Montreal Escorts

Bill C-36 Media Watchlist - you can help!

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
RCMP breaks up prostitution ring with Montreal links

http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/rcmp-breaks-up-prostitution-ring-with-montreal-links

MONTREAL GAZETTE
Published on: April 1, 2015
Last Updated: April 1, 2015 3:17 PM EDT

Investigators with the RCMP are on the lookout for two people allegedly involved in the trafficking of young women after dismantling the Montreal cell of a Canada-wide prostitution ring along with another major cell in Toronto.

According to a release issued on Wednesday, the investigation which started in January 2014 targeted “an Asian-based international criminal organization that is allegedly involved in the smuggling of young women into Canada for sexual exploitation through various bawdy-houses.”

Investigators are still searching for Mélanie Williams-Johnson, 20, of Montreal and Jeonghwan Seo, 34, of Toronto.

In total, police carried out 16 searches in Montreal and Toronto and made six arrests. Among the accused are Kai Chen, 37, from Notre-Dame-de-l’Île-Perrot, Nan Wu, 33, also from Notre-Dame-de-l’Île-Perrot, Le Yu, 38, from Montreal, and Anyang Cui, 26, from Montreal.

All of the accused have appeared — or will appear this week — at the Montreal courthouse to face a variety of charges linked to sexual exploitation.

The RCMP say they seized computers, cell phones, two vehicles and large sums of money in connection with the case.

The victims were mainly from Korea and China, and allegedly received assistance from the criminal organization to enter Canada illegally via land crossings or with visas. Police believe they were then put to work as sex workers.
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
Dominatrix Responds to Kathleen Wynne
Posted on 2015/04/02

http://blog.terrijeanbedford.com/

Dear Premier Wynne:

Today is a sad day in Ontario. It is disappointing that you and Attorney General Meilleur have made this assessment, and beyond regretful that you have done so without any consultation with the people most affected by this flawed piece of legislation. Sex work activists and allies have continuously attempted to arrange meetings with you and your staff, and have been repeatedly rebuffed. This is not merely discourteous, but downright insulting.

I am not a legal scholar, nor am I as educated as the lawyers who have spoken out on this issue. However, I know that when 200+ lawyers and legal experts sign a letter concerning the potential unconstitutionality of these laws, I can have faith that they know what they are talking about. Yet, Ms. Meilleur states there is “no clear unconstitutionality” in these laws, as if that were a legal certainty? The only thing certain about these laws is that they are certain to put sex workers in danger.

Premier Wynne, when you claim there is “no clear unconstitutionality” in these laws, even a layperson such as I can read between the lines. Just because something is not clearly unconstitutional does not mean that it is, indeed, constitutional. In fact, one of the very reasons I and my colleagues have requested a legal reference is because the laws are so unclear.

Sadly, any politician who blindly enforces an unclear law is engaging in poor public policy. Mark my words, this is not over – the laws will be contested in the highest courts in the land, and they will fall, just as the last laws did. Premier Wynne, you could have shown the courage to bring this issue to the courts, to seek clarity and help sex workers stay safe. Instead, you will now be the one to argue for the right of the state to control the behaviours of consenting adults, just as your predecessor Dalton McGuinty did. Ms. Meilleur will have to stand up in court and defend Harper’s laws, and argue for their constitutionality, just as her predecessors Chris Bentley and John Gerretsen did. But along the way, sex workers across the country will be victimized, violated, and violently harmed because of these laws.

Your refusal to meet with any sex workers before forming your opinion is insulting. Your refusal to refer these laws to the courts, when you yourself spoke of your “grave concern” regarding the effect of these laws, is disappointing. We expected better of you, and apart from a few well-scripted platitudes, you have let us down. Today is indeed a sad day in Ontario.
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
ONTARIO TURNING ITS BACK ON SEX WORKERS

https://nowtoronto.com/news/ontario-turning-its-back-on-sex-workers/#.VRx1XKuqKFM.twitter

NOW signs on with more than 10 organizations urging the government not to enforce new sex work laws and to develop new policies that promote health, safety and human rights
BY NOW STAFF APRIL 1, 2015 5:12 PM

In response to Premier Kathleen Wynne's statement today saying that Attorney General Madeleine Meilleur has not found the new sex work laws unconstitutional, NOW Magazine has joined a network urging the Ontario government not to enforce them.

Please find the statement below:

While Ontario Attorney General Madeleine Meilleur has not yet publicly released her review of Canada’s new, misguided sex work law, we understand – according to a reported statement today by Premier Kathleen Wynne – that this review has found “no clear unconstitutionality” in the so-called Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act. We disagree with this conclusion, and are profoundly disappointed that the province appears to be turning its back on sex workers and Ontarian communities, despite Premier Wynne’s own “grave concerns” with the new sex work law.

This finding flies in the face of the December 2013 ruling in R. v. Bedford, in which the Supreme Court of Canada rightly upheld the human rights of sex workers. The new law is extremely similar to the old one, which was struck down by the Court as unconstitutional, and even further criminalizes sex work in some respects. More than 190 lawyers from across Canada have gone on record expressing their concerns with the law’s constitutionality (or lack thereof). It should also be noted that the Attorney General chose not to meet with sex workers and their allies while her review was underway, preferring not to hear from those on whose backs these laws will be tested.

Canada’s current sex work law replicates – and is even worse than – the failed “Nordic” model for sex work. The model chosen targets sex workers’ clients, their means of advertising their services, and even preserves much of the unconstitutional prohibition on any communications about sexual services, including by sex workers themselves. It continues to surround sex work with a web of criminality. Sex workers have consistently articulated the many ways in which criminalizing them, their clients and their work settings does nothing to protect them, but instead undermines their ability to control their conditions of work to protect their health and safety. The law ensures that harms to sex workers will continue, and is a terrible step backwards.

Even if the Ontario Attorney General has concluded the law is “not clearly unconstitutional,” this is hardly an endorsement of the law – and certainly doesn’t remove the fact that the new provisions will contribute to the risks of harm faced by sex workers. The Government of Ontario must not enforce this misguided law. We will continue to fight for the development of laws and policies that promote health, safety and human rights for all Canadians.

Signed by NOW Magazine, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Butterfly (Asian and Migrant Sex Workers Support Network), COUNTERfit Women's Harm Reduction Program (South Riverdale Community Health Centre), Families of Sisters in Spirit, the Feminist Coalition in Support of Full Decriminalization and the Labour and Human Rights of Sex Workers, Maggie’s - Toronto Sex Workers' Action Project, Mark S. Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies (University of Toronto), POWER (Prostitutes of Ottawa-Gatineau Work Educate & Resist), Sex Work Advisory Network Sudbury (SWANS), South Western Ontario Sex Workers, Sex Professionals of Canada, STOP The Arrests Sault Ste Marie, STRUT, Women in Toronto Politics, and Jane Doe (Sexual Assault Activist),Terri-Jean Bedford and Nikki Thomas
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
Windsor pimp forced teenaged girl into prostitution

http://blogs.windsorstar.com/news/windsor-pimp-forced-teenaged-girl-into-prostitution

The Windsor Star
Apr 03, 2015 - 5:41 PM EDT
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2015 - 10:08 PM EDT

Robert Joseph Cobb is a pimp.

In 2013, he enticed a 16-year-old runaway to become a prostitute. He told her it was “easy money,” and that she could stop at any time.

He lied.

Cobb, 23, pleaded guilty Thursday to making money from human trafficking. As part of the plea bargain, charges of human trafficking, assault, forcible confinement and extortion will be withdrawn.

In February 2013, Cobb met a young ward of the Children’s Aid Society. The girl was a “habitual runaway,” without a family on which to rely, assistant Crown attorney Kim Bertholet told the court.

The girl became infatuated with Cobb. While he was already in a relationship with the mother of one of his children, he led the girl on. One day in May, he told the girl to meet him at a McDonald’s. There, court heard, he used her laptop to introduce her to a prostitution website called backpages.com.

He convinced her it wouldn’t be hard to have sex for money. She agreed to try it. Cobb created an ad, using a false picture and a false name. He decided what sexual services the girl would perform and the rates – oral sex, vaginal sex, anal sex and sex without a condom.

A couple days into her new profession, the girl wanted out.

Cobb at first played on the girl’s emotions, telling her he wanted to have a life with her. She only had to turn a few more tricks, until they had enough money to afford an apartment of their own. Later, he resorted to threats, then violence.

Cobb was new to the pimping game, but he knew enough to take precautions. He never allowed the girl to leave home alone. Cobb and the girl lived with Cobb’s father on Dougall Avenue. Cobb wasn’t using the money the girl made to pay the rent. They were eventually evicted.

They lived in seedy hotels the girl was never allowed to leave. The rooms were paid for with her earnings. Immediately after each trick, the girl was made to turn over her earnings to one of Cobb’s three friends. The friends, who also made a cut, would then deliver the cash to Cobb. “That was to insulate him in case they got caught,” Bertholet said.

The girl estimated she slept with 90 men in the ensuing two months. She earned about $31,000, but was not allowed to keep a dime. Cobb got a car out of the deal. The girl, meanwhile, was barely fed. The girl, malnourished and injured, was rescued in July 2013 after she made contact with a former boyfriend who called police.

Cobb was charged along with Cody Last, 21. Last pleaded guilty in the case and was sentenced last year to 43 days in jail on top of the 47 days he’d already spent behind bars. Bertholet said Last is a more sympathetic character. He didn’t lure the girl into prostitution, nor did he ever use violence on her. And, at least, he would buy the girl food from time to time.

Cobb is pleading guilty much later. His show of remorse comes after a preliminary hearing at which he was ordered to stand trial. His victim was made to testify at that preliminary hearing.

The girl – now 18, with a tiny frame and long, brown hair – read a victim-impact statement in court Thursday. Her brief statement demonstrated competing sentiments of betrayal and guilt.

The girl said Cobb’s friends and family replaced the people missing in her own life. “I felt like these people were all I had,” she said. Her loyalty to Cobb was still evident, she said. “I feel (he) hates me for telling the truth.”

The girl came into the courtroom flanked with support workers. In her statement, the girl said she had met “wonderful” people since Cobb’s arrest. “It helped me realize I deserve so much better.”

Her identity is protected by a publication ban.

Cobb has five prior convictions – three for assault. He spent a month in jail before being released on bail, then was rearrested last June for vandalizing a car. Defence lawyer Matthew Longay asked Superior Court Justice Kirk Munroe to give Cobb enhanced credit of 412 days for the time he has already spent behind bars, for a total sentence of 12 to 15 months. The Crown is seeking four years. Cobb’s sentencing hearing continues next week.
 

gugu

Active Member
Feb 11, 2009
1,741
18
38
Community Safety Glasgow visualises prostitution

JANINE EWEN 9 April 2015

https://www.opendemocracy.net/beyon...munity-safety-glasgow-visualises-prostitution

In 2014, Community Safety Glasgow (CSG), a charitable body owned jointly by Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Police Authority, joined the pledge for Glasgow to become a ‘White Ribbon City’. This declaration, which seeks to address and reduce incidences of violence against women in all its forms, interacts with Scotland’s zero tolerance policy on prostitution, Scotland’s Human Trafficking and Exploitation Bill (to be implemented this year), and the Violence Against Women strategy (‘Making Scotland Equally Safe’) in a combined effort to eradicate prostitution.

In addition to these current measures, the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee is exploring the creation of a single human trafficking offence for all forms of exploitation. Many submissions to the committee have asked for the bill’s central tenet to follow the so-called ‘Swedish model’. This criminalises the clients of sex workers, despite ample evidence from Sweden itself that the criminalisation of buyers leads to disastrous results. MSP Rhoda Grant, whose previous attempt to change legislation was the ‘Criminalisation of the Purchase of Sex (Scotland)’ bill in 2012, is the prime figure behind this drive. It is therefore of no surprise to those who have been following Grant’s lobby trail that the MSP has been urging feminist value organisations and Police Scotland to submit their views, making sure that ‘demand’ is a hot subject of discussion in both the analysis and conclusions.

Prostitution is legal in Scotland, however the relevant laws deem it a type of ‘anti-social behaviour’ [S.46 of the Civic Government Scotland Act 1982]. They also criminalise prostitutes who work in public spaces [S.19 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998; Prostitution (Public Places) 2007]. The period between 2013 and 2014 also witnessed brothel raids, a proposal to ban condoms and a policy of welfare visits as suspected raids, in that order.

It is therefore difficult to applaud Glasgow City Council’s White Ribbon statement of, “we want to say to women that they do not stand alone, and are not to blame for the violence used against them”, as the current legislation directly targets women in prostitution [as a public nuisance]. Furthermore, they are vicariously punished by moves to criminalise their clients, efforts which continue despite a 2004 Report of the Expert Group on Prostitution in Scotland that cautioned against motives that criminalised sex workers’ clients, for increasing stigma, and further isolation. Perhaps we should consider that these words are not inclusive of women in the sex industry; those who do not want to be saved.

Which will it be? An anti-social behaviour order (ASBO), a brothel raid or increased risks from community exclusion? None of these evoke a measure for community safety or even a progressive outcome in any ‘routes out’ initiative. The feminist alliance of ‘end demand’ charities, government officials and local authorities have framed the sex industry as an exploitative trade that ultimately leads to violence, sex trafficking and destroys communities. In this framing sex work can never be a career choice. It is an industry that must have an exit only route through zero tolerance, a door which initiates moral cleansing, but ultimately prompts prostitutes to view themselves as sexually exploited women. Only after this is agreed upon may they be included in a plan of help (in other words, consent to the stigma, then we will assist).

Sex worker-led organisations furthermore face prejudice and financial struggles because they offer both a rights-based approach and exit paths that uphold the humane traits of dignity and respect. Organisations developing practical strategies to reduce harm in Scotland are also starting to question whether they will be eligible in the future to apply for the Scottish Government’s Violence Against Women Fund. Pragmatic harm reduction activities contradict the policy’s approach to prostitution, which does not endorse tolerance.

An anonymous service provider commented:

“Given the environment and driving factors by a majority, it feels intimidating to express our concerns on the Swedish Model for sex workers. We are a frontline service and we need to protect our work and reputation, so what can we do? We work to reduce stigma, not add it.
For example, I have been pulled in previously to a government panel because I do not agree with labelling every sex worker as a victim, nevertheless I was questioned on my commitment towards ending violence”.
CSG and social media campaigns
These embedded preconceptions and stigma-fuelled remarks have evolved into visual representations of prostitutes [primarily trafficked] through the CSG social media channels. Established in 2006, CSG fosters partnerships with government agencies and communities to pursue its stated mission of creating a “safer, better, cleaner Glasgow, where equality and respect are paramount.” It functions as a type of community policing mechanism, working with other groups to tighten regulation of Glasgow’s urban space in the name of increased safety.


"Think becoming involved in prostitution is a ‘free choice’ made by ‘grown women’? That’s not the case." CSG Facebook. Fair Use

CSG campaign ‘16 days’ in December 2014 combined a heavy pro-Swedish agenda—which seeks to criminalise the clients of sex workers—with fictional newspaper clippings of prostitutes promoting their services. The general response to this crude campaign was that prostitutes needed an education by members of the public. One key and reoccurring throughout CSG’s postings is ‘choice’, and that prostitutes have none.

The pictures promoted by CSG suggest it has little understanding of the sex industry or at the very least that it ignores academic research and critical knowledge when producing its ad campaigns. It is time for the public to view a different picture, one that portrays the failure of both Scotland and Sweden to keep sex workers safe amidst their drives to eliminate prostitution.

The term prostitute has been used in accordance with Scotland’s legislation.
 

gugu

Active Member
Feb 11, 2009
1,741
18
38
Scotland

Police Raids Are Making Edinburgh's Sex Saunas Less Safe
April 20, 2015
by Liam Turbett

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/edinburgh-saunas-police-raids-435

Hidden behind a façade of blacked out windows and ambiguous language about their true purpose, "saunas" have long been a feature of Edinburgh's streets. The services offered within these establishments tends to go further than the Scandinavian steam rooms with which they share a name, because confused tourists aside, those who frequent the seven or so saunas in the Scottish capital are primarily there to buy or sell sex.

For several decades, this semi-legal arrangement was tolerated by city authorities and local police, with premises licensed under public entertainment legislation. This seemed like a pragmatic arrangement for all concerned – for the authorities, it kept sex workers off the street, and for sex workers, it kept them in the safer environs of a shared workplace. Two years ago though, something changed, with the police launching a sequence of sauna raids across Edinburgh. Within a few months, the council had announced plans to crack down on the number of licenses being issued, with both closures and prosecutions following. This followed the merger of Scotland's eight local police forces into one national body in April 2013, with a subsequent streamlining of policy.

On Tuesday, Edinburgh City Council's Health and Social Committee will meet to consider the progress of their "harm reduction strategy" towards sex work after its first year. Their report makes for grim reading, offering the first official acknowledgement that far from reducing harm, the ramping up of police raids and ending of sauna licensing has seen the city go backwards in terms of the safety and protections offered to those working in the sex trade.

Condom use among sex workers has reportedly fallen, the prevalence of STIs has slightly increased and, for the first time in eight years, the number of sex workers attending a specialist NHS clinic has gone down – by nearly 10 percent – with no corresponding evidence to suggest that the number of women selling sex has in itself reduced. Perhaps most concerning is the report's admission that the rise in unprotected sex may be "precipitated by fear of being found by the police to be in possession of condoms" which it says can be used "as evidence to indicate the selling of sex". Consequently, and as a result of the raids launched two years ago, sauna managers are said to be "reluctant" to have condoms stored on site. With saunas no longer supplying this basic protection to their workers, it concludes that this "could lead to increased risks of unprotected sex". It states that over the last year, chlamydia has increased by 2 percent, hepatitis B by 0.7 percent and hepatitis C by 0.5 percent.

The convenor of the council's health committee was quoted in the Edinburgh Evening News on Friday as conceding these outcomes have been an "unintended consequence" of the new approach. But for sex worker led advocacy organisation SCOT-PEP, which is based in Edinburgh, the negative implications of the crackdown were entirely foreseeable.

"We're really disappointed that they would make such a naïve comment, because it ignores the voice of sex worker led organisations that have put up our hands repeatedly and said, 'this is what's going to happen'," SCOT-PEP's Anelda Grové told me. "So in one way, we feel vindicated, but this isn't a positive as it's a bad outcome for sex workers."

Grové added that she questions the authorities' understanding of the concept of "harm reduction" in light of how the raids and closures have played out, although is hopeful that SCOT-PEP can now work more closely with the council to try different approaches in an effort to reverse the negative trends which have emerged.

SCOT-PEP have been particularly critical of an insistence by Police Scotland that condoms can be used as evidence of criminality, which the council report notes is making sex workers more vulnerable. "Our position is that this is incredibly dangerous, because it discourages condom use in general for sex workers," says Grové. "The police have said that this is not their policy but we haven't seen that."

In fact, in 2013 the police even went so far as to request that the council attach conditions to sauna licences prohibiting all "items of a sexual nature", which would include condoms. This move was slammed by HIV charities and while it doesn't appear to have been enacted, it has compounded the atmosphere of anxiety around condoms created by the raids. With this in mind, it's maybe unsurprising that fewer women are now attending NHS Clinics. On this, Grové says: "They might feel that they would rather not access a service where any kind of information that's divulged could be used against them, or the agency that they work for, effectively exposing them to being criminalised."

It's possibly also the case that with fewer saunas, public agencies have simply lost track of where women are now working, making contact more difficult. The report states: "Anecdotally, we hear of women now selling sex in other venues (such as lap-dancing bars), and more women are informing us that they are working from flats and advertising on the internet."

While SCOT-PEP campaign for the full decriminalisation of sex work they argue that – in the interim – saunas provide a much safer way for sex workers to operate than the alternatives. "The police need to stop interfering in sex work in such a way that makes it look like it is illegal, because it isn't," says Grové. "Where people are being exploited and abused in a managerial situation, like in a sauna, that should definitely be addressed, but we actually had a good system with the saunas in that people who didn't follow the licensing rules were called out and could be pulled up for that."

It's particularly notable that the negative effects reported in the latest council study almost exactly mirror those predicted by SCOT-PEP in their submission to a council consultation in late 2013. Then, they warned that ending the tolerance approach to saunas would see sex workers increasingly isolated, with poorer access to support services, and that the availability of condoms would be reduced with "consequent public health implications".

With the council now admitting that all of these predictions have come to pass, it's perhaps time that they started paying more attention to what sex workers themselves are saying – that's if they truly do want to pursue a "harm reduction strategy".
 

Orange_Julep

New Member
Mar 21, 2015
64
0
0
I'm posting this here because I've seen other American stories or non-related to C36 stories. Please advise if you feel I should move the post elsewhere.


Did 8 Minutes Lie to Sex Workers?

by SUZYHOOKER on APRIL 27, 2015


http://titsandsass.com/did-8-minutes-lie-to-sex-workers/ (the original includes many embedded links)

There’s been no shortage of coverage of A&E’s 8 Minutes, the ostensible reality show in which cop-turned-pastor Kevin Brown makes appointments with sex workers and then has the titular amount of time to make a case for them to stop their work. Lane Champagne wrote here in December that

Of all the professions to produce potential sex work interventionists, law enforcement and clergy are at the very top of the Unsuitable list. Behind those two are literally every single other profession, because sex work interventions are vile exercises in the hatred and shaming of sex working individuals and shouldn’t exist.

Supposedly, women who want to leave sex work will be given help. From A&E’s website: “8 Minutes follows Pastor Kevin Brown and his Lives Worth Saving team as they help sex workers and victims of sex trafficking leave their dangerous situations behind to start over.” And how do they do that?

Last week, one woman, who goes by Kamylla, came forward on Twitter to hold the show’s producers accountable for promising her assistance in exchange for her appearance on the show, then leaving her twisting in the wind when she was arrested soon after, having returned to work from economic necessity when they didn’t provide the promised help in exiting the industry.

Kamylla received a call on her work number from the producers of the show, who immediately identified themselves as such (this is in contrast to the premise of the show, which implies that the women believe they are coming to a normal appointment, only to be met by Brown). She agreed to tape a segment for the show, in which she said she wanted help getting out of the business, and after the taping was told she’d soon hear back with more information and assistance.

She never heard back from them, and instead reached out herself, but no meaningful help was to come. Kamylla found herself broke and needing to work again. She posted an ad, using the same number the 8 Minutes producers had contacted her on, and was arrested in a sting. Now she was broke, frightened, and facing criminal charges, and when she reached out for help from 8 Minutes, Brown offered to pray for her.

In search of more practical support, she began to contact writers who had been critical of the show. Kamylla wrote to Dan Savage after seeing a mention of the program on The Stranger’s blog, and Savage put her in touch with prominent Seattle sex worker activist Mistress Matisse. Matisse leapt into action and began soliciting donations from trusted friends to help Kamylla with her immediate crisis. Other members of the community soon followed: Domina Elle and Tara Burns helped create a website to tell her story. It’s heartbreaking and heartwarming at the same time: where she was ill-used by television producers, the sex worker community stepped in to help her. Once Kamylla was ready to talk, her fundraiser went public.

Kamylla’s own description of her experience in this Storify and the following excerpt from her website make it clear how little help she received in exchange for being fodder for reality TV:

The next day, no one called.
Days are passing, a week later still no call.
Now it’s two weeks later and rent is way passed due, she trusted their word and therefore had not posted an ad. Now she’s even deeper in the red. She decided to call the advocates to see what was going on. “No one has called you yet?” They said.

Let the buck passing begin. She is given a list of local resources that have nothing to do with the show or anyone participating in it. The resources turn out to be the same old exhausted resources and some were even discontinued all together! Some resources she couldn’t access for one stipulation or another. The usual story- because services are few to none despite the many millions being given to various anti trafficking organizations. The money apparently goes towards ‘raising awareness’ rather than programs and services.
Frustrated and desperate she goes back online with an ad.
What happens next?

What happened next is that she was arrested. Kamylla speculates that using the same number the show’s producers had might have endangered her, and reports have surfaced of at least one other arrest of a woman who had dealings with the show. She has warned other women who may have been in contact with 8 Minutes to change the phone numbers and photos in their ads.

Following Kamylla’s timeline on Twitter from the beginning is at once heartbreaking in revealing the damage that rescue missions do to sex workers facing hardship and instructive of how sex workers come to identify with our rights movement. While looking for help after appearing on 8 Minutes, she came into contact with current and former sex workers who, despite coming from very different sex work experiences, immediately understood the dual burdens of stigma and financial need that Kamylla faced and sprung into action with a fundraiser and the creation of a social media campaign to highlight both her personal story and her immediate needs. She has since come out in enthusiastic praise of sex workers’ rights within only a few weeks of encountering the movement.

Imagine if A&E had given even a fraction of the production costs to crowdfunding campaigns for sex workers, sex worker-run organizations, or even job training programs that would enable sex workers to enter the formal economy. Now imagine if state and local governments gave that kind of funding instead of supporting diversion programs and law enforcement imperatives that fail sex workers over and over again. Then imagine State Department funding research that addressed the problems of poverty, access, and discrimination that sex workers have repeatedly told government officials are at the root of many negative experiences of the sex industry. Kamylla’s story is one that sits at the messy intersection of failed rescue ideologies, misguided and often violent law enforcement, the reality of profoundly unhappy sex work experiences, and a sex worker rights’ community that is at times removed from the realities of criminalization and survival sex work. But this community that anti sex work activists love to shriek about being “not representative!!!!” was there to support Kamylla when others discarded or ignored her reality.

What the story has demonstrated in real time to those outside the industry and the movement is something that sex workers and a handful of woefully under-reported studies about leaving sex work have said for years: sex workers themselves are most capable of helping a fellow sex worker leave sex work under financially secure and physically safe conditions. We cannot trust rescue organizations to believe us. We cannot trust law enforcement to help us. We cannot hope for a sympathetic media to amplify this message. We can only rely on each other.

Stories like Kamylla’s can find their way into mainstream consciousness as indicators not of our brokenness but of our resilience, courage, and wholeness. Despite pathological determination by many to dehumanize us, these are the stories where we reveal the remarkable generosity, grace, and empathy that are the precious currency of our community. They are regrettably undervalued elsewhere, but they mean the world to us in a world where we still mean so little.

This post was coauthored by Lane Champagne and Bubbles.
 

gugu

Active Member
Feb 11, 2009
1,741
18
38
Barely Illegal: New prostitution laws may drive sex work underground — but can it stop it?

Richard Warnica | May 7, 2015 2:24 PM ET

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/b...drive-sex-work-underground-but-can-it-stop-it

Barely illegal: Canada’s vice laws have undergone radical change in the last few years — but it hasn’t necessarily affected how Canadians, and the police, behave. In a two-part package, National Post looks at enforcement (or the lack thereof) around marijuana and prostitution and what it means for the future.

“Raven” sells herself online as “classy, genuine and discreet.” She takes “donations” for her time: $160 for 30 minutes or $220 for a full hour. She can be a “sweet innocent girl,” she wrote in a recent posting, “or the one to fulfill all your fantasies.” But if you don’t like tattoos, she added, she’s not the one for you.

Raven, a name she uses professionally, started selling sex in Winnipeg about a year ago. “It’s something I enjoy,” she says. She isn’t trafficked. She wasn’t forced into it. She likes the people she meets. “There’s nothing wrong with it,” she says. “I’m not hurting anybody.”

In the last several months, though, Raven, 33, has noticed small changes cropping up in her industry. Clients are becoming more cautious, she believes, and advertising more discreet. Online posts — once quite explicit — are slipping into euphemism. “Everything has a to be a lot more quiet now and underground,” she says. “People are worried about being busted.”

Four months after the federal government brought into force new laws aimed at ending prostitution in this country, the vast grey market for sexual services in Canada remains, unsurprisingly, intact. From Halifax to Victoria and everywhere in between, sex is still being bought and sold in Canada, according to sex workers, police departments, researchers, and common sense.

But that doesn’t mean the industry itself hasn’t shifted in response to the laws. More importantly, it doesn’t mean the problems that prompted the legal change in the first place have gone away.

In interviews with the National Post, sex workers in five cities across Canada, all contacted through a popular sexual services website and identified here by their work names, said uncertainty over the new regulations has pushed some clients away and made business harder for them in other ways.

“What’s changed is that we’re not getting new customers,” says “Nicole,” 39, who sells sex from her apartment in Toronto. “I used to make quite a bit of money, less now because I think a lot of clients are afraid to call us.”

The new legislation, the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, or just Bill C-36, was the Conservative government’s response to Supreme Court’s ruling in the “Bedford” case.

In that landmark decision, brought down in 2013, Canada’s highest court tossed out several criminal code provisions related to the sale of sex on the grounds they violated sex workers rights to security under the Charter. The court suspended that ruling for 12 months, however, giving the federal government time to craft a new set of, in some ways, even more restrictive laws around sex work.

Bill C-36, for the first time in Canada, explicitly outlawed the buying, but not the selling of sex. It also gave police new powers to prosecute those who advertise sex work and those who exploit or otherwise make money off sex workers in all but a few limited cases.

The explicit goal of the legislation, outlined in a justice department position paper, was to reduce the demand for prostitution by “discouraging entry into it, deterring participation in it and ultimately abolishing it to the greatest extent possible.” On one, limited, level, that strategy appears to be working. “I think it’s changed for the guys since the law’s changed,” says “Stacy,” who works in a massage parlour in Edmonton. “There’s one guy I know, he’ll only see a girl he’s seen before, whereas before he’d go on Back Page [the Kijiji of escort ads] and go and see whoever.”

But if, in the short term, some sex buyers are shying away under the new regime, Chris Atchison, a research associate at the University of Victoria, doesn’t expect it to last. Atchison, who has spent almost 20 years studying men who buy sex, says what we’re seeing now is basically what happens anytime there’s any change to the laws around sex work.

“Really what we see is initially a lot of fear,” he says. Clients become more cautious as they try to gauge the police reaction and the new risks. But the market doesn’t go away in the long run.

“I’ve seen it in these various [online] forums,” he says. People say they’re retiring from “the hobby,” as they call it, or taking a break. “But I don’t think these people ever quit,” Atchison says. “They’ll walk away long enough to figure out: ‘How can I do this safely?'” But eventually, most, if not all of them, will be back.

For Atchison, the worry is that, as the industry recalibrates, it will reform in ways that are less open and thus less safe for sex workers and clients alike. One key risk, he believes, is that, by criminalizing the purchase of sex, the government has created a powerful disincentive for Johns to come forward if they see someone being abused or forced into the trade.

It’s not an abstract fear. The Toronto Police Service is currently in the midst of a large-scale crackdown on human trafficking. In two recent high profile busts, investigators were tipped off by Johns, says Detective Sgt. Nunzio Tramontozzi, the head of the department’s human trafficking division.

“A lot of these girls, what happens is the guys will say that they’re 19 or 20 or 21,” Tramontozzi says. “But when [the Johns] get to them in the hotel room, they can actually see that they’re a lot younger. They’re way too young. And they’ll say, listen, I’m leaving, but I’m going to the police.”

But when [the Johns] get to them in the hotel room, they can actually see that they’re a lot younger. They’re way too young. And they’ll say, listen, I’m leaving, but I’m going to the police Atchinson says that, under the new laws, that may be less likely to happen. In one recent survey, he asked Johns if they’d report abuse if they saw it. Many would, he said. But among those who wouldn’t, the number one reason they gave was fear of arrest or exposure.

Not every sex worker who spoke to the Post has seen their business change since the new laws came in. One woman, a grandmother who operates professionally under the name “Submissive Rose” — mostly out of Mississauga hotel rooms — says she and her clients are too discreet to attract much notice.

“I’m a bit of an anomaly, because I’m older,” she says. “I came into this recently with my eyes wide open.”


Tyler Anderson/National PostEmily Symons, representing a group called Power, leave Osgoode Hall in Toronto, Ontario, Thursday, June 16, 2011.
What seems to exist more than anything among the women interviewed for this story is uncertainty over what exactly the new laws mean and how police plan to enforce them. But police departments contacted across the country indicate little or no change – so far.

In Winnipeg, the police department had already shifted its enforcement focus toward the “wellbeing of women in the sex trade,” in 2013, Sgt. Cam Mackid said in an email. That hasn’t changed under the new regime. The department will still only charge sex trade workers “as a last resort,” Mackid wrote. Instead, investigators focus on anyone “exploiting women:” from traffickers to pimps and Johns.

It’s a similar story in Toronto, where the department had already beefed up the number of officers in the human trafficking division last year. Nunzio says investigators have charged individual pimps under the new advertising laws, but otherwise, so far, not much has changed. They are in talks with the Crown about going after websites and newspapers that host sex ads, but “there’s no plan in place as of yet” to lay charges, Nunzio says.

In Edmonton, investigators have employed the new advertising laws, but otherwise haven’t altered their sex work strategy, says department spokesman Scott Pattison.

In Victoria, too, the “new laws have not changed how we deal with street workers in our jurisdiction,” says Const. Mike Russell. “Our approach is one of working collaboratively with outreach agencies and the workers themselves to ensure their safety.”

That attitude reflects a sea change in policing in some Canadian cities that predates the Bill C-36 era, says Cecilia Benoit, a professor of Sociology at the University of Victoria and one of the lead researchers behind Understanding Sex Work, perhaps the most comprehensive academic study on the topic ever undertaken in Canada. Benoit worries that, with the new laws, some of that progress — the bridge-building between sex workers and police — might be lost.

Even if it remains static, though, if things stay largely the same under the new laws as they were under the old, there are risks. The Bedford decision did not emerge from a vacuum. The challenge to Canada’s old prostitution laws came for several reasons, but the most important one was this: sex trade workers in Canada have, for decades, been subject to horrific levels of violence.

In one study Benoit conducted, 24% of sex trade workers indicated they had been attacked on the job; 19% said someone had forced or attempted to force them into sex. Robert Pickton, the most prolific serial killer in Canadian history, murdered sex trade workers with impunity for years in B.C. before the police deigned to take notice.

And while many advocates believe policing of the sex trade has improved dramatically in the years since Pickton operated, sex trade workers are still vulnerable in Canada. Cindy Gladue, an Edmonton escort, bled to death from a vaginal wound after sex with a client in 2011. (The client, Bradley Barton, was acquitted of first-degree murder; the Crown has appealed.) Warren Mann, a client, beat Gail Brown, an escort in Ontario, nearly to death in 2012. He was convicted of attempted murder in her case last week.

Rates of workplace violence for sex work are actually lower than they are for several other professions, including emergency room nursing, as Benoit writes in a recent analysis published by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research on Thursday.

What is clear, though, according to the women who spoke for this article and to organizations that work with sex workers in Canada, is that the new laws, despite their focus on buyers not sellers, aren’t making things any safer.

“Sex workers are still being quite endangered,” says Brenda Belak, the sex work campaign lawyer at the Pivot Legal Society in Vancouver. “They’re still feeling that they have to do things in a covert manner to avoid police contact because their clients want to avoid police contact.”

“You can’t be as open and upfront as before,” agrees Raven. “This new law,” adds Nicole, “sucks.”
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
Massage parlour, body rub investigation leads to 11 deportations

Ottawa police say 11 women will be deported after a human trafficking investigation into commercial massage parlours and body rub facilities. Police say they investigated 20 locations from April 27 to 29 resulting in 11 bylaw charges for improper licensing.

Canada Border Services Agency also detained 11 women for immigration-related matters who appeared for admissibility and detention hearings last week. Removal orders were then issued for each woman. All 11 were found to be working without a valid work permit, police said.

No criminal charges were laid but police said the border services investigation continues, which could spark more charges. Ottawa police also said additional investigations were launched after the three-day bust.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa...ions-1.3067083
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
N.S. men charged in underage prostitution investigation due in court

CTV Atlantic
Published Wednesday, May 13, 2015 2:39PM ADT
Last Updated Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:09AM ADT

Two men charged in connection with a six-week investigation into underage prostitution are due in court for a bail hearing. The men were arrested without incident in Windsor, N.S. over the weekend.

Justice Treyvon Hunter, 20, of Windsor is charged with assault, uttering threats, breach of probation, extortion, keeping a bawdy house, living on the avails of prostitution and trafficking in persons. Myles Walter Card, 22, of Windsor is charged with living on the avails of prostitution. A third man was arrested Monday evening but later released without charges. Both of the accused appeared in Kentville provincial court on Monday and were remanded into custody. They are due back in court Thursday for a bail hearing.

Police say the investigation is ongoing and more charges are anticipated. Investigators say three alleged victims from Hants County have been identified. They are between the ages of 15 and 18 and are working with RCMP Victim Services. “We strongly believe that there may be other victims out there so we are urging the public to please come forward with any information you might have that would assist in the investigation,” says RCMP Sgt. Alain LeBlanc.

http://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/mobile/n-...ourt-1.2372296
 

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
PEERS Victoria, formed in 1995, was originally a loosely organized group supporting women who wanted to leave the sex trade. ...
If any group deserves a share of the federal funding, it’s this one, and it certainly needs it.

It doesn't matter what is the history of that group. They were opposed to the new law so they don't get money. This fund is just for groups that will preach the new law.
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
Sydney man facing prostitution related offences under new law

SYDNEY — A 32-year-old Sydney man has the dubious distinction of being the first on the island to face charges under new laws titled Prostitution of Communities and Exploited Persons Act.

Curtis Matthew Rose, 32, of Ferry Street, is charged with three offences under the new act.

He is charged with communicating with individuals directly and through websites for the purpose of obtaining the sex services of a Sydney man. The maximum penalty under the section is five years in prison or a $2,000 on a first conviction.

Rose is also charged with receiving a material benefit, money, by providing the male for sexual services. The maximum penalty for the charge is 10 years in jail.

The third count alleges Rose procured the sexual services of the Sydney man by exploiting him with threats of making false allegations to children's aid. The complainant is believed to be a father of two children. The maximum penalty on that count is 14 years.

The offences are alleged to have occurred between November 2014 and March of this year in Sydney.

Rose has been released on conditions that include having no contact with the complainant and he is not allowed to possess any weapons.

He is now scheduled to enter pleas to the charges July 20.

A spokesperson for Cape Breton Regional Police said Friday the charges are the result of an ongoing and extensive investigation to recent prostitution activity in downtown Sydney.

The new federal laws flow from a Supreme Court of Canada decision that struck down the nation's former laws on prostitution.

For the first time in Canadian law, it is now a crime to purchase sexual services in hopeful bid to reduce demand for such services.

http://www.capebretonpost.com/News/...-man-in-connection-to-prostitution-activity/1
 

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
I am glad to hear that MacKay was rescued from politics and is now free from the clutches of his pimp Harper. I hope he can rebuild his life and do something honest and productive with it. We need more exit programs for people who are in politics.
 

RobinX

Member
Aug 30, 2009
452
0
16
Montreal
Both @MinPeterMacKay & @MPJoySmith, architects of #c36, are too cowardly to be judged by the electorate. Rats from a sinking ship.
- Nikki Thomas,‏ former Executive Director of Sex Professionals of Canada

Touché

Good Riddance! Peter Mackay
 

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
I think Joy Smith used politics to advance her moral agenda, while MacKay used moral rhetoric to advance his political carreer. Joy is probably much worst, because she's going to continue her crusade in other ways. MacKay probably doesn't care about the issue and was just saying what he was paid to say. The next set of politicians may not be a whole lot better.
 

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
But still sad to see another country go down this ridiculous oath.

It's just the Swedish flu. It spreads quickly but I don't think it will be terminal. In the coming decade I predict a wave of decriminalization in the infected countries.
 

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
Typical journalism, where ''crack-down'' means ''monitoring as usual''.
 

Siocnarf

New Member
Jul 30, 2011
1,796
2
0
Snuggletown
I'm curious to see if they arrested anyone apart from those Femen protesters...
 

escapefromstress

New Member
Mar 15, 2012
214
0
0
The New Era of Canadian Sex Work - with Video Trailer

This week, we'll be releasing a documentary on the new paradigm for sex work in Canada. Last year, the government passed Bill C-36, which criminalizes johns who patronize sex workers. These new laws also limit the abilities for sex workers to advertise their services. The government argues that this helps protect women in the trade from human traffickers, but others say that it makes sex work more dangerous for women who are consensually working in the industry.

We sent Lowell, a pop singer and former stripper, to meet with the policy makers and police to discuss C-36. Lowell also went down to Nevada to see how a regulated, legal sex industry functions. She also met with one particular john to see how he feels about his behaviour becoming newly illegal.

Watch out for the full length coming this week.

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/video/the-new-era-of-canadian-sex-work-trailer?utm_source=vicetwitterca
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts