And we won't get truely exceptional girls for the reason above, ie. no open auction system.
Hey, Bud. I think there are some exceptional ones out there at $200 and below. I can't imagine how different a woman could possibly look and perform to be better than a few of those I've seen at these lower prices. If a woman is delusional and thinks her services are worth more than this and chooses another line of work, I don't think her absence from the market is any hobbyist's loss.
All these indicate that at $160 to $200 some girls are already having problems getting calls.
Supply has a lot to do with it. When you look at current agency rosters, the cupboards aren't exactly bare. It would be interesting to know what effect the economy has had on the supply of SPs.
It would also be interesting to know what effect the socialization of girls has had on the apparent glutt of SPs because it seems like as time goes on it becomes more accepted by the masses for women to be just as slutty as guys have traditionally been. It's a small step to go from random hook-ups and non-committed FWBs to charging random guys for sex; a lot of SPs have flat-out told me that they see no difference, except for the fact that they're getting money, instead of dinner and drinks, by turning tricks. Scholars have argued that the socialization of girls has negatively affected demand for SPs because hook-ups and FWBs with non SPs have progressively become more available, but I don't think they have really explored how the socialization of girls may have positively affected the supply of SPs, keeping prices reasonable despite a possible fall in demand. Time will tell whether the increased promiscuity of women and availability of "quality" girls as SPs, combined with the pervasiveness of porn and the idolization of perfect beauty by the media, will eventually increase demand for SPs (and drive prices back up) as guys look at their options and say, "Why would I ever commit to that?"
