MSC photos

[wolfie7]

Is it just me? I find the watermarks / labels on the MSC photos totally distracting. I get it she doesn't want these photos to be used elsewhere, but crap, there's a reason no one else does that. I've seen a lot of good reviews about Jessy's agency, and some of her girls look great, BUT somehow, those diagonal strips of words down the pictures of her girls just distract me to the point where I can't focus on what's behind them, and I just give up. Maybe some of the girls look great, but I associate the bad stripes with them (???).

Does anyone else have that problem? Or is my eyes-to-brain connection totally fucked up?

The MERB ads also don't have enough information in them, forcing you to go to the website. Which is not ideal for mobile.

Can we get a MERB petition to get rid of those damn watermarks??

Then again, do I really need another agency?...

 

[johnybird]

The pictures have watermarks on them? I hadn't noticed.

 

[BookerL]

The pictures have watermarks on them? I hadn't noticed.

Well johny you have has good of a eye sight as I do ,notice what ?


Cheers


Booker
c

 

[wolfie7]

It's not a watermark. But it's the website and phone number in grey across the photo. Is it my browser???

 

[johnybird]

those diagonal strips of words down the pictures of her girls just distract me to the point where I can't focus on what's behind them, and I just give up.

See I see it the other way, The pictures of the girls distract me to the point where I can't focus on the diagonal bars or watermarks or logos in front of them. Kind of like those autostereogram's :thumb:

There's nothing wrong with your browser wolfie, just adjust what you're focusing on

 

[lovelegs]

La qualité des photos est inversement proportionnel à la qualité de l'agence et de ses filles.

Dommage.

LL

 

[lgna69xxx]

No Wolfie, it is not just you. I feel to much writing across the photo takes away from the lady and is quite annoying but I also appreciate why MSC does this for their girls and the success rate that Miss Jessy has had over the years speaks for itself so what do I know.

Personally to moi as to what makes a great picture in this business is just being real and if you have hot ladies then going the natural route is the way to go, no heavy photoshop needed. Eleganza was the master at this back in their day and today i feel GoodGirls does this as good as anyone although I would love to see different backgrounds, props and better lighting from time to time. If words are needed across the front of a picture then i like how Asservissante and Xxxtase do it with very light wording and just one line of it, minus the moderate to heavy photoshopping.

I want the girl in the actual picture to arrive at my door not the one that looks too good to be true in a photoshopped picture that usually is not as hot in person. Don't get me wrong, sometimes (depending on the agency) the girl is almost as hot as her heavily enhanced pic but with natural pictures you pretty much are never disappointed each and every time.

 

[charmer_]

The watermarks are a bit too much....I understand the reason for them, but it's very distracting and detracts from the beauty of the girls. Maybe something a bit more transparent and flat?

 

[lgna69xxx]

Charmer, that is why i mentioned Asservissante and Xxxtase's pics. Take a look and see. Not very distracting at all the way they do it with the light colored wording and just the one line of it.

 

[Handi]

I feel the same way. Msc websites/pictures just doesnt give me the wow effect that would make me call them. I read a lot of good revies on their girls, but pictures never tempted me. Also, the pictures should be bigger, i feel like i cant "size" the girls enough...

 

[lougazebo]

Personnelement , Je n'ai jamais été tenté de faire affaire avec MSC, principalement a cause de leurs photos qui me donne aucune idée claire de l'apparence des filles, je n'arrive pas a faire le focus sur la fille, ca me distrait toute ce superflus.

 

[Mrloco]

I found it very annoying and distracting but anyways their girls are hot and pictures are accurate

 

[hungry101]

no heavy photoshop needed. Eleganza was the master at this back in their day and today i feel GoodGirls does this as good as anyone although I would love to see different backgrounds, props and better lighting from time to time. If words are needed across the front of a picture then i like how Asservissante and Xxxtase do it with very light wording and just one line of it, minus the moderate to heavy photoshopping.

I want the girl in the actual picture to arrive at my door not the one that looks too good to be true in a photoshopped picture that usually is not as hot in person. Don't get me wrong, sometimes (depending on the agency) the girl is almost as hot as her heavily enhanced pic but with natural pictures you pretty much are never disappointed each and every time.

Amen brother Igmen! It is so critical that the girl that arrives at the door does not look less desirable than her pictures on the site. There is a delicate balance that the agencies have to consider. Photoshop too much (and you may have to do this to protect the identity) and you run the risk of disappointing a customer. I have noticed that when a GoodGirl arrives at my door they have always looked as good or better than their pictures. This was also true of Eleganza.

My pet peeve is that I can't get the girl to arrive in the sexy lingerie they posed for in the pictures. I noticed that last time I met was Christina she wore the same stockings as in her pictures. I like that. Don't show the girl wearing sexy lingerie and have her show up in a pair of jeans and tennis shoes.

One more thing. I believe that Mojo has raised the bar. They show the face in many pictures, they show tattoos as they are and they have added a video which I believe is much more difficult to photoshop or use fake pictures.

 

[lgna69xxx]

Well Hungry, what the sp wears is pretty much up to her but I suggest you request a certain lingerie or outfit ahead of time, I suppose more and more ladies might be dressing down because of the new laws but could always bring something to change into if you request it I guess.

 

[BookerL]

I am wondering do I prefer watermarks or mirror reflections with smartphones ?



Regards




Booker

 

[hungry101]

Well Hungry, what the sp wears is pretty much up to her but I suggest you request a certain lingerie or outfit ahead of time, I suppose more and more ladies might be dressing down because of the new laws but could always bring something to change into if you request it I guess.

IDK Iggy. An agency out to have some standards. I remember years ago that Devilish or maybe it was Eleganza had a dress sexy policy. The girl arrived dressed like she was going out for the evening. To me this is no more conspicuous than dressing down. In fact, I could argue that this is less conspicuous because the girls look like they are business travelers or someone in town to attend a wedding etc. with a long dress coat in the winter.

And yes, I think calling ahead and making a request for lingerie etc. is a good idea.

 

[charmer_]

I agree with some of the comments about the bad quality of the pics themselves. The watermarks aren't the only problem MSC is having with their photos. Girls4U pics are nothing special, but they're way better in quality than the pics on MSC's website.

And speaking of websites....you could make an argument of how outdated MSC's website is altogether. It looks like a website created in the late 90s that hasn't been upgraded since!

I'm sure they've got some excellent looking women in their roster, but their website isn't doing any favours. They definitely need to make some changes (starting with their photos).

 

[Merlot]

Gentlemen,

I just took a look because I'm surprised at the comments and I thought something had changed. The text over the photos are annoying, but the photos underneath are otherwise high quality without the marks and they have a very nice variation in poses to give the viewer a very good idea of what each lady looks like. That alone could teach something to some other sites. As for the general look of the website, it's sharp, clean, and easy to use. The style may not be to everyone's tastes, but what website is. Get rid of most of the text and there's nothing to complain about.

Overall I'd say B to B+ for MSC, clean out the text and it goes up from there.

:thumb:

Merlot

 

[centaurus]

Glad to hear I am not the only annoyed by the pictures. But in hindsight , I never book a lady just based on her pix. I book her mainly based on her reviews. Jessy should ease up on the watermarks. One is more than adequate.

 

[hungry101]

Wow! The Watermarks are abundant are they not? Jessey must be sick and tired of fakes stealing her photos. You still get a good idea though.