beautydigger said:
Anti-real men, something you would know nothing about.
The university will accept anyone who has the money (Canada). Do you really have any concept of what is going on in this world.
... Are you saying "real" men have no money? Are "real" men the ones who clean my car? What are you saying? You have to be poor and work on your hands and knees to be a "real" man? Universities don't have financial aid?
Look, it's a classic fallacy... Identifing one's self as the "REAL" whatever, because you lack understanding of who you are and what is what.
Reasons it's a fallacy:
1. Who are you to define "men" (according to you, men are poor and often get left out of university)?
2. It's society who decide what "men" are like; Based on what men used to do (provide for his family), I would say the more successful men are the actual "model" for men (not your average Joe who thinks he's a "man" cause he spits and hates women).
3. Generalization itself usually leads to a fallacy (thus it's hard to define "men").
beautydigger said:
This is classic liberalism at its best. Using the souls of dead women. If you were not so indoctrinated by liberalism you would be ashamed. But everybody knows liberalism teaches to feel no shame.
Well, if this tragedy was to be "never" mentioned again... How will people learn? Are you the same kind of person who deny the holocaust because you don't want to "invoke" their souls? I mentioned this event to show you what your kind of hatred leads to; not to use their "souls".