Open Letter: Discrimination Has No Place in This Industry

[Handi]

To the Montreal escort community,

It’s time we talk about something deeply shameful — and no, I’m not talking about kink or taboo. I’m talking about blatant discrimination against people living with disabilities.

Recently, it came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities. No nuance. No case-by-case. Just a cold, flat-out refusal — as if being disabled disqualifies someone from intimacy, pleasure, or even basic human respect.

Let me be crystal clear: this is dehumanizing, discriminatory, and completely unacceptable.

We live in 2025 — in a city that prides itself on openness, inclusion, and care for others. For any agency, especially one that profits from providing companionship and connection, to deliberately shut the door on a whole population of people is not only cruel — it’s hypocritical.

Being disabled doesn’t make someone less deserving of touch, intimacy, or dignity. What it does mean is that they often face countless extra barriers — physical, social, emotional — just to access what many of us take for granted. And now they’re being denied again, by those who should understand the value of connection better than anyone?

Shame on Euphoria.

And shame on all of us if we let this slide in silence.

To the community — clients, companions, and agencies alike — if you agree that people living with disabilities deserve respect, boycott Euphoria starting now. Don’t support a business that chooses exclusion over compassion. There are plenty of agencies and independents who treat all people with dignity — let’s uplift them instead.

To other agencies: do better. Make your services accessible. Educate yourselves. Build policies rooted in inclusion, not ignorance.

To everyone else: speak up. Ask hard questions. Let Euphoria know this is not okay. Let others know we expect more from this industry — and we’re done tolerating discrimination.

Because if your business is built on connection, but you can’t see the humanity in someone with a disability, then what are you really selling?

Enough is enough.


— An advocate who refuses to stay silent

 

[Michelle Gunn]

welp, I had no idea and now I feel sick.

I guess it's yet another reason to hire an independent.

I would plug a website but since it's run by volunteers there's no marketing budget.

 

[Lans]

To the Montreal escort community,

It’s time we talk about something deeply shameful — and no, I’m not talking about kink or taboo. I’m talking about blatant discrimination against people living with disabilities.

Recently, it came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities. No nuance. No case-by-case. Just a cold, flat-out refusal — as if being disabled disqualifies someone from intimacy, pleasure, or even basic human respect.

Let me be crystal clear: this is dehumanizing, discriminatory, and completely unacceptable.

We live in 2025 — in a city that prides itself on openness, inclusion, and care for others. For any agency, especially one that profits from providing companionship and connection, to deliberately shut the door on a whole population of people is not only cruel — it’s hypocritical.

Being disabled doesn’t make someone less deserving of touch, intimacy, or dignity. What it does mean is that they often face countless extra barriers — physical, social, emotional — just to access what many of us take for granted. And now they’re being denied again, by those who should understand the value of connection better than anyone?

Shame on Euphoria.

And shame on all of us if we let this slide in silence.

To the community — clients, companions, and agencies alike — if you agree that people living with disabilities deserve respect, boycott Euphoria starting now. Don’t support a business that chooses exclusion over compassion. There are plenty of agencies and independents who treat all people with dignity — let’s uplift them instead.

To other agencies: do better. Make your services accessible. Educate yourselves. Build policies rooted in inclusion, not ignorance.

To everyone else: speak up. Ask hard questions. Let Euphoria know this is not okay. Let others know we expect more from this industry — and we’re done tolerating discrimination.

Because if your business is built on connection, but you can’t see the humanity in someone with a disability, then what are you really selling?

Enough is enough.


— An advocate who refuses to stay silent

maybe more details on what happened? what disability? Was it you or someone you know? what was their answer? more info and less bashing plz. I have been using Euphoria for many years and will continue. Maybe indys can receive client with disabilities. No point hating on those who dont and getting overdramatic like that.

 

[Lunaseraphim]

To the Montreal escort community,

It’s time we talk about something deeply shameful — and no, I’m not talking about kink or taboo. I’m talking about blatant discrimination against people living with disabilities.

Recently, it came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities. No nuance. No case-by-case. Just a cold, flat-out refusal — as if being disabled disqualifies someone from intimacy, pleasure, or even basic human respect.

Let me be crystal clear: this is dehumanizing, discriminatory, and completely unacceptable.

We live in 2025 — in a city that prides itself on openness, inclusion, and care for others. For any agency, especially one that profits from providing companionship and connection, to deliberately shut the door on a whole population of people is not only cruel — it’s hypocritical.

Being disabled doesn’t make someone less deserving of touch, intimacy, or dignity. What it does mean is that they often face countless extra barriers — physical, social, emotional — just to access what many of us take for granted. And now they’re being denied again, by those who should understand the value of connection better than anyone?

Shame on Euphoria.

And shame on all of us if we let this slide in silence.

To the community — clients, companions, and agencies alike — if you agree that people living with disabilities deserve respect, boycott Euphoria starting now. Don’t support a business that chooses exclusion over compassion. There are plenty of agencies and independents who treat all people with dignity — let’s uplift them instead.

To other agencies: do better. Make your services accessible. Educate yourselves. Build policies rooted in inclusion, not ignorance.

To everyone else: speak up. Ask hard questions. Let Euphoria know this is not okay. Let others know we expect more from this industry — and we’re done tolerating discrimination.

Because if your business is built on connection, but you can’t see the humanity in someone with a disability, then what are you really selling?

Enough is enough.


— An advocate who refuses to stay silent

I'm popping back in for a short moment of time, because this is a subject of interest to me..

Have you ever asked the agency bookers working for Euphoria why they are refusing to provide services for disabled individuals? If so, what was the response? I'm a disability and mental health advocate as well and I'm wondering if it's because the providers working for certain agencies don't have the expertise to see clients who have different needs.. This is kind of unrelated but for example I'm a trauma and neurodivergence and mental health informed companion, but it's not the case for everyone and certain workers might not have the knowledge to handle certain situations, and I can see how booking someone who's not and has one or more than one of these struggles might not be able to offer a safe space for the client. And that's okay, because somebody else will be able to. Same with more physical disabilities and chronic illnesses.

I also second reaching out to independent providers.

By the way please don't assume I'm implying that this isn't discrimination because flat out refusing without giving an explanation or the explanation being mediocre is absolutely discrimination! But let's face a lot of establishments in the sex industry mostly have profit in mind and don't necessarily care about inclusivity and how to make more marginalized clients and providers feel more welcome...

 

[Lunaseraphim]

It seems the OP was under drug effects or something like this.

I think this post is very clear and well written so I'm not sure from what basis you're making that conclusion

 

[Handi]

I'm popping back in for a short moment of time, because this is a subject of interest to me..

Have you ever asked the agency bookers working for Euphoria why they are refusing to provide services for disabled individuals? If so, what was the response? I'm a disability and mental health advocate as well and I'm wondering if it's because the providers working for certain agencies don't have the expertise to see clients who have different needs.. This is kind of unrelated but for example I'm a trauma and neurodivergence and mental health informed companion, but it's not the case for everyone and certain workers might not have the knowledge to handle certain situations, and I can see how booking someone who's not and has one or more than one of these struggles might not be able to offer a safe space for the client. And that's okay, because somebody else will be able to. Same with more physical disabilities and chronic illnesses.

I also second reaching out to independent providers.

By the way please don't assume I'm implying that this isn't discrimination because flat out refusing without giving an explanation or the explanation being mediocre is absolutely discrimination! But let's face a lot of establishments in the sex industry mostly have profit in mind and don't necessarily care about inclusivity and how to make more marginalized clients and providers feel more welcome...

The booker just said « its too complicated book elsewhere »

 

[puss1985]

More context is required. I can sense emotions without much detail. It’s challenging to condemn something solely based on emotions. Others might perceive its competitors attacking

 

[What's My Name]

I am handicapped, below knee amputation. I am glad I don't deal with agencies, I used them for a very dhort moment and hated it because I would ask the booker my situation and they said all was good, get to the location and the nlady was never informed and was very freaked out. Hence today I use only Indy ladies and rarely have had any issues. Since the new year of 2025 I have written to some Indy ladies and got nothing back. I can understand sometimes not all the ladies are not combfortable with handicapped people, however a reply back saying you are not combfortable would appreciated.

 

[Handi]

More context? Here it is. Imagine being treated like a burden before you even speak. Imagine being excluded from basic human connection—not because you can’t afford it, not because you were disrespectful—but simply because you move through the world differently. That’s the reality for people with disabilities every single day.

Now imagine being told by a business — whose entire purpose is to offer intimacy and companionship — that your body disqualifies you from being worthy of their time. That no matter who you are, how kind, how generous, how respectful — your wheelchair, your condition, your label makes you unserviceable. That’s not just ‘business policy’. That’s systemic, internalized ableism.

It’s not ‘emotional’ to call out injustice. It’s emotional to live it. To be turned down again and again because of something you didn’t choose. If that doesn’t bother you, the problem isn’t my tone — it’s your humanity.

So yes — I’m emotional. Because it’s dehumanizing. Because it’s wrong. And because if you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.

 

[Lans]

I am handicapped, below knee amputation. I am glad I don't deal with agencies, I used them for a very dhort moment and hated it because I would ask the booker my situation and they said all was good, get to the location and the nlady was never informed and was very freaked out. Hence today I use only Indy ladies and rarely have had any issues. Since the new year of 2025 I have written to some Indy ladies and got nothing back. I can understand sometimes not all the ladies are not combfortable with handicapped people, however a reply back saying you are not combfortable would appreciated.

Thx for sharing. A lot of Indys dont answer back. Dont take it too personal. A girl send me a sexy picture of her in the pool a few days ago. I asked her when she is available. No answer yet.

And for agency girls, they are usually younger, less experienced than indys. It's not really discrimination if they freak-out. Just the lack of experience.

May I suggest Sonia von Sacher. She will make you walk again

 

[CLOUD 500]

This comes back to the same type of context of girls who do not want to see gentlemen from a certain race. I do not think agencies are equiped to deal with disabled clients and not all girls are comfortable in serving a disabled client. Disabilities is a broad term and can apply to various things. Indy would be the best route because in this situation you need more personalized communication and deal with the lady directly to discuss. I can see the frustration of the OP, but remember no girl has to serve you, it is ultimately her choice.

 

[Handi]

This comes back to the same type of context of girls who do not want to see gentlemen from a certain race. I do not think agencies are equiped to deal with disabled clients and not all girls are comfortable in serving a disabled client. Disabilities is a broad term and can apply to various things. Indy would be the best route because in this situation you need more personalized communication and deal with the lady directly to discuss. I can see the frustration of the OP, but remember no girl has to serve you, it is ultimately her choice.

I hear you — but this isn’t about individual comfort. It’s about a systemic refusal to even consider disabled clients, regardless of context. That’s not caution — it’s exclusion.

“Not equipped” isn’t an excuse in 2025. Agencies manage risk, safety, and logistics every day. Why is accessibility where they draw the line?

Disabled people shouldn’t have to navigate everything alone just because the industry chooses not to evolve. This isn’t about special treatment — it’s about basic humanity.

We can do better. And we should.

 

[skarsga]

in an ideal world perhaps.
Realistically this industry operates in a legal/moral gray zone
These are not government offices that have to practice inclusion

 

[minutemenX]

To the Montreal escort community,

It’s time we talk about something deeply shameful — and no, I’m not talking about kink or taboo. I’m talking about blatant discrimination against people living with disabilities.

Recently, it came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities. No nuance. No case-by-case. Just a cold, flat-out refusal — as if being disabled disqualifies someone from intimacy, pleasure, or even basic human respect.

Let me be crystal clear: this is dehumanizing, discriminatory, and completely unacceptable.

We live in 2025 — in a city that prides itself on openness, inclusion, and care for others. For any agency, especially one that profits from providing companionship and connection, to deliberately shut the door on a whole population of people is not only cruel — it’s hypocritical.

Being disabled doesn’t make someone less deserving of touch, intimacy, or dignity. What it does mean is that they often face countless extra barriers — physical, social, emotional — just to access what many of us take for granted. And now they’re being denied again, by those who should understand the value of connection better than anyone?

Shame on Euphoria.

And shame on all of us if we let this slide in silence.

To the community — clients, companions, and agencies alike — if you agree that people living with disabilities deserve respect, boycott Euphoria starting now. Don’t support a business that chooses exclusion over compassion. There are plenty of agencies and independents who treat all people with dignity — let’s uplift them instead.

To other agencies: do better. Make your services accessible. Educate yourselves. Build policies rooted in inclusion, not ignorance.

To everyone else: speak up. Ask hard questions. Let Euphoria know this is not okay. Let others know we expect more from this industry — and we’re done tolerating discrimination.

Because if your business is built on connection, but you can’t see the humanity in someone with a disability, then what are you really selling?

Enough is enough.


— An advocate who refuses to stay silent

This is not right. You can always find indies that not only are willing to accommodate people with disabilities but consider it as a social service. And I commend these ladies. It is a very humanistic thing to do. But to demand a uniform acceptance from 20+ year old agency girls is absurd.

 

[Michelle Gunn]

This is not right. You can always find indies that not only are willing to accommodate people with disabilities but consider it as a social service. And I commend these ladies. It is a very humanistic thing to do. But to demand a uniform acceptance from 20+ year old agency girls is absurd.

No one demanded uniform acceptance from anyone, the agency in question just flat out refused to serve a specific contingent of the population.

Sucking dick (etc) is just sucking dick whether it's attached to a person with a fully functional body or not, I don't need to be commended for it. lol

 

[GreyPilgrim]

Even if their incall locations had perfect accessibility…
Or even if they actually did allow outcalls to your location…
I believe your situation would still lead some agencies to turn you down for no better reason than "too much hassle, don’t wanna deal with it".

Unfair? Absolutely. Sad? Yeah. Infuriating? I bet!
My advice? Vote with your wallet. Oh, and I strongly, strongly second Lans’ suggestion!

 

[minutemenX]

Sucking dick (etc) is just sucking dick whether it's attached to a person with a fully functional body or not, I don't need to be commended for it. lol

Such attitude requires a certain degree of “maturity” in this profession that 20 year old agency girls often do not have.

 

[Euphoria Girls]

Hello Everyone,

I am not one that loves to get involved with these online debates where no matter what is said on sensitive topics like this, there will be a percentage that will want to accuse of discrimination, racism, evil practices or what have you, but in this case I have to interject because it is complete hogwash what this original poster is saying.

He says it, "It came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities".

Nothing came to his attention, because he is making it up in spite.

We serve disabled clients probably monthly. We have a regular client who visits us many times per year who is wheelchair bound, with no issues. We have another who regularly calls us who is in the advanced stages of Parkinson's disease. About 18 months ago we did an outcall downtown, and unfortunately the client, who had a hard time moving, fell on the floor trying to transfer from his wheelchair to the bed, and couldn't get back up. The girl wasn't strong enough to pick him up and put him back in his bed, so called me, and I went up to his place and did it myself.
And guess what? We have also served the original poster multiple times going back a decade or more

The main issues are:

#1) His location for outcall is too far for us, being a primarily incall agency, and it just doesn't make sense for us to do the back and forth, time wise nor logistically. Especially for girls with an overload of demand like Ashley or Charlotte, which are the ones he wants to see. We have arranged multiple calls for him in the past with great effort on our part, when he lived in a different location, but it just doesn't make sense for us anymore, and a large percentage of the girls don't want outcalls anymore anyway. Even with all this, the last time we explored arranging an outcall for him, he didn't want to pay the extra $40 transport fee. Well ok , how do you think our booker will respond to that? Basically say, don't bother me anymore then.

One time over like 100 texts we even tried to arrange an incall, and after all the back and forth and the finally successful booking, he ended up cancelling a few hours before. That was with myself as the booker and it wasn't great.

#2) He only will pay by e-transfer, and the girls don't accept that form of payment with rare exceptions.

All this has been explained to him many times, and it had zero to do with his disability, and he knows it. Yes, some girls might not be comfortable seeing him, especially with a caretaker present when the girl arrives, but then there are others who have no problem with it. We used to confirm with them in advance of course, when we were sending him girls.

Hopefully this doesn't sound too insensitive, but he is a very entitled guy who likes to throw accusations around when he doesn't get his way, He would almost throw a tantrum, also slinging his discrimination accusations at us, when we told him it is too complicated for us to do outcalls to his location. Finally it just ended up with one of our bookers blocking him, to end the vitriol, and that was that.

Sorry that it didn't work out, but making a huge rant about discrimination and boycotts, when he knows that was not the situation, garners a less than sympathetic response from me. So in conclusion, there is no blanket policy of not serving clients with disability, but there is, with rare exceptions (4+ hour calls etc.) a policy of not doing outcalls outside of the downtown area. That is what the girls want and that is what works best for us. I won't apologize for that.

Best regards,
James

 

[Euphoria Girls]

No one demanded uniform acceptance from anyone, the agency in question just flat out refused to serve a specific contingent of the population.

Sucking dick (etc) is just sucking dick whether it's attached to a person with a fully functional body or not, I don't need to be commended for it. lol

I think we should be careful of accepting or perpetuating a random online accusation as fact, without "knowing" for yourself. That is a big issue with online culture as a whole and the explosion of all the misinformation going on these days, especially in the world of politics or health related topics as we had during Covid. At least throwing in the word allegedly would be my suggestion.

Thanks,
James

 

[Handi]

Hi James,

Thank you for taking the time to respond — although your message makes it even clearer why this conversation needed to happen publicly.

Let me start here: since when is being an activist considered being entitled? Advocacy isn’t tantrum-throwing — it’s raising your voice when something systematically excludes a group of people. You keep bringing the debate back to me, but this isn’t about me. I’ve said it already — I have no intention of booking with your agency again. This is about what your policies represent and the precedent they set for others in my situation.

Let’s address the facts.

1. You claim distance is the issue. I live within 15 minutes of your incall location. I’ve always offered to cover extra travel fees, and paying in cash has never been a problem — despite what you claim. So let’s stop pretending this is a logistical barrier. It’s not.
2. You say there’s no blanket policy against disabled clients. Yet outcalls are systematically refused to clients who physically need them. That’s the core of the issue. When someone cannot do incall for disability-related reasons, and your top girls all opt out of outcalls. That’s discrimination — not in theory, but in practice.
3. Yes, there are risks in doing outcalls. I understand that. But we don’t fix exclusion by using a worst-case scenario as the default rule for everyone. Risk exists in all types of encounters — it’s why communication and collaboration matter. Instead, what I see here is avoidance.

You say I’ve been served before — yes, and I’ve always been respectful, upfront, and willing to adapt. But that goodwill has a limit, especially when it’s met with dismissiveness and now — public condescension.

You ended your message with, “I won’t apologize for that.” That’s your right. But it also confirms what I was calling out: a refusal to engage with nuance, to adapt, or even to acknowledge that denying people access — even unintentionally — has real consequences.

This isn’t about one client, or one girl. It’s about the kind of industry we want to build — and whether inclusion is something we just say, or something we actually mean.

Shame on you, James — not for setting limits, but for pretending they don’t hurt anyone.