Since I’ve started this hobby the industry has certainly gone through some changes and amongst them this type of forum which has definitely been a game changer and has forced agencies to be accountable and sometimes adapt their practices.
There has been a power shift and Hobbyists definitely have the upper hand in my opinion to make sure that they are provided with the level of service they are entitled to expect for a relatively substantial amount of money.
The fact that reviews can make or break an SP’s career or an agency’s reputation is definitely something that the agencies are aware of and follow religiously. Furthermore they also know that an SP starting in the business will benefit from a good first review which will help spike interest and push bookings.
More than once I’ve been in situations where in exchange for writing a good review for a first timer I’ve been offered a discount on her hourly rate by the booker.
That incentive has always dissuaded me to actually book a girl that hadn’t been reviewed before hand because I wasn’t confortable either accepting the discount nor writing something that was tied to an incentive.
However it has happened that I’ve booked a girl for which I was offered a discount after she had been reviewed by someone else and couldn’t help thinking that the reviewer had also been offered the same advantage to write what he did.
Sometimes the review was accurate and the SP definitely deserved a good review without being offered the discount but in other cases I’m not sure the review would’ve been the same if the reviewer had paid full price.
Either way, shouldn’t the reviewer disclose in his review that he received a benefit for writing that review. In a way it constitutes a sponsorship but it doesn’t mean that it impacted the actual review but shouldn’t it be known and disclosed to the readers that the reviewer received some form of advantage or benefit for writing that review.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s been offered a discount on the rate of the SP in exchange for a first review and hope others will come forward if it’s been the case because it might be something worth disclosing and doesn’t mean it invalidates the genuineness of the review but still should be mentioned as it’s the case in other industries
There has been a power shift and Hobbyists definitely have the upper hand in my opinion to make sure that they are provided with the level of service they are entitled to expect for a relatively substantial amount of money.
The fact that reviews can make or break an SP’s career or an agency’s reputation is definitely something that the agencies are aware of and follow religiously. Furthermore they also know that an SP starting in the business will benefit from a good first review which will help spike interest and push bookings.
More than once I’ve been in situations where in exchange for writing a good review for a first timer I’ve been offered a discount on her hourly rate by the booker.
That incentive has always dissuaded me to actually book a girl that hadn’t been reviewed before hand because I wasn’t confortable either accepting the discount nor writing something that was tied to an incentive.
However it has happened that I’ve booked a girl for which I was offered a discount after she had been reviewed by someone else and couldn’t help thinking that the reviewer had also been offered the same advantage to write what he did.
Sometimes the review was accurate and the SP definitely deserved a good review without being offered the discount but in other cases I’m not sure the review would’ve been the same if the reviewer had paid full price.
Either way, shouldn’t the reviewer disclose in his review that he received a benefit for writing that review. In a way it constitutes a sponsorship but it doesn’t mean that it impacted the actual review but shouldn’t it be known and disclosed to the readers that the reviewer received some form of advantage or benefit for writing that review.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s been offered a discount on the rate of the SP in exchange for a first review and hope others will come forward if it’s been the case because it might be something worth disclosing and doesn’t mean it invalidates the genuineness of the review but still should be mentioned as it’s the case in other industries