's source. In the JDM article, the provincial police are reportedly quoted as knowing nothing about what is reportedly going on. My source said to me: "only Schultz (character in the 1960s TV series "Hogan's Heroes") knows nothing." You may recall Schultz as the dumbkopf nazi soldier whose famous line, "I know nothing!", was the reality because he was too stupid to figure out the obvious. Schultz ate quite a few donuts, by the ways.
The quotes you seem to be refering to are the
ones made by police officer Ronald McInnis of
the SQ in the JDM on Saturday.Unfortunately
the author of the article does not identify the
officer's role - is the officer a spokesperson for
the SQ(more than likely) or an actual member
of the SQ morality squad(doubtful since they
are undercover)? Everyone would have a better
understanding of the answers if this detail would
have been included as is the norm in most police
stories.
Furthermore route 112 passes through municipal
and provincial jurisdiction and in the story it is
not clear which jurisdiction is responsible for each
club.
I did not predict - I gave a historic perspective.
You should know the difference.If I were to
list all the 6/49 results since the beginning with a
breakdown for each of the 49 numbers I would not
be predicting - just providing data that readers
could interpret as they see fit.
Conversely I played junior football in the late 1960's
early 1970's.On any forward pass there are three
possibilities excluding penalties - complete,incomplete
or interception.To reach such a conclusion I do not
have to be playing today nor would it imply that
I am a CFL or NFL operative(owner/coach/gm,referee).
Previously you have made assumptions about me
that have been proven false - if you start with a
false assumption as you did above mistaking a historic
overview for a prediction then you could deduce any
lunacy and it would still be false.
Your analogy re SGT Schultz is interesting given
that his superior COL. KLINK thought he new
everything and would get proven wrong every show.
Now EB you were wrong about my abilities in French.
You cannot tell the difference between predicting
and a historic overview.You deduce conclusions
based on false assumptions.Are you morphing into
COL KLINK? The glasses look very similar.