Attention: jbelushi

[Avery]

It's an unwritten rule of most sex boards that posters do not pass judgement on other posters' tastes, no matter how weird or bizarre they may seem. However, I'm not going to remain silent any longer.

Have you not noticed that you have received virtually no responses to your requests?

You seem to have a fixation with shit. You're looking for SP's who will let you "log a piping hot one". i.e. shit on her chest, or give her a "Dirty Sanchez", i.e. stick your finger in her ass and smear the shit around her mouth to make it look like a moustache and goatee. In your other posts, you're looking for bukkake or snowballing.

I almost get the impression you're a smartass teenager who came across a website defining these terms and you're going through them one-by-one. If you are, please grow up!

If you really are an adult looking for these "services", I don't know which is more pathetic - a man who gets sexually aroused by shitting on another human being, or a woman who would accept money in return for permitting herself to be degraded in such a manner.

 

[ManAboutTown]

What a thoughtful topic.

jbelushi, let me just say this: MERB is basically about straight and normal pursuits of massage, strip clubs, and escorts. You will notice that there is no fetish section here, no bondage section, and not even really a gay or shemale section (although that question has come up from time to time). Basically, you are in a room full of relatively straight, relatively straightforward people. This isn't a group of particularly kinky people.

I suspect a number of people here have had to check the urban dictionary to figure out what you are on about.

No matter you age, you do come across as someone who just discovered a bunch of bad words, and is using them to shock and impress the people around you in the same way that some people make fart jokes.

If this is your kink, well, congrats. Maybe Fred Zed will open up a section about it for your enjoyment. In the mean time, I would suggest that you have a look at the crowd you are talking to, and hopefully you will see that it is no more appropriate here than "a hot one" in the middle of your dinner table.

MATt

 

[naughtylady]

Degradation, arousal, fetish, just where is the line drawn? As a service provider I have met some pretty kinky people. I have 1 regular who gets aroused watching me pee. It doesn't do anything for me but he gets so turned on. Now I can psycho analyse this and say it has to do with "the forbidden" or get Freudian but in the end the reality is this is what excites him. We can't judge or decide where the lie should be drawn, it would be like saying if I like it it is erotica, if I don't it is porn. just my two cents worth.

 

[MaltedMilk]

I totally agree with naughtylady. And totally don't understand where StripperLover is coming from.

He posted his message in 411. If you don't know where he is coming from (which I would guess 95+ of us don't) then disregard!

It seems that StripperLover is genuinely offended because of words like "judgement", "degrade", "doesn't make it right". Who is he to decide. I could be wrong, but it is just the way I interpret his text.

Although I find nothing about what he does interesting to me, I think that he has every right to persue it on the 411 board. If he finds some useful "411" great, if he doesn't so be it.

When did you whoremongers become so judgemental? After all, if he finds someone to take him up on any "outrageous" act, at that point, isn't it just a business arrangement between two people. i.e. none of your (or my) concern.

MM

PS. Does one dial 411 for info in Canada? or is it another #?

 

[MaltedMilk]

Agreed Oliver!

I blame it on the alcohol.

I'll shut up and call it a night.

From now on lets not belittle others for what we find "fun" or "entertaining".

MM

But I still want to know about the 411 thing.

 

[MaltedMilk]

Like my least favorite line from Ghost.....

Ditto.

I don't find what he is looking for appealing, but I support his right to search.

MM

 

[MaltedMilk]

I was mistaken

I don't say it often but you can quote me on that.

I thought we were in 411 so I was defending (to the death) the right to ask any question, no matter how bizarre (unless it impinges on the free and legal operation of this board).

Now that I realize we are not in 411, I appologize to StripperLover and anyone else whom I might have offended.

MM

 

[MaltedMilk]

$20,

Beastiality and Necrophilia are -- at least here in the states -- illegal. Whereas in many places (NOT ALL!) scat is not.

I try to post based on what I understand to be legal. I don't try to keep someone from posting based upon my morals or ethics. Those can differ from person to person and from time to time.

---

That being said. since he has not shown up to defend himself so ... you are probably right.

MM

 

[ManAboutTown]

Actually, MM, if you read the laws carefully, bestilaity isn't illegal in all US states... but anal sex is illegal in many of them, go figure.

IMHO, jbelushi's requests aren't something I will pass judgement on directly. To each their very own. I honestly don't care on that level in the slightest. However, based on the content of MERB as a whole, it maybe isn't the right place to ask, ya know?

Everyone here has the inalienable right to be turned on by something weird, strange, silly, or sexy. Enjoy it.

MATt

 

[Happydan]

I also think it is digusting but.... I thought that the lounge was an area where anything could be asked?

 

[E B Samaritano]

Happydan,

I'd be very surprised to find a state in the US where bestiality is not illegal let alone one in which it would not be prosecuted. Even though anal sex may still be on the books as illegal in some states, there are few instances where it is specifically targeted as a basis to prosecute. Their are lots of laws in the US that simply are on the books and are outdated and unenforced. For instance, there are a few states that still have laws prohibiting interracial marriage, yet there are many interracial couples living in those jurisdictions.

To all,

And here is a shocker, one that you can write down for the annuls of history....I agree 100% with what Stripperlover has written in response to this thread. I simply don't find anything that JBelushi has written on this board pertaining to his "out of band" preferences as appropriate subject matter for this forum. It is in poor taste. The designation of "anal" is rightfully applied to anybody who doesn't get that. Avery is on target by posting his concern. An observant individual would realize that his requests for these deviant type of "services" are not a proper subject for this forum any more than gay sex.

EBS

 

[Happydan]

Beastiality?

EBS

I think you're referring to another poster; I was talking about JBELUSHI's post.

I'm a bit surprised that many of you are against his post. I thought freedom of the press was one of your sacred laws (Ours also but we do put some limits on it here).

Again I find scat, golden showers and bestiality repulsive and I’ll add for EBS's sake that I am not into men either but this is Montreal Erotic Review Board and well...to each his own. Hell many posters seek info on sessions with 2 ladies and you mean to tell me that they don't want these ladies to perform some lesbian acts? So now I’ll be facetious and say, it’s ok to be a lesbian but not ok to be gay? What about couples seeking info, those posts were not deemed out of place.

What one person finds erotic another can find disgusting. This is an open forum! Where do we draw the line? What about domination, bondage, S&M? Come to think of it, many people would find this whole board disgusting!

So again, is JBELUSHI's post out of place here in the lounge? Is it not an erotic request? JBELUSHI will find that out on his own merely by the lack of information received and I believe that this is the way we should state that this subject or any other is taboo here.

Finally, there is only one subject that I find needs to be automatically banned from this board (or any board for that matter) and that is one involving children. Fred should automatically delete those posts and send all info to the LE.

 

[Happydan]

Originally posted by oliver kloseoff
quote from happy dan
Finally, there is only one subject that I find needs to be automatically banned from this board (or any board for that matter) and that is one involving children. Fred should automatically delete those posts and send all info to the LE.

if there was such posts id be the first to report it.

if your refering to the ongoing teen prostitution trial
this is public knowledge and i dont recall anything written about the girls rather the misguided johns involved.
however if i or anyone else missed anything pointing towards kids or you feel there is indeed something of this nature you can as a responsible individual report this for the rest of us to fred
under report this post to the moderator just click
oliver

No i have'nt seen anything here and yes I would report it to the moderator. My statement was in reference to where we sould draw the line on posts that is all.

 

[Happydan]

Originally posted by 20 bucks
Alright so if we're going to do a "live and let live" about his posts, then I guess the door is open fo rme to ask what I really want to know.

Does anybody know of a farm where I could bang some sheep, geese and chickens for under forty bucks?

I'm really into donkeys too. I knew a farmer in St. Hyacinthe but my car broke down when one of my rabbits caught his tail on the distributor cap. Hard to explain that to the mechanic.


Um... for the record... just kidding...really!

Try Australia LOL where men are men and sheep are nervous.

 

[naughtylady]

another 2 cents worth

We have do business judging a persons particular tastes. When it comes to doing something illegal that should and must be reported not only to Fred, but to the authorities...espicially if we are talking about children. By the way did you know that the age of concent here in Canada is 14? Too young in my opinion. However taking pics of teens or film or for pay is illegal.

naughtylady

 

[mtwallet]

How about a "Special Interest" section for what may be considered to be "out of the norm".
As for kiddie porn, I agree with Oliver who suggested reporting requests for information to the police. Age of concent is one thing, the legality of pictures/video/encounters is another. Any poster who thinks that LE hasn't seen the board is only fooling themselves. Postings on MERB could be argued as "fictional" by a good lawyer, but at least the "suspect" would known to police.
Free speech. That same right applies to all posters here. If jbelushi wants to ask about taking a dump on someone, he should be allowed to do so without fear of attack. Everything posted is offensive to somebody. A preferance for an age specific, race specific, body type specific source of fun is what makes us all unique. This would be one very boring board if we all had what EB descibed as a "regimen" for sex.
Jbelushi, if it makes you feel good, and nobody's getting hurt, go for it.
Just my opinion.

 

[E B Samaritano]

Danroy11,

Nothing in this forum could possibly be used to personally incriminate you. Anything for which YOU would be arrested for would have to be witnessed by a representive of the law enforcement agency or would have to be a sworn complaint against you from the young lady involved and not the law enforcemnt agency.

That being said, engaging a SW is against the law. Why the sudden change in concscience? The fact is that you are apparently into exploiting women down on their luck. Otherwise you'd take your business to less desperate providers.

EBS

 

[E B Samaritano]

Re: v

Originally posted by 20 bucks
I don't think that the term "consenting adults" excuses everything.

I can think of many situations where an individual is techncally consenting to destructive behaviour. For example in Germany a guy put an ad out an ad looking for another guy to chop up and eat. Some guy answered the ad and agreed. And so the first guy chopped him up and ate him. This is not right regardless of whether they were consenting or not. And paying money to a woman to shit on her is not what I consider ethical or justifiable on any level even if she agrees to it. And this board isn't legally bound to sanction such discussion. As I argued earlier, there is a line and this is on the wrong side of that line...

Jesus Christ twenty bucks, proof again that we can agree on very little but on this narrow point you come up huge. A beautifully articulated point with which I whole heartedly agree. Ordinarily from past experience I would just skip over your posts and write them off as nothing worthwhile. But in this case I fought past that tendency when you were coherent and articulate even in the first sentence. Under those circumstances, I even read the posts of those with whom I regularly disagree. If they have something to contribute that is articulate, whether I agree or not, I will not dismiss it without a read. And then if I comment upon it, it will not be an ad hominym attack, but a proper rebuttal.

Bottom line is that this board is not a free for all for freaks. JBelulushi is way out of bounds in his observation of the temperment of the abnormal on this board. Even on the 411 thread, requests out of the normal realm are rounded rejected by commentary by the posters. This board is first and foremost for the benefit of men seeking sexual services from females. Within that context some may request information about duos, even fewer request lesbian acts between those ladies. If I object to duos it is because I think such things are a poor value for the hobbyist. But lesbian acts between women are hardly in the same category as smearing shit on somebody regardless to the sex or sexual preference of the parties involved. And they do involve a threesome which includes interaction between a man and woman. This forum is driven from the mainstream perspective of male perspective of sexualtity which has nothing to do with peeing, butt fucking or scat/smearing of feces or the sampling by any male of their own or somebody elses semen. Nobody here is looking for some guy to butt fuck them, nor are we looking for somebody to pee on us or vice versa to pee on or smear shit across their face or person. It behooves you to look at the board to determine the context, not to push the limits and then when you get your wrist slapped, insinuate that some of your perverse requests are just as acceptable as any of these other services. I object in the strongest terms to JBelushi trying to place these perverted acts in the same category, and object even more strenously to them or any act involving gay sex to ever become a proper subject for this board. The first amendment or freedom of speech has nothing to do with this observation nor the administration of this board. This is a private forum, despite its access to the public. The owners of this forum have a perfect right to determine the scope of subject matter discussed here. I have no wish to come to this forum to discuss such marginal sex practices. If the owners of this site wish to allow such discussion here, they invite yet another undesireable element of participation. In doing so they not only dictate the participants, they also set the tone for the type of advertisers they can expect to support this board. This board is aimed at the mainstream of the industry..both providers and clients alike. There are plenty of gay and perverse sites dedicated to these specialized subjects. It's my sincere feeling that the discussion of such marginal sex practices does not properly belong here.

EBS

 

[E B Samaritano]

Hey Stripperlover,

Why spoil the lovefest? There is indeed a difference in what is considered free speech in our two countries. Canada didn't have either a Constitution or a Charter of Rights until the last few years in comparison with this young fledgling nation now in charge of the world to the south of your border. That being said, I fail to see how anything in my comments on this thread have been particularly nationalistic. The only reason to insert that is to make certain that for those who are sensitive to the difference that they are aware that my statements reference my understanding of freedom of speech. It would indeed be fair to say that based on that difference of freedom of speech that I would have a different interpretation of that right as adjudicated by Canadian law. Just as it would be fair to say that my interpretation of political events and the political system or laws of any other country may be subject to what I have been accustomed to based on the laws of my country. Many here do not make that distinction. It is necessary to inject that in context as many do not take such distinctions under consideration when considering perspectives.

As for me being on point, any and all of my discussion and responses as far as I am concerned on this board are right on point. Whether you agree with that assertion is of no particular significance to me. I just felt the need to keep it real ..

EBS