when reviewing ... your personal tastes matter

[qwerty2]

Just an idea that I think would increase the value of our collective reviews. I put it in another thread as part of another review but thought that it deserved a thread of its own.

When you do a review ... best to include your personal tastes as they give an unconscious bias to what you say. If others have similar tastes to you then they can give more credit to your opinion. If they have different tastes then they can discount the overall opinion to some degree as they see fit. At the very least they know where you come from.

 

[DirtyOWL]

best to include your personal tastes as they give an unconscious bias to what you say

QT2, thanks for repeating this topic in the lounge, and for making a good point. Here's my beef (no names): There is a popular SP that is hard to book and had no pics posted. Every one kept saying she had an "ass to die for". But they never said what that meant to them. Well, I had the opportunity to book her and I find out that an "ass to die for" meant it was like rather large (J-Lo booty). I don't like a large booty (for me, a skinny butt is an 'ass to die for'). So if I knew this, I would not have booked her, and someone who would have been happy with her would have been able to, rather than me. I think we all need to try and use better, actual descriptions rather than subjective phrases only.

So, if anyone wants to know an SP with an 'ass to die for' that has a cute, skinny butt, just PM me. And you can probably figure out the popular SP that has a large butt .

 

[Hal]

I completely agree to that!

 

[General Gonad]

Come to think of it, what is the point of reviews?

When you do a review ... best to include your personal tastes as they give an unconscious bias to what you say.

There are so many factors that can taint a review. I agree that you should state your personal taste. I preferred voluptuous brunettes that have a natural body. For SPs, Peyton was my gold standard (gorgeous face with an exotic look and natural C cup with a perfect little ass and a total sweetheart) but she was somewhat shorter than I typically like.

Judy, formerly of Devilish and now an indy at Judy's Secrets, had the most incredible body I came across (she is taller at 5'7). I never met Brittany/ Lynne of Eleganza but many here claim she has the best body. Maude of XXXtase was probably the best looking all round SP I met (face & body). But a body is just physical. Samy and Sylvia Vixen (who has the cutest face to go with that body) are a little more fuller than these ladies but they have sex appeal which is a huge turn-on.

However, the best looking sex workers by far are MPs and not SPs. Go see Kim, Maya, Vickie of Kama or Jessy of Salon Evasion (former Emmanuelle of Salon d'Or) and tell me what you would pay to have sex with them. (side note here: Peyton of Celine's also worked as an MP before joining Celine's. She was never comfortable with either job).

I also think it is important to be honest when reviewing an SP. Does she know your board handle?; what time did you see her (wee hours of the morning towards the end of her shift)?; was she in a good mood when she walked in the door?; did she suggest you take a shower together (a classic hint that you stink)?

You should also be honest of how much experience you have with ladies in general and what goddess you consider beautiful. My true gold standard of a beautiful lady is Cindy Crawford. She is a perfect 10 on 10 for me, even now in her forties. I think a lot of guys claim ladies to be gorgeous when in reality they're average (but maybe they provided a good service so guys want to inflate their looks). One example: 5'5 125 is fat for me but may be just right for someone else.

On the service front, be honest with what you like. If you like CIM, then state it. If doggie is your favorite position, then state it. Your honesty there would allow others to gauge what to expect from the lady.

I looked for a few things in reviews. Is she smart, beautiful and easy-going. If she was YMMV, I tended to be more intrigued because it indicated to me that she will not do anything with just anyone. I preferred someone who was a little feisty than a total pushover.

If you really think about all the biases we bring to reviews and all the factors that can taint reviews, you wonder what is really the point of writing reviews. The experienced hobbyist will know how to filter out the important elements from reviews in order to make sure he increases his chances of having a nice encounter.

GG

 

[Special K]

All excellent points in this thread!!

 

[johnmbot]

If you really think about all the biases we bring to reviews and all the factors that can taint reviews, you wonder what is really the point of writing reviews.

it allows us males to experience multiple orgasms. the first one is with the girl, and the second one is while we're bragging about the first one.

 

[Big Daddy Cool]

Myself I`m partial towards dark hair women with olive skin and an accent other than Canadian, American or Quebecois. I love it when for example I hear a Russian talking English or French with that Russian accent. It really turns me on. Here`s a few examples of what I like:

http://www.cupidsescorts.ca/Dhalia2.htm
http://www.cupidsescorts.ca/keana2.htm
http://www.devilishescorts.com/tabindex.aspx?PageID=gallery&GirlID=70
http://www.devilishescorts.com/tabindex.aspx?PageID=gallery&GirlID=91
http://www.devilishescorts.com/tabindex.aspx?PageID=gallery&GirlID=120
http://www.xoxgfe.com/html/jessie.html
http://hc-escorts.com/girls.html
http://hc-escorts.com/girls.html
http://www.eleganzaescorts.com/index2.htm
http://www.eleganzaescorts.com/index2.htm
http://www.montrealxxxtase.com/main.html
http://www.montrealxxxtase.com/main.html
http://www.satindreamz.ca/monica1.htm
http://www.vipescorts.ca/home.htm
http://webs.com/montreal/
http://webs.com/montreal/

Yes a woman who`s not dark hair:
http://www.candysdelights.com/delights.php

Now these women as to be as close to perfect I have ever seen:
http://www.montrealescortservice.ca/passionate.html
http://www.montrealescortservice.ca/passionate.html
http://www.xoxgfe.com/html/cleopatre.html
http://www.eleganzaescorts.com/index2.htm
http://www.eleganzaescorts.com/index2.htm
http://www.montrealxxxtase.com/main.html
http://www.montrealxxxtase.com/main.html
http://www.vipescorts.ca/home.htm
http://webs.com/montreal/

You get the picture or pictures.

 

[Lion Heart]

If you really think about all the biases we bring to reviews and all the factors that can taint reviews, you wonder what is really the point of writing reviews. The experienced hobbyist will know how to filter out the important elements from reviews in order to make sure he increases his chances of having a nice encounter.

GG,

First, welcome back! As for the subject matter, I certainly hope SP reviews will keep coming to this review board because, to be frank, they're the main reason I stick around.

I agree with most you have said. It is clear that genuine reviews (let’s forget shills here) are biased to some point because they are tainted with preferences and expectations. To me, I come to trust reviews when I trust reviewers share similar appreciations over common ladies we've met.

I've a relatively broad range of physical preferences, so unless I meet someone like Denise Bombardier or Rosie O'Donnell , you won't hear me saying I've met a real ugly one (sorry for those who find these 2 ladies attractive). While I do prefer someone on the tall side (5'7"-5'9") with nice curves and C+ cups, some of my best encounters have been with ladies who were clearly off such a frame and one of my worst encounters was with someone boosting my perfect dream physique but unfortunately the responsiveness level of an inflatable doll. Look is an important ingredient but it's far from being sufficient.

More than any specific service anticipation (as long as passionate kissing and FS are on the menu, I can be very well satisfied), it's much more the personality and attitude which make the real difference to me. These are the main elements I try focus my attention when I go through a review. The rest, especially the "scores", leave me very cold.

Lion Heart

 

[General Gonad]

More than any specific service anticipation (as long as passionate kissing and FS are on the menu, I can be very well satisfied), it's much more the personality and attitude which make the real difference to me. These are the main elements I try focus my attention when I go through a review. The rest, especially the "scores", leave me very cold.

LH,

I agree with this view. I've been with gorgeous ladies (SPs & MPs) where I didn't really enjoy myself. Something was missing. I've been with averaging looking SPs who just oozed sex appeal and I got really into the session. I also feel attitude and personality are far more important than looks when dealing with a service provider. Nobody wants to meet a gorgeous bitch who complains about everything.

It's also fair to say that we do not all click with the same person. Case in point: my favorite was Peyton but I am sure she wasn't everyone's cup of tea. I did introduce her to my buddy ass_lover. That was a funny story. He calls me back and I asked him what he thought of her. "Ah, she was alright," he sighed. "Are you serious?", I replied. He dies of laughter:"...oublie ca mon ami, c'est la perle des perles!!! Merci, merci, merci!!!" (She is the gem of gems, thank you, thank, thank you!).

Now, I wonder why I have not heard from her or ass_lover in a while.

GG

 

[johnmbot]

More than any specific service anticipation (as long as passionate kissing and FS are on the menu, I can be very well satisfied), it's much more the personality and attitude which make the real difference to me. These are the main elements I try focus my attention when I go through a review. The rest, especially the "scores", leave me very cold.

i guess my reviews aren't helping you out any, bwahahahahaha!

 

[Big Daddy Cool]

I also feel attitude and personality are far more important than looks when dealing with a service provider. Nobody wants to meet a gorgeous bitch who complains about everything.GG

This hit the nail right on the head. In my previous post I showed what I find psyically attractive, but attitude is everything. Some are hot, but o the world will end because she chiped her nail .

A great example of a lady I like is Valerie at Centre de la Sante Ontario in the massge section. I do find she has that attractive girl next door look, but most find her to be a little chuby. Me on the other hand get very turned on by her and had the greatest seasons with her before, during and after the event. She's one who never rushed me out after the hour and many times I would be conversing with her in her kitchen for an hour or two after our season at no extra charge. We just enjoyed talking.

 

[General Gonad]

If agencies and ladies were writing their real weight, I don't think 5'5/125 would seem fat to you.

Because unless someone likes skinny ladies, 5'5 and 125 pounds is a perfectly healthy weight.

Fair enough Liz. Look 5'8, 125 pounds is what I consider an excellent weight/height distribution. It doesn't mean that 5'5, 125 lbs is not healthy. But when I read she has the perfect body at 5'4 or 5'5 125 or 130 lbs, I think it's fair to say these ladies are plump. Nothing wrong with that; some men prefer it.

GG

 

[General Gonad]

5'5 and 125 is not plump. You think it is because you are used to see girls being advertise as 5'5 and 105 when in fact, they are heavier than that.

No, I've seen 5'5 115lbs and it was perfect. But that extra 10 lbs does make a difference, especially if the lady is petite.

GG

 

[Big Daddy Cool]

Someone who is 5'5 can be perfect at 115 or at 125. ... It depends how the weight is distributed, their bone structure, etc.

This is exactly the point. Some carry it well and others do not. It depends on the distribution and how pretty I find her face. She could be ultra thin with a super model look, but if her face is not what I like than I would probably not be interested. On the other hand I've seen women who could be considered a little over weight and yet the fface is super hot and they have breasts to match in a way that makes them carry their weight well.

 

[General Gonad]

Anyway... It does not matter to me. I am just saying that most of you guys are quite misinformed and mislead about the weight issue. Same thing with age.

Liz,

Beauty is in the ye of the beholder. However, some things are obvious. Look at Vickie's pics (an MP at Kama):

http://www.centresantekama.com/hostesses/

I have seen that body up close. She is 5'9, 125 lbs and she has the best body among all of Montreal's sex workers. Kim, also from Kama, is more petite but she also has an incredible body at 5'5 110lbs.

I have seen ladies at 5'5 125 lbs and they typically have tummies. I consider this plump, not gross, but plump. I realize my standards may be different because I have seen MPs and SPs and I know what the difference is between ugly, average, cute and drop-dead, jaw-dropping gorgeous.

GG

 

[General Gonad]

Ok...

Maybe I am not being clear. So I'll say it in french :

La majorité du temps, ce n'est pas le véritable poids qui est écrit!!

Ok, I believe they might lie about their weight but with those masseuses above and SPs from reputable agencies, it's +/- 5 lbs, not +/- 10 lbs.

GG

 

[General Gonad]

Ok... Let's say you are right.

Are you telling me that your ideal girl at 120 (115 but add 5 pounds!) is perfection but that another one at 125, is automatically "plump"??

5 pounds and you go from amazing to chubby?

Come on... I'll say it again : too many of you are misleaded and/or misinformed.

Liz, it depends on the height!!!! Please read my posts carefully. If it is a petite lady (5'3, 5'4 or 5'5), then going from 110 lbs to 125 lbs can be seen and it is plump. Taller ladies have more height to carry the extra weight.

GG

 

[Big Daddy Cool]

GG:
Funny how tastes are different as Maria and Kim would be my top 2 and Vickie 3rd in my ratings scale.

 

[General Gonad]

GG:
Funny how tastes are different as Maria and Kim would be my top 2 and Vickie 3rd in my ratings scale.

Actually, my number one babe at Kama is Kim. She is mature, gorgeous, sexy, intelligent and very, very sensual. This lady is amazing. If Kim was an SP, I would never look elsewhere. I'd also be broke.

GG

 

[General Gonad]

Almost sounds like you haven't retired I'm glad to see you're no longer self-flagellating yourself over 'promoting the business' anymore

I am not promoting a thing, just stating my opinion here. Kim is older and I prefer older women to the younger ones. She is a masseuse who knows how to touch a man. I have had erotic massages from younger hotties that were awful, nay, pathetic. Kim is beautiful but she also knows how to make you feel as if you're making love to her even though you are not allowed to penetrate her. It's hard to explain but some women, regardless of how they look, just have the touch of sensuality.

And yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder (glad to know I don't fit your perfect model )

Come on JAG, we both know there is no "perfect model". You know better than I do that sex starts at the brain, not between your legs.

GG