Montreal Escorts

Canadians apologize for all 'gay' marriages

beautydigger

Banned
Oct 11, 2005
539
0
16
"We, the people of Canada who support marriage solely as the union of a man and a woman, apologize to the people of the world for harm done through Canada's legalization of homosexual marriage".

Now thats some Canadians with balls. Why aren't there any of those guys here.

There is still hope.
 
Last edited:

Mike Mercury

Member
Sep 10, 2005
863
1
18
Why be concerned sickness and war killing the world's children?

Fretting about marriage is much more important.
 

metoo4

I am me, too!
Mar 27, 2004
2,181
2
0
If only I knew...
BD, a homosexual marriage with 2 guys, now, that's a marriage with peoples who have balls! :)

I still don't understand why peoples get so upset about things they have no right to stick their noses into! So what Homosexuals want to marry? It's their choice! What difference does it make for anybody else? NONE!

All it does is allow 2 peoples to live happily and, if they break-up, it'll make 2 more happy lawyers. That's it!

It's not like marriage becomes less of a bond because Homosexuals can be married. In fact, it reinforce the bond, indicating it's so important to some, they want to feel it too! There's not going to be more crime with Homosexuals getting married, there's not going to be more welfare, there's not going to be less jobs... The only thing this type of union won't produce is childrens and, with the state of the planet, who have nothing to do with homosexuality, I don't think it's a bad thing if less childrens are born. Crude but true.

I personally know of a few "Gay" couples who got married and one of them is together since 25 years! That's almost more than the "normal" average marriage's life these day! They got married to reiterate their love for each others. What's bad about this?
 

Fat Happy Buddha

Mired in the red dust.
Apr 27, 2005
368
0
0
Montreal
metoo4 said:
BD, a homosexual marriage with 2 guys, now, that's a marriage with peoples who have balls! :)

[...]

Nice post, metoo4. You pretty much summed up my own feelings on this issue. I would be curious to know how many of these men with "no balls" are serving with the Canadian military in Afghanistan. I suspect that there must be at least a few individuals among the two thousand that are over there. I know that there are police, RCMP and firefighters all over the country who belong to this category of men with "no balls".
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,195
0
0
I bet if it was two hot looking lesbians getting married he'd be trying to get the video of the wedding night. :cool: How ever two people want to live their lives is no one's business but their own. No one here, especially here, has the right to tell anyone else how to live their life. I congratulate anyone, hetero or gay, who is able to find that one person that makes their life complete. And has the balls to make it last through thick and thin.
 

korbel

Name Retired.
Aug 16, 2003
2,402
2
0
Her Hot Dreams
Hello Fat happy Buddha,

Yeah I could name a few. Hey, can you clean out your PM box. Cant reach you.
 

John_Cage

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
324
0
0
Is it just me? I think gay guys are GREAT !

Think about it this way... the more we encourage GAY-NESS, the more guys will turn gay ! The more guys turn gay, the less COMPETITIONS we have... Why the hell would anyone be against it?

PS: Aren't gay guys good looking and sensitive? The more gay guy there are, the less competition we have ! Score !

One gay couple = 2 girls waiting for us...

lol. On a serious note; we have no right over the matters of love. If they love each other, let them do as they please.
 

Turbodick

Member
Mar 28, 2007
615
3
18
I say two people making each other happy means two less miserable people in this world, so why not. Then again two married people might mean two more miserable people!
 

wookie

Not so active long time member
Apr 6, 2005
328
47
28
Quebec
I personally think that if two gay people want to marry, it's great. With all the bad things that happen in the world these days, better give a chance to people who want to unite and legitimize their love. Beside, why should they be allowed the same fiscal advantages as regular married couples.

However, this all gets very wrong when those newly formed couples want to raise children. It might not be an easy task (it's never easy anyway), but being legally married, they now have the right to adopt kids. And call my an old-fashioned retard if you will (and I'm only 33!), kids should be raised in a normal, caring and loving context, by a father and a mother. OK if the two loving men or women want to officialize their love, but they shouldn't be allowed to mess with kid's life in the process. There's no doupt the kids will suffer in the process, in school from other kids, from the lack of a true family model, from the lack of a woman figure (or man in the case of lesbians), to only name those.

I already hear people saying that kids get messed up even in "normal" family with a father and a mother. It's true. In my opinion, a lot of inept people should be refused the right to reproduce. We are way too much on this planet anyway. But that's a completely different subject.

So, bottomline is if it only consists of two consenting adults wanting to have their union officialized, I have no problem with that, as long as it only concern those two people and it doesn't mess up kids more than they already are in the process.

My two cents.
 

YouVantOption

Recreational User
Nov 5, 2006
1,431
1
0
114
In a house, on a street, duh.
tnaflix.com
beautydigger said:
"We, the people of Canada who support marriage solely as the union of a man and a woman, apologize to the people of the world for harm done through Canada's legalization of homosexual marriage".

Now thats some Canadians with balls. Why aren't there any of those guys here.

There is still hope.

I would like to see some specific examples of any harm done to anybody when two lesbians or gay men marry.
 

mrten

Psychiatric help, 5 cents
Mar 22, 2005
377
0
0
Last edited:

YouVantOption

Recreational User
Nov 5, 2006
1,431
1
0
114
In a house, on a street, duh.
tnaflix.com

YouVantOption

Recreational User
Nov 5, 2006
1,431
1
0
114
In a house, on a street, duh.
tnaflix.com
SMACK APPEAL said:
When two people are considered married, they get certain benefits as defined in the income tax act..tax deductions for a spouse, income splitting, pension benefits transfers and obligations on the death of one spouse..and so on....This was set up for the benefit of children of a married couple..i.e., if the wife stays home to look after the children, the husband gets a tax deduction for the non working spouse. If the husband dies, the children will not starve as certain pension benefits will transfer to the spouse...

If your single and have no dependants , your paying a larger amount of the taxes in order to finance these so called legitimate "married" couples..thats OK, as its for the benefit for society as a whole..These gay couples now enjoy the same benefits, even though they can't have children (for the most part). Someone is going to have to pick up the slack...Yeah..YOU !!

I'm not sure what slack you are talking about but what of the above should be denied to the literally dozens? hundreds? of gay married couples?? Who the hell cares if they gain some benefits? Is that not offset by an equivalent amount of straight marriages or poor quality? Arranged marriages, marriages of convenience, and so on?
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,195
0
0
SA, I understand your point of view and I used to think the same way. But my views have changed somewhat over time. Many hetero couples do not have, or plan to have, children so should they also be forbidden to marry? Gay couples should have the same equality under the law when it comes to spousal benefits, survivor benefits and so on. I'd just as soon see my tax dollars go towards a gay couples benefits as to some welfare case who drops out a kid every year just to increase her welfare payments. Or so that some well off couple can have $7 daycare so the mother can spend her time shopping or at the spa instead of staying home taking care of her children and so they can buy that third SUV for the weekend trips to the chalet.:cool:
 

naughtylady

New Member
Nov 9, 2003
2,079
2
0
58
montreal
It is not only tax benefits.

If a gay couple is not married, doesn't matter how long they have been together, if one is hospitalized, the hospital cannot give out any information. Also if they are in ICU they cannot even visit because they are not family.

If one dies, and they are not married, without a will everything goes to their nextv of kin, brothers and sisters. Even with a will, it can be more easily contested if the rrelationship is not legally recognized.

If there are children from a previous relationship who live with the couple, being married makes it much easier when dealing with school issues, such as being able to pick up the child at the end of the day.

I could go on but I think you get the picture. Heterosexual couples take so much for granted that gay couples have had to fight for.

Ronnie,
Naughtylady
 

metoo4

I am me, too!
Mar 27, 2004
2,181
2
0
If only I knew...
I don't see how kids raised in gay families can suffer more than ones in conventional families. (note the use of "conventional", not "normal").
What's better: a loving homosexual couple raising a kid or a disfunctional "conventional" family? There's a risk there also. Lots of "conventional" couples shouldn't be allowed to raise kids...

All these kids raised in gay families will learn is to be more tolerent to differences. Whatever they might suffer at school from other kids will be caused by the other kid's parents.

If peoples keep saying "We need to protect the kids from teasing so, gay couples should not raise kids.", it's only hypocrisy because THEY can't accept seeing a gay couple raising a kid. Don't give ammunitions to kids at school by reflecting your fears on them and it's amazing how accepting kids can be. A kid is not born racist or intolerent, he's raised that way. Shure there's going to be the occasional bully, kids can also be extremely cruel but, in the long run, things will smooth-out.
 

Kepler

Virgin User
May 17, 2006
572
0
16
SMACK APPEAL said:
This was set up for the benefit of children of a married couple..[...] These gay couples now enjoy the same benefits, even though they can't have children


So by that logic, a lesbian couple should have twice the tax advantages than a hetero couple.

And a couple of heterosexuals who marry after age 50 should get no advantages.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts