Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 128

Thread: Psycho Reviews for a Purpose or just PSYCHO Reviewers?

  1. #1

    Psycho Reviews for a Purpose or just PSYCHO Reviewers?

    There are a few posters lately who have made reviews that they (and their supporters) just want to call it being honest but it really in theory borderlines on Psycho Misogynistic Behavior. Also a few seem to target one or two agencies or Indy's and go off on the poor girl like they have an axe to grind with said agency or Indy, another trait of some scary stuff going on in ones mind. It is bothersome to see what some of the ladies have to face with guy's like this running around acting like a tough guy when in fact they are likely the biggest pussy in real life. A "tough" guy does not act like a savage animal to women whether in person nor in words written on here, but a POS does.

    It has been going on for years with a few "tough guys" here and even when they seem to have quieted down there is always another to take their place as the resident Psycho who should be in a straitjacket instead of calling escorts.

    So the question is, are there ulterior motive's to targeting certain agencies (which maybe the reviewer hates for various reasons) and their girls as a way to "hurt" the girls reputation and in turn try to sway others away from doing business with them and or the same with certain Indy's who these reviewers might have that axe to grind with? Kind of the same as a shill review only in these cases it is a negative yet still a shill review?

    It seems that some of these reviews lately of girls that have perfect to almost perfect reveiws then all the sudden get nasty and degrading ones by a certain few on here, then get more great reviews from others that follow which really isolates the one bad are simply aimed to tarnish the agency or Indy that they have problems with be it out of spite or just plain jealousy?

    Freedom of speech I get but to do it to purposely hurt someone is sick, psycho and scary (that people are like that in their heads) Stay safe Ladies and screen screen screen!

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Le Chablis, Saint - Jacques
    Posts
    3,624
    Quote Originally Posted by Mizo1951 View Post
    I know exactly what you mean.
    I read the review and I was shocked!
    yes some incall rooms are better than another..
    Yes the floor may be wet, stains here or there, but there is no reason why one would put so much hate on the girl as if she forced him to stay!
    If you don't like what you see, just walk away instead of bitching about your experience!

    Good words Igna!!

    I hate complainers, some people just don't know how lucky they have it, I feel sorry for these girls who have to put up with these arrogant POS who should not be seeing escorts in the first place.

    Good post Mizo1951.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Living in the now
    Posts
    961
    Good thread my friend,

    My position in writing rev is that there is way to talk about all situations that could happen without being rude or rough. But anyway it is so easy to see when a guy is frustrated. That it is up to everyone jugement to discern the real thing.

    We should not be too much concern about the "Psycho-rev" and for the ladies who read or hear about those comments, well: Mesdemoiselles si ce n'est pas constructif vous n'en avez rien ŕ foutre loll.

  4. #4
    In that business, though skin is mandatory, agency or not.
    I've read the review you are ''refering'' too and was also shocked.
    Bashing the appartment is IMO, totally okay.
    But HARSH comment on the girl, are simply mean... Some words should not be used, people tend to forget that we are human and we do have feelings. Never forget that girls are also reading the reviews, we are always trying to improved our services. Innovation, seduction, apparence and of course experience... But when we read such words like cheap, fake, superficial, fat, ugly, overprice, whore, it's always a shock, especially when the encounter was great/okay and that we did everything to please you.... I get the point of bad review, but it's easy to avoid harsh vocabulary, you can't justify a mean comment with a IMO...

  5. #5
    Seems like bullying to me... I hate bullies with a fucking passion... May I cross paths with this "tough guy" in the near future... Party invitation anyone??
    Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today. James Dean

    Fuck like someone's filming. Max Edge

  6. #6
    I agree with Mizo, Delta and Amanda that there are ways to say things negative in reviews that do not make you look like you belong in a prison lineup or like you live in a jungle with the rest of the animals.

    And Maxxx, there is NO NEED for those kind of people at any party I have a say in and those are the reasons we screen for the ladies safety and why many others do not like the public gt's any longer and I can't say I really blame them even tho the troublemakers are usually on their best behavior at them. If they act this way towards the SP's (hateful and vindictive) then what info are they tryng to gather and use against you in the future.

    And you are right, it is bullying and disgusting.

  7. #7
    I agree there is no reason to be harsh while being honest. I also think it goes the other way when some one does a good review 2 or 3of the same posters chime in with how she is the best escort ever after every review.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,949
    Quote Originally Posted by OhYesOui View Post
    If all the members that posted in this thread would be real men / women and had balls you could actually post in the threads you are referring to instead of starting a new thread in the lounge and implying certain members in innuendo.
    You should know that posting in the girl's thread about subject covered here would be out of topic since its not a girl's review anymore.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Visiting Planet Earth
    Posts
    4,160
    Gentlemen,

    Okay, so the review was about a G4U lady. Why not just point it out. I guessed which agency the complaint was about by the thread starter. Honestly, is Iggy going to call everyone who doesn't enjoy a G4U girl a misogynistic psycho? This isn't the first time he's done it. Talk about incredible overkill from the most biased self-interested source possible who is not an owner. Really, chill out on the impulsive hit man routine.

    Beyond that, I read this review and the first thing that struck me about the bathroom description was a freaky obsession with negative detail I wouldn't worry much about in a hundred years. Was the room gone over with a magnifying glass or something? Geeezzzuzzzz!!! Yes, I would be put off by a place that was a pig pen, but my immediate impression is the guy was looking for things to complain about from the start.

    Considering the main action description, she sounds a lot like my type. Thanks for that part of the review. I'd put lady under the heading: let's look into her reviews even more. But if she isn't someone's style it doesn't make him misogynistic to say so. It's his opinion. He may be someone who is very picky as someone said, but so what. We are paying a good amount of $$$. He's right. He is allowed his standards...IF...they are realistic and not tainted with a compulsion for negativity and complaining.

    As for the purpose of this thread, it's a good idea to remind people to be fair but not dirty. The last part of the review in question was definitely cheap, crude, and totally unnecessary. If you feel the lady didn't meet your expectations or her performance required a negative recommendation you are entitled. But there's no reason to be rotten or mean about it. You don't just trash someone as a person if she isn't your type. I didn't see anything the lady actually did to justify any of that crap. Putting it in is being filthy, ironically. Hell...I'd ban you myself if you got so low down filthy like that. Really guy, get some class. The way you wrote it comes off as if you were looking for an issue.

    Still, "Misogynistic Psycho"? Complaining...bitching...looking for problems...crude and insulting...yes. Misogynistic...no. Over-eager self-interested thread starter...DEFINITELY.

    C'mon,

    Merlot

  10. #10
    Some of you guys that think you deserve certain services and require the SP to look, and MORE IMPORTANTLY "act" (think about it) a certain way from someone that is giving of herself to you (for $ or not, does not make it right) are further out in left field as the saying goes than you could possibly imagine. With those attitudes you come across with as having, the SP's should slam the door in your face and tell you to GTFO.

    Paying good hard earned money DOES NOT excuse you from being a gentleman to someone that is freely giving of herself to you for an hour or more of her time. No wonder harper and mckay feel the way they do, it is because of a FEW (or many) like you that allow them to feel like this. Congrats to adding to the problem.

    ps. thanks guys, you were right, i knew IT could not stay out of this thread....LOL....see you next weekend for the beer i owe you! ROFL!

  11. #11
    Lol, the biggest freak is the person who started this thread, so much sophistication for something so insignificant. The girl might quit tomorrow and you twist and bend ideas like a scholar with so called proof and facts. Giving so much thought to something so volatile is not worth it, girls come and go, take and leave what you want from the review and move on.

  12. #12
    I have not seen the original review in question so I can't comment.

    However when I look back on the girls I've seen and the reviews in question there has always been something that should have been said that wasn't in the reviews. With one exception, my 1 so far expereince in Merbland.
    I never bothered posting a review in the non merb cases because in none of the cases was it enough for me to be turned off or away but it did bother me that not a single person mentioned anything and well, how do you say something negitive without the risk of having the girl figuring out who you are if you want to repeat. Awkward. Also nobody else could be bothered and some cases these girls are heavily reviewed so fuck em. [Fellow johns that is].
    Well there is one exception, a no show, just stated the facts. When someone tells you half an hour before your meeting that they are good to go and then never respond to you again, it is time to say something.

    Then I see in merb that apperently there is only one hot chick so you should just shut up and accept any deceptive advertising there is because well other people find it hot so STFU. Which to me is both a rotten attitude to take [I'm alright jack and you can sod off type attitude] and disturbing degree of the unacceptable on an escort review board. There is one board where you are not allowed to say anything negitive about a girl. That is also a sad situation.

    Not saying the review writer in question was a twatmonkey or not, I didn't see it. However I do have to wonder how much of it is a psycho review and how much of it is white knightism. Both can cripple a review board.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by wasisname View Post

    Not saying the review writer in question was a twatmonkey or not, I didn't see it. However I do have to wonder how much of it is a psycho review and how much of it is white knightism. Both can cripple a review board.
    I could not agree more both are bad. There do seem to be many more white nights at this time.

  14. #14
    In any review there are certain things I look for to build expectations of my time with the provider. If I find those things in multiple reviews I will add the SP to my tdl. I myself found the review in question informative and highlighted why I diligently avoid providers who work incall. Of course this could just be confirmation bias. I wish there was more rules as to what should be allowed in a review thread.
    Last edited by rollingstone; 10-12-2014 at 03:05 PM. Reason: kept relevant portion

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,949
    For me, the most deranging text in the review of OYO about Chloe is the use of the term: "Banged Up Whore" that has been used to described how the guy felt the encounter.
    Which is obviously an Unnecessary threat in a negative review. It's classless.

    In my book, A negative review should be constructive as opposed to destructive, and help a girl or agency to improved.
    Speculation is also to avoid in any reviews according to me.

    I guess frustration can lead to such classless reviews.

    That reminds me of another classless review for Jaida of wildtime written by Overfirend.

    Also, the first negative review made by OYO that made me realise that I should not rely to this guy review, as he obviously don't have same taste in SP as me and probably as of the average johns because the girl in question was well reviewed by numerous guys:
    Jade (Ex Lou's and now Sky at MTLTOPGIRLS): https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread....l=1#post692420
    I met Sky myself 9 times. She was amazing.

    Anyway, I must say that negative reviews is more tricky to write than positive ones according to me.
    I also like some deeper details given by some reviewers, really. But you must be carefull not to exagerate and get carried away by the frustration.

    I also beleive that when you decide to write such negative reviews the way OYO writes them, and for ladies that have numerous positive reviews, you must expect to be confronted.

    I also think OYO should see our negative reviews of his neg. reviews constructively as I still see interesting facts in his reviews and for me, negative reviews are as vital as positive ones here on merb.

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •