Hello gentlemen,
True, the fact that there are many in opposition to the protests does make the basic points of the opposing writers valid, despite their habitual impulses. Even the more extreme persistent impulses can't be dismissed since that is often the foundation of writers with the will and professionalism to demonstrate public moderation. That's not to mention that biases and extremism seem equal on both sides.
Well, I agree, but isn't self-interested opportunity the reason why any movement grows on any side, and isn't this an opportunity that has attracted the unions because of the momentum created by Charests moves, and the public resentment against the perceived civil rights abuses.
Cheers,
Merlot
Fine, Rumples, but why don't you apply your filters to the articles and statements to those in favour of the protests as well?
True, the fact that there are many in opposition to the protests does make the basic points of the opposing writers valid, despite their habitual impulses. Even the more extreme persistent impulses can't be dismissed since that is often the foundation of writers with the will and professionalism to demonstrate public moderation. That's not to mention that biases and extremism seem equal on both sides.
Where is the uproar against unions getting involved by supporting the students both financially and organizationally? What business do unions have getting involved in this situation? Unions that tend to be supporters of the PQ who are also giving their support.
Well, I agree, but isn't self-interested opportunity the reason why any movement grows on any side, and isn't this an opportunity that has attracted the unions because of the momentum created by Charests moves, and the public resentment against the perceived civil rights abuses.
Cheers,
Merlot