I like how everyone is very focused on reviews. I should have let that part out. There are threads that have nothing to do with reviews and are still full of misogynistic views. A member was suspended s few months ago exactly for that.
I think your title was really spot on especially when reading certain "reviews" from some of the "boyz" posted as examples.I think some of you only read the title of this thread and nothing else.
I’ll update it because I didn’t think it would be so misleading…
Don’t like vanillas so much as I find the kinky females are the best!Do I like women?
Honestly, right now, probably not so much. I don't really like the way they interact with others or view the world. As a more attractive man (not sexy, but probably more attractive than average) I'm used to interacting with them, and having to be charismatic etc... but it usually leaves me feeling kind of empty. I find them bossy and weak-minded / overly sensitive at the same time.
Of course, the exact same criticism can be levelled against men I know, but even those men will tend towards at least some emotional catharsis at some point... which could just be my biased perspective, admittedly.
My line of work has me dealing with women 95% of the time, and in my experience, they are more emotional (both highs and lows) and more prone to taking out the emotion on me for something that I'm trying to help them with.
------
Personally, I think these views are irrelevant to the objectification of women. And yes, part of my sexual psychological is not about caring about the holistic elements of the individual but satisfying my sexual desire. One does not have to participate if they don't want, and I won't let emotional pleas convince me that I'm wrong for my own emotional needs when it comes to sexuality.
I think women objectify men to a crazy degree in the dating scene, seeing us as a potential resource gatherer in the same way men see women as a breeding body or body for sexual pleasure. Whilst I think this generalization does capture the distilled truth of the matter, I'm not failing to recognize that there is more complexity and variability to it, I just mean to say that the objectification is a two-way street and completely natural.
------
Back to the original question:
Do I like women? Well, I would prefer to spend time -- for the most part -- with men, nowadays, whereas in the previous decade when I was in my 20s, I'd prefer the company of women.
In the context of the forum, it'd be like asking if I like waiters/waitresses or cooks. I don't really like them, no, but that doesn't mean I don't like a good job being done at a restaurant and that I won't tip well and be fully respectful to the individual working.
I feel like you may be referring in part to my post.I think some of you only read the title of this thread and nothing else.
I’ll update it because I didn’t think it would be so misleading…
He called her fat, ugly and used a word in French that could be translated to “fuck” but even more vulgar. “Fourré” as opposed to “baisé”.
Like I said in another reply, I’m not telling people they cannot be angry and write truthful/honest reviews. That’s the whole point of having a review board. They should however express themselves with a little more manners.
“She came in, I paid her, I fucked her 5 minutes, I emptied that.”
is exactly the reason women don’t like reviews and don’t want to join merb. This particular review was discussed in private conversations.
It’s not the same when it’s about a company vs one single human. Again, she might never see this review but it’s just the fact that someone can talk about someone else that way…I said worst thing about Air Canada when their sold me a ticket for an overbooked flight.
It is the same. A plumber, a mover, a contractor, your ex who cheated on you with your best friend, your best friend who slept with your ex... At least for a vast majority of people, anyone who engage is despicable actions against you will lose your respect to a degree correlating with the level of disrespect of their actions. But I still get what you mean especially because I think this girl might not be responsible or even aware of the bait and switch and is just going where the booker tells her to go so she doesn't deserve that lack of respect.It’s not the same when it’s about a company vs one single human. Again, she might never see this review but it’s just the fact that someone can talk about someone else that way…
It is indeed a very frustrating situation but I also don’t understand why he paid and stayed.
Le nom d’utilisateur est caché pour des raisons évidentes mais c’est ce à quoi je faisais référence. Un exemple parmi tant d’autres.
View attachment 59299
Would that be such a bad thing? It would just be forcing people to respect each other. I don't think any subject should be taboo, but they should be discussed respectfully and without any insults. As pointed out in previous comments, there is a difference between "I disagree with your point of view" and "wtf are you stupid lolz", or between "I didn't have chemistry with that provider so my own experience was negative but YMMV" and "she was a bitch so I used her as a cum bucket and went on my merry way". There is a way to describe things effectively without being insulting or degrading. Maybe MERB needs an HR department lol.
I’m right there with you: it’s a pretty slippery slope from "Please edit your post to a more respectful tone" to "My account just got banned because my lukewarm review apparently offended someone!!!".Of course, a level of decorum is ideal, but the issue with censorship is always the fine line of deciding what is or isn't acceptable.
Je suis d'accord avec votre point de vue. Cela peut diminuer la confiance en soi de quelqu'un et avoir des conséquences durables pour une Sp.Pour certain ça vol pas haut c'est évident.
Une solution a envisagé afin d'éviter ce style de commentaire désobligeant et TRÈS blessant (imaginé une jeune femme début début 20aine qui lit un commentaire aussi désobligeant il y a de quoi la marquer pour plusieurs semaines ; baisse d'estime de soi, manque de confiance etc.)
Il y a un thread qui date de plus d'un an si ma mémoire est exact sur ce sujet. La solution serait de standardiser le format des reviews sur le site. Un fichier prédéterminé (fait en collaboration entre vous les SP, les John comme nous et merb, cela serait un travail ardu j'en convient ) avec une section commentaire assez réduite (comme à l'époque des début de twitter style 100 caractères max voir moins)
C'est évident que ce n'est pas bullet proof, qu'il serait tout de même possible d'être désobligeant mais avec moins de possibilité d'élaborer sur le sujet. De plus ça éviterais d'avoir trop de détails dans les reviews comme ceux qui pense écrire un scénario de film de fesses. Nous savons tous que ce hobby est HAUTEMENT ymmv donc ce qu'un john peux recevoir comme service d'une compagne, il est probable que l'expérience d'un autre John soit totalement différent. Il est possible qu'en procédant ainsi les attentes serait moindre et possiblement, moins de harcèlement, pour vous mesdames, de ceux qui ne reçoivent pas le même service qui fut décrit très explicitement en long et en large inutilement
Le débat est réanimé,
Personnellement j'aimerais bien que merb en arrive là par respect au SP, qui après tout, c'est en partie en raisons d'elles que merb existe
By the way je ne fais plus de review depuis des années, 2 SP m'ont prouvés hors de tout doute, preuve à l'appui les "dommages" qu'elles ont subis suite à un commentaire vraiment désobligeant qui a été écrit sur elles. Par respect pour elle j'ai cesser.




