I agree with you on that I think a rating system lack of nuance and personal experienceI rate this idea 2.5/5
I agree with you on that I think a rating system lack of nuance and personal experienceI rate this idea 2.5/5
Why would anybody laugh at that.Your average hobbyist would laugh at the idea of booking an escort because you truly like her as a person.
How about this: 1/5, will repeat.The reality is we are all somones 1 star rating, and we are all someones 10 star rating, on a 5 star chart. It all depends what specific attractions you are looking for.
A lot of clients book me because they like my personality, and I know it's the case for many colleagues of mine. Your average hobbyist would laugh at the idea of booking an escort because you truly like her as a person.
I think in this way you fall under the category of clients who book with personality in mind.Why would anybody laugh at that.
The 2 ladies I see most often I think are both amazing and not only do I like them but I consider them as friends. I am lucky to have them both in my life.
Escorts aren’t that much different, they have the same dreams and wishes as other women and the same feelings, they know when someone cares and respects them and they certainly can tell if you genuinely like them.
If someone likes bbw, a spinner might get 1/5.How about this: 1/5, will repeat.
Or even better (worse?): 10/5, no repeat.
Pretty much all girls I see would receive low ratings… At this point, it’s all personalIf someone likes bbw, a spinner might get 1/5.
If someone likes spinners, the bbw provider might likely get 1/5.
SP doesn't offer anal 1/5.
SP had reasonable boundaries, 1/5.
...ect.
It is all relative. Who you would repeat with is such a combination of attraction, expierience, and what you are looking for. 1, 5 star rating to tally up all aspects would be a disservice to the provider and yourself as a client.
It would create just looking for the 5 stars, which for anyone who is looking for other then, socially imposed beauty standards, willing to please at all personal costs, will still likely have to then shift threw the 1-4 stars, to find what they are attracted to, is disliked and down voted by the greater population. Shaming what they like, and the providers who don't meet the hobbyist standard of perfection.
The greater important part which you have here already, is this person a scammer, or are they legit, and what about them sets them appart from others.
Who knows, I could be wrong, but then again.
Instead of complaining about reviews and proposing a new rating system, maybe start by writing a review yourself. If people happen to like it, who knows they might take your Nobel rating advice seriously. Just so you know, it’s not actually me speaking,it's ChatGPT, after thoroughly analyzing your profile on merb and reading your comments. It’s about time someone calls you out.Or just filter the reviews. For example, I randomly picked a name from the top of the review board:
Rebecca @ Vogue WOW!!
The title sounds promising and the thread is 4 pages with 73 messages. But actually 85% of those messages aren’t reviews. Only 11 are actual reviews with one user posting both a positive and a négatives one, so we’re really talking about 10 unique reviewers: 7 positive, 4 negative. It would be incredibly useful to jump straight to those 11 reviews and get the key info at a glance.
No I don’t think seeing escorts is a hobby and I don’t consider myself an aficionado either.I think in this way you fall under the category of clients who book with personality in mind.
There is a difference between clients who book on personality, and hobbyist who seem to see a body they desire, with no reguard to the person who has that body.
Do you see yourself as a hobbyist? I think how you refer to the ladies you see, I'd call you more aficionado than hobbyist.
Agreed. I would even go as far as saying that some hobbyists on this forum don't even seem to like women at all...I think in this way you fall under the category of clients who book with personality in mind.
There is a difference between clients who book on personality, and hobbyist who seem to see a body they desire, with no reguard to the person who has that body.
Do you see yourself as a hobbyist? I think how you refer to the ladies you see, I'd call you more aficionado than hobbyist.
I agree. Just seeing reviews would be nice. Answers to questions also help.Or just filter the reviews. For example, I randomly picked a name from the top of the review board:
Rebecca @ Vogue WOW!!
That may be true but I would say there are far more people who actually want someone they genuinely like and can relate to.Agreed. I would even go as far as saying that some hobbyists on this forum don't even seem to like women at all...
Instead of complaining about reviews and proposing a new rating system, maybe start by writing a review yourself. If people happen to like it, who knows they might take your Nobel rating advice seriously. Just so you know, it’s not actually me speaking,it's ChatGPT, after thoroughly analyzing your profile on merb and reading your comments. It’s about time someone calls you out.
I don't think it's useful to talk about escorts "doing it to pay their bills". At the end of the day, it's a job even if we love it, have mixed feelings about it or hate it.That may be true but I would say there are far more people who actually want someone they genuinely like and can relate to.
While where on the subject how many escorts do you think would be far happier living and being with other women and actually hate what they are doing and their clients but find it a necessary evil to pay their bills.
Is it useful to bring up that there are many hobbyists that actually dislike women.I don't think it's useful to talk about escorts "doing it to pay their bills". At the end of the day, it's a job even if we love it, have mixed feelings about it or hate it.
I really enjoy what I'm doing even if certain things are difficult and I want to provide a good service but yes. I'm not trying to villainize clients in general.. there are a lot of great clients out there, who are looking for connection and respect us![]()
I think you misunderstood. I'm not offended and I'm not pissed. I don't understand how me stating a critical opinion turns into getting accused of being "easily offended" lol I didn't think you were talking about escorts who bash clients on media, that wasn't clear in your comment.Is it useful to bring up that there are many hobbyists that actually dislike women.
Funny how you get instantly offended when the shoe is on the other foot.
Yes I get pissed when this is brought up constantly by escorts, I hate the fact that they continually bash their clients on media but then don’t have the backbone if they hate it so much to find another way to earn their living.
For the record I love women, I have had nothing but love and kindness from them and I hate it when they group all men into this category of being without feeling or just plain hating women.
Haha, no problem! Glad you liked it. Keep up the good work with your posts, and maybe one day you'll make it into the hall of fame!Let me start by saying thank you for two things.
First: for making my day. Now let’s talk about the irony. You claim that Chatgpt
went through my Merb profile and read all my comment but somehow missed the fact that I’ve written multiple reviews.
That either says a lot about how little attention you actually paid, or you’ve reached the point where your Chatgpt is so messed up, it can’t even recognize what a review looks like anymore and somehow can’t find the ones sitting right there on my profile.
That’s impressive in its own way
Second: for my “Nobel Prize in star ratings” from Chatgpt
If Obama got his Nobel Peace Prize before being sworn into office, I guess it’s ok to accept it before the system is even implemented.
But I’ll take it on behalf of Robin, a longtime member whose legacy was actually brought back because of this thread. Thanks to fellow merbites who dug into the past and did a tremendous job researching and synthesizing a lifetime of experience. Through this back-and-forth his work has resurfaced as a trailblazer in objective rating systems . And honestly, that alone made the whole debate worth it.
At the core of all this is one simple issue: unchecked subjectivity
The recurring argument against a star rating system is: “One person’s 5 is another person’s 1” that’s not a flaw in the system, that’s what happens when personal bias dominates and there’s no structure in place to balance it.
Written reviews are not much better, many read like ads, or as I like to call your reviews “infomercials” which you or Chat are clearly still bitter about.
That’s why I proposed something basic:
a “helpful / not helpful” button. Something simple to help the community separate fluff from substance. If the content is not helpful, such as exchanges between members praising each others reviews without adding anything new useful it shouldn’t clutter the thread. I mean, it should be easy to have only reviews by filtering a discussion thread that has several pages on the SP.
Let the useful reviews rise. Let the overly subjective fade. Grounding them in objective criteria to allow meaningful comparison and yield more overall fairness. Actually put
Aside personal preference to convey a more accurate portrait and not just praise blindly.
Because at the end of the day, some people actually rely on these reviews. So it’s pretty frustrating when things get so subjective that once the sp actually shows up you realize some very basic things weren’t even mentioned, or at least clearly conveyed