Montreal Escorts

Russian invasion of Ukraine imminent, BBC reports

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
20,438
3,326
113
U.S.A.
Visit site

wetnose

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
1,010
2,207
113
Prepare for Russia itself to disintegrate

Lieutenant General (Retired) Ben Hodges is the former commander of US Army Europe and a senior advisor at Human Rights First
==============================

The Kremlin’s disastrous losses in Ukraine could result in the collapse of the Russian Federation

It is becoming increasingly clear that Ukraine is going to win this war and that the Kremlin faces a historic crisis of confidence. Indeed, I now believe it is a genuine possibility that Vladimir Putin’s exposed weaknesses are so severe that we might be witnessing the beginning of the end – not only of his regime, but of the Russian Federation itself.

This vast empire encompassing more than 120 ethnic groups is on an unsustainable footing, and like that famous Hemingway quote, its collapse may be gradual at first but could quickly become a sudden, violent and uncontrollable event. If we fail to prepare for this possibility in the way that we failed to prepare for the collapse of the Soviet Union, it could introduce immense instability to our geopolitics.

I see at least three factors that could lead to the Federation’s collapse. The first is the breakdown of domestic confidence in the Russian Army, which has traditionally been at the core of the Kremlin’s legitimacy. Its humiliation in Ukraine is now almost complete, with the proud Black Sea Fleet still hiding behind Crimea, too frightened to take action against a country that doesn’t even have a navy.

And Russian men, once enticed by the military’s pay offers, are shunning recruitment en masse in the knowledge of the fate the battlefield holds for them. This has exacerbated the disproportionate recruitment of ethnic minorities from Chechnya and other nations on the edges of the Federation – the easiest groups to use as cannon fodder – which has raised grievances that won’t easily be forgotten.

If some militant Chechens were to decide to trigger another war of independence, where would Putin find the military resources to fight it now that he has dedicated so much to Ukraine? He will no doubt be aware that if such a war is won quickly and decisively by the Chechens, it could trigger a wave of similar insurgencies across the Federation.

Second, the damage suffered by the Russian economy has been too devastating to sustain a population of 144 million. The loss of energy markets, which compensated for the country’s lack of modern industries, cannot be reversed. European governments will not rely again on Nord Stream 1, having witnessed how easily it can be turned off, and are already making long-term investments in domestic energy supply.

Russia has also relied on arms exports, but which country will be interested in buying its equipment or weapons now? Such an economic crisis can be sustained for months in the misplaced hope that business will one day return – but even in Russia the well of stoicism has its limits.

This brings us to the third factor, which is the sparse nature of Russia’s population. For despite possessing 70 times the landmass of the United Kingdom, the Federation has just twice the population. These numbers make civic solidarity difficult to achieve in the best of times, but now, with the metropole in a weak position, any sense of national identity could rapidly deteriorate.

Western sanctions will force Moscow’s elites to make difficult economic trade-offs. They will inevitably bail-out the middle classes in the capital, who pose a more immediate threat to officials, to the detriment of minority populations in the constituent nations.

Seen this way, it is shocking how little discussion there has been about the potential end of the Russian Federation. We ought to be asking difficult questions now lest they be sprung on us out of nowhere.

For instance, how would this play out in a country that has considerable stockpiles of nuclear weapons and few centres of power? Who would extract the nukes? How do we avoid leakage of weapons and militants into the Baltic states? Is a major internal conflict inevitable or can the collapse be contained within a political context?

Combined, these dilemmas pose a very significant challenge for the West. Get it wrong and we could face disaster. Our failure to prepare for the last Russian collapse some 30 years ago, and the internal unrest that ensued in its aftermath, arguably led to the Putin presidency. We cannot risk being unprepared a second time.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
20,438
3,326
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
"2022 Russian businessmen mystery deaths" You know its bad when there's a wiki page dedicated to it

It seems like there is a mini Civil War going on between Putin and assorted Russian businessmen who don't like the economic sanctions and want to run profitable businesses. I wonder how this will shake out over time. Short term, Putin maybe silences some of them, but long term none of these guys are going to be happy about running not for profit businesses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sene5hos and gaby

wetnose

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
1,010
2,207
113
"2022 Russian businessmen mystery deaths" You know its bad when there's a wiki page dedicated to it


Nothing personal, just day to day business in a state run by criminals. Just imagine the warring Mafia families in New York back in the 60s, fighting over position and territory.

In this case, an anti-Putin faction has been quietly knocking off his allies and advisors, isolating him. Maybe a new party of hardliners?
 

sene5hos

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2019
8,505
16,940
113

Ukrainian officials say they have found a mass burial site with hundreds of bodies in territory recaptured from Russian forces, in what President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called proof of war crimes by the invaders.

Mr Zelenskyy says many Ukrainians were also buried in other sites in the north-east and appealed for foreign powers to step up weapons supplies, saying the outcome of the war hinged on their swift delivery.

"As of today, there are 450 dead people, buried. But there are others, separate burials of many people.
Tortured people. Entire families in certain territories," Mr Zelenskyy said.

The head of the pro-Russian administration, which abandoned the area last week, dismissed the accounts of the burials outside the city of Izium and accused Ukrainians of stage-managing atrocities.

"I have not heard anything about burials in Izium," Vitaly Ganchev told Russian state television.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: gaby and neverbored

wetnose

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
1,010
2,207
113
Russia is struggling to annex Ukraine. But China is annexing Russia pretty effortlessly.
===========


Vladimir Putin’s bungled invasion of Ukraine has damaged his political standing at home and weakened Russia’s position abroad.

One telltale sign was the summit shenanigans at a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’s leaders last week. A notoriously petty Putin power play was turned against him.

Russian dictator often made foreign leaders suffer the humiliation of an extended wait before arriving for scheduled summits. For instance, he once kept Donald Trump waiting for 45 minutes and India’s Narendra Modi for 50. He routinely kept Ukrainian leaders waiting three or four hours. But the record was when he made German Chancellor Angela Merkel suffer an insufferable 4¼ hours.

So there was notable schadenfreude last week when four nations’ leaders made Putin wait. Modi took his opportunity to drive home Putin’s downgrading in the international order, and so did the leaders of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan.

“Putin used to make everyone wait,” observed a Ukrainian government adviser, Anton Gerashchenko. “Now he is the one waiting awkwardly. Times changed".

At home in Moscow, too, Putin’s strongman standing has been hammered down a couple of notches. After being whipped into a nationalist frenzy in support of the invasion, nationalist hardliners now are furious at Russia’s battlefield setbacks and demand a total Russian mobilisation.

Putin is “politically encircled in Moscow”, according to Ivan Krastev, chair of the Centre for Liberal Strategies in Bulgaria. The word “war” has broken into state-owned media in violation of the Kremlin’s insistence that the invasion was merely a “special military operation” and Krastev explains the potency of this change:

“A ‘special military operation’ is something to be cheered, while war is something to be feared,” he writes in the Financial Times. Special operations are “conflicts which can be lost without a population really noticing. But when you lose a war you risk losing your country".

And Putin his power. His dilemma is that he needs to demonstrate battlefield success but does not want full mobilisation. Why not? “For the same reason that he was reluctant to impose mandatory vaccination during the COVID pandemic: the fear that such a move would expose his lack of control,” if Russians refuse en masse, says Krastev.

And Russia’s economy is labouring under the heaviest sanctions it has faced since the Cold War. It has not collapsed in the way that some analysts predicted at the outset of the war in February, but the impact has been real, harmful and compounding.

The sanctions have imposed a recession that will shrink Russia’s economy by six per cent this year, according to the IMF. That’s painful but not disastrous. The main reason it’s unexpectedly mild?

While the International Energy Agency forecast Moscow would suffer a loss of three million barrels of oil exports a day under the West’s sanctions, Russian oil has continued to sell well. Because while the West largely has shunned it, China and India have shopped for it.

China’s imports of seaborne Russian Urals crude oil have boomed by 40 per cent between January and July, according to commodities consultancy Kpler. Beijing also has stepped up imports through a Siberian pipeline.

The outflow of Russian oil brings the renminbi inflow that keeps Putin’s regime afloat. This has allowed Putin to increase pensions and the minimum wage by 10 per cent, among other stimulatory state spending.

In short, as Russia staggers, China is holding it up. Overall, total Russian exports to China have burgeoned by 49 per cent between January and July to $US61.4 billion.

Analysts who describe China’s policy on the Russian invasion of Ukraine as “balanced” or “noncommittal” are overlooking Beijing’s indispensable economic underwriting of Russia’s war.

Russia’s fiscal solvency now depends on a lifeline from China, an economy 10 times bigger than Russia’s. But for Beijing, trade with Russia is peripheral – amounting to just 2 per cent of China’s total trade with the world in 2021.

Xi Jinping’s regime also supports the Russian war effort indirectly by exporting off-road vehicles for transporting command personnel, as well as drone components and naval engines, as Thomas Low and Peter W. Singer point out in a piece on the US site Defense One.

“Rather than making Russia great again,” they write, “Putin’s war in Ukraine has instead deepened Russia’s position as the clear junior partner in the Sino-Russian relationship, militarily and economically.

”Even the most recent rhetoric between the two leaders reveals the power shift. The readouts from Putin’s meeting with Xi at the Shanghai Cooperation group meeting last week “make the relationship look unbalanced, in Xi and the PRC’s favour,” remarks the US sinologist Bill Bishop in his Sinocism newsletter.

Putin publicly tugs his forelock to Xi’s “questions and your concerns” over the Ukraine war. And, in Bishop’s words, “while Putin genuflects about Taiwan and the one-China principle”, Xi offers “strong mutual support on issues concerning each other’s core interests” but no specific commitments on anything at all.

The US journal Foreign Affairs last month published an essay titled: “China’s New Vassal”. The author, Alexander Gabuev of the Carnegie Endowment think tank, wrote: “Theirs is not a relationship of equals. The Kremlin’s dependence on China will turn Russia into a useful instrument in a larger game for Zhongnanhai [the walled leadership compound in Beijing], a tremendous asset in Beijing’s competition with Washington. ”When Xi formally is endorsed by the Chinese Communist Party Congress next month to serve a third five-year term as general secretary, he will not only become the first Chinese leader since Mao to serve a third term. He will be holding Russia, once China’s tutor, now its vassal, as a trophy.

This is an undreamt-of asset for Beijing, one that only Putin’s misjudgement could have delivered.
 
Last edited:

sene5hos

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2019
8,505
16,940
113

Russian President Vladimir Putin threatened the use of nuclear weapons as he ramped up his invasion of Ukraine.

Putin announced the partial mobilization of his country's reservists in a speech on Wednesday, when he also baselessly accused the West of threatening to use nuclear weapons and gestured to Russia's own nuclear arsenal.

Putin accused the West of "nuclear blackmail," saying Western nations had encouraged Ukraine to shell the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine. Ukraine said Russia was responsible for the Zaporizhzhia shelling.

He also said that officials in NATO countries had spoken "about the possibility and admissibility of using weapons of mass destruction against Russia — nuclear weapons."

Putin is a murder, killer, crazy etc...
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaby and neverbored

neverbored

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2003
1,620
1,152
113
Visit site
Of course, not all Russians believe in this war... but I can't imagine the level of confusion for those that thought this "special military operation" was going well all this time.

Sept 20th 2022 - Putin amends the Russian Criminal Code for mobilisation and martial law

Sept 20th 2022 - Russian stock market crash

Sept 20th 2022 - Before official announcement -> Google search spikes on how to leave this shit

Sept 21st 2022 - "Russian ministrer of defence Shoigu: Russia lost 5937 people & Ukraine has lost 100k+"

Sept 21st 2022 - Putin announces 300,000 to be mobilised (Putin's decree published and in force), all eligible men(25M) are prohibited to leave their areas without document from enlistment office

Sept 21st 2022 - Flights out of Russia sell out after Putin orders partial call-up

Sept 21st 2022 - Russian Rail Website Crashes After Putin's Mobilization Decree
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
20,438
3,326
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
It's called conscription, baby. My great Grandfather was a Polish citizen who was conscripted into the Russian army in the early 20th Century. If you wonder why there is a latent hatred of Russia by Poland, this is one reason why. Of course, Russia cannot conscript Poles any more but they can certainly conscript able bodied Russian citizens.

In terms of being able bodied: Putin will declare it an act of treason for anyone to attempt to avoid conscription by harming or dismembering oneself. Punishable by death sentence. So forget about it. Do you really think Putin is this stupid? It's probably already the law.

Fleeing Russia seems like the best and safest alternative, but I am sure the borders are now tightened up making this very difficult.
 

gaby

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
10,564
7,136
113
Semblerait que beaucoup de jeunes hommes Russes s'envolent vers d'autres cieux /quittent la Russie craignant d'être recrutés pour le combat ...et voyant que des milliers de leurs militaires y ont laissé leur vie.....on peut les comprendre...ne veulent pas risquer
leur vie dans une guerre inutile engagée par un infame psychopate.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts