Yeah, she didn't notice them in the first 20 minutes so it's not like it was something major or anything. Knowing that there are old people among the regulars, I can't think that most would react in a negative way.
Do you get better services if you bring a negative STI test document?
- Thread starter baron89
- Start date
No.. to me it's a red flag if someone brings a negative test because the few times that's happened, the client wanted to pressure me into BBFs (which of course I didn't give in but I could see why someone would if they are in a bad place), and like Giselle said it doesn't mean anything.
If you're worried about something like this, get checked out and treated first. STIs are no joke. You don't want to spread something by giving it to someone who has sex with men for a living. If you find out there's nothing, warn the SP first. She'll decide if she wants to see you or not.
If you're worried about something like this, get checked out and treated first. STIs are no joke. You don't want to spread something by giving it to someone who has sex with men for a living. If you find out there's nothing, warn the SP first. She'll decide if she wants to see you or not.
I saw your post in the Romy thread and was tempted to post something slightly sarcastic (as is my cursed tendency), given your posting history here.
But I genuinely think you need to seek some psychiatric guidance. I don't know you, so I could be off-base, but your posts here - when taken collectively - actually seem genuine... even if when looked at in isolated moments seem like they must be jokes or some kind of intentional weirdness.
Your posts suggest a lot of unresolved issues regarding women, and for the sake of the women you interact with in everyday life, certainly for any SP's you may see, and not least for yourself... I hope you consider that talking to a professional may not be a bad idea.
Call me crazy, but if I were a sex worker and my income could be seriously disrupted if I contracted a STI, staph, or mrsa infection, I doubt I'd be interested in interacting sexually with a dude with open rashes, random skin conditions, and so on. Easy for you to write off the risk of your condition(s) on behalf of someone else.
And a piece of paper that is at best a snapshot in time, and might not even be accurate the day of depending on timing, wouldn't exactly fill me with confidence either. Especially if you have a nasty skin condition that isn't an STI.
Just get your conditions cleared up before putting others at risk for whatever you might have, pretty simple.
No . Agency are there to book and mediate the transaction and collect the profits . After that each girl is responsible for herself. And each client as well. If theres “sketch” happening you wouldnt know. Plus this has been said repeatedly agency has a huge turnover. So you do what you gotta do
Once again, it doesn't mean anything, and it's not common practice to do that. No matter how often you get tested, you can still contract an STI. Unless the worker is extremely low volume..
Speaking of agencies, I have heard of girls being pressured to keep working even if they have chlamydia or gonorrhea. I don't know how true that is. But they will not require tests anytime soon, for either clients or providers.
I didn't have any open sore unless you're saying that a tiny dot scab is an open sore.
Yeah, I think I need to go less often. I guess I'll go once or twice a year from now on instead of a dozen of times and just mention I got tested at the beginning and how many women I saw.
In the USA if you book a pornstar from the big agencies like PC they may require a "talent testing test", the same the pornstars do wich is done in specific places and are valid 2 weeks. Otherwise some services like BBBJ may not be available.
In Quebec tough i never seen this.
Edit :
I read your experience in the thread (i was a bit loss at first cause i didn't understand the link between STI and acne (you usually get acne in the face not on dick lol)
As you grow older the skin in general start to get all sorts of "imperfections". Plus skin on larger dudes may not look as good as skinnier ones. I would assume escorts seeings many older clients in the 60s or even older and larger guys would be used to that.
Your experience reminded me a bit of mine from early December (not the same SP tough). You can see escorts for years and have 98% good experiences as you say but then you get one where it goes south and it may make you question yourself.
I felt like you at that time but since i "rebounded" and had 2 great meetings. I hope the same for you and you can forget about it.
In Quebec tough i never seen this.
Edit :
I read your experience in the thread (i was a bit loss at first cause i didn't understand the link between STI and acne (you usually get acne in the face not on dick lol)
As you grow older the skin in general start to get all sorts of "imperfections". Plus skin on larger dudes may not look as good as skinnier ones. I would assume escorts seeings many older clients in the 60s or even older and larger guys would be used to that.
Your experience reminded me a bit of mine from early December (not the same SP tough). You can see escorts for years and have 98% good experiences as you say but then you get one where it goes south and it may make you question yourself.
I felt like you at that time but since i "rebounded" and had 2 great meetings. I hope the same for you and you can forget about it.
Last edited:
They should maybe create a two-tiered system where we can pay $500 for 1 hour and force people to give a test result from a month ago at the very latest. It would make booking much easier for me because some women get fully booked in a few hours.
You're missing my point here. I think clients who see providers should absolutely get tested as often as they can. All I'm saying is that a recent test does not prove that you don't have an STI, and a provider may be thrown off by you offering negative test results because she may assume you want bareback. If I were you I'd just take care of the health issue you're dealing with or like I said tell the provider and see if she's comfortable seeing you or not. Like Giselle said, most of us are not trained to tell the difference between STI symptoms or other skin problems.
And if you got tested a month ago, doesn't mean you are ''clean'' now. A lot of people in the industry downplay STI's.. I think it's good to practice harm reduction and yes a test from a few weeks ago is better than none, but it still doesn't prove anything.
Fungus infection, impetigo, shingles are all contagious skin problems and are not screened in a STI test. Trying to prove to everyone you have "nothing contagious" with your STI results is useless, they're not the only things that could make us miss many days or weeks of work. You are too focused on STIs. Get tested often and have peace of mind, the rest is not up to you.
You are just all over the place man. A month old STI test is basically worthless, you could have spent the last 30 days having the highest risk sex possible and sharing IV drug needles with high risk populations for all anyone knows. Whether some girls are difficult to book has nothing to do with your current issues, it's pure supply/demand. If the agencies wanted to test out price equilibrium for super popular girls. they could just bump her rates without adding useless requirements for clients.
Obviously the SP you saw noticed your skin condition(s) and it made her uncomfortable. Since the risk of getting whatever you have is entirely on her, it's unsurprising she wasn't willing to take your word that all was copacetic on the skin disease front. Get those issues taken care of and I bet you'll have better experiences in the future.
BBBJ? I don't think I want to get bareback full service, don't think I will ever ask that since it seems to be highly unreasonable unless you are willing to pay $10,000.
Similar threads
