Hello People,
...its been silence from some of the old time members like Iggy...
Mike, you'd need an industrial strength vice grip to squeeze every one of his nearly 9,000 posts to get one review out of him, unless you count those cozy one-liner posts or his admiration for Joe.t. They and others have gone almost completely back channel with their escort information, and that's a cheat for the board that has gotten to be a bigger and bigger habit.
Regarding criticism:
Some of those so-called criticisms are attack replies where the responder poses like he was actually there to see what went on and contradicts what the reviewer says happened. Some of these are just pure shill attacks, and they are easy to spot because the attacker acts like he was the one reviewing from a completely different experience.
One of the most terrible cases of attack replies to reviews involves a great guy like Cloudsurf. It's bad enough members attack reviews that are critical of their favorite ladies or agencies, but going after Cloudsurf because he's allegedly always positive? What the hell is that about? Are these attackers just so miserable that they have to attack someone who knows how to enjoy his experiences. It's ridiculous.
A lot of members act like their own experience must be true for everyone, so they attack anything different. I never understood why anyone had to insist what they did with a lady had to be true about her for all or presume something nasty was true about the reviewer. We admit that chemistry is a very real and powerful factor, then some of the same people act like there's no such thing.
There's another odd bad habit. A close associate of mine, one of the most respect reviewers ever who posted his famous A-List, would get inquiring PMs, which is fine. But not satisfied with the answers some who try to get very personal information that became badgering and maybe very close to stalking. Of course it's alright to ask about details of an encounter with a lady, but keep your space. Getting some helpful detail is not an invitation to try to become part of anyone's personal life, especially not pushing for that.
...the best way to do a review is post all physical descriptions like hair color, breasts, body type, tattoos and piercings and language skills in French and English,...
This seems very reasonable, but where's the difference between this information and what every short bio list on an agency website tells us. Too many details an unnecessary, but why not something like: The lady arrived dressed in a silk dress with stocking and high heels...she showed me she enjoyed kissing sensually...she was comfortable being in several positions for sex. I don't think that's going to far or guaranteeing anything for objectionable clients. It's a lot better than putting the lady on the spot for CIM, SW, greek and more.
Do the police would really try to link our profiles to us...
It would seem to be a very doubtful effort for the police to gain good evidence or proof, especially on out of towners. However, the more one is closely associated with an agency and has left his "finger prints" there would be what not to have laying around. It shouldn't affect reviews much, except that many might worry more than they should. People have a habit of overreacting, but in this case where the stakes are higher in their personal lives as well as any possible legal consequences being scared is natural.
I don't agree with EB's criticism of how people review: for me, any review contains something useful.
Complaining that people's review are not to your taste will only lead to less reviews, which goes against the point of this board, doesn't it?
People complain about style and the type of content like rating systems then give others a hard time about that instead of appreciating the effort. I don't ses any room for criticism on these grounds. They should be grateful when people take the time to write publicly. If you need clarity about certain details that concern you then send a PM. Most like me are happy to give a little more information or clear up a misunderstanding.
...I don't want to be drawn into the whole 'was it worth it for that much cash?" debate.
Well, there are times when this is annoying and other times when it can be a service. Questioning value can put the lady and agency on notice that while they are doing well there is a limit on the rates in this market. This is one of the things I find disturbing about all the disingenuous attacks on critical reviews. It's stifling a critical element that helps control inflation and keep value at rational levels.
The one thing I like about the TER review system is that with one click you see all the reviews the member ever posted.
One of the best assets any escort review board can have that is missing here is a function that would allow members to quickly see a review history for a member. I've seen and used TER in this way for Boston in the past and it was very helpful.
The other big problem here is that when I enter a name to search I get a ridiculous hodgepodge of totally unrelated topics, some without even the faintest resemblance to anything about an escort or an agency. It's really stupefying how that issue has not been addressed. Even precise keywords in titles I know 100% are there don't come up at times.
I second that...if you dont like my english...dont fuc**** read me!!!!... Si tu aime pas mon québécois parlé ..ne me lis pas calice non plus ...POINT!!! If you are not down with it...take the highway!!!
Français est la plus belle langue du monde. Italienne est deuxième. J'aimerais parler parfaitement le français, mais je sais seulement un peu.
Ne vous inquiétez pas EB. Il "pense" qu'il est le centre de l'univers de chacun. :lol: Tout le meilleur pour vous.
Bonne journee',
Merlot
