Exclusivity, sugar baby now wife me?

[LeDodo]

I never heard of the wife me concept so I checked on google. But I still dont understand the difference with sugar daddy? I thought a real sugar daddy was an exclusive relationship. Am I missing something haha?

The constant here is indeed the sugar daddy. Well I think it works also the other way around with a Sugar mammy although rarer? (Like Travis Kelce with Taylor Swift ) And that would be Husband me I guess ...

The difference is the type of contract that is engaged. I see so far the 3 that are mentioned with the wife me that was kind of new to my knowledge.
So the 3 types of contracts:
1) Exclusive, you are dedicated to the sugar daddy for a specific period of time. Meaning you don't engage with other clients. E.g. your only client is the SD for 2 months because he wants you to go on a trip with him and you're paid 2 months exclusivity.
2) Sugar Baby, you provide companionship but you can have multiple SD at a time. Here I think the compensation is from the different financial supports, gifts, etc.
3) Wife me, you marry a SD but with a determined amount of money let's say paid every year.

I was wondering that in such case you must have a legal contract binding the 2 parties together and that unlike a case where a real relationship blossoms between the 2 of them, the SP just accepts for the rest of her life to be with someone that she might not like or have feelings with.

But going back to your question, I think the most common SD concept that we see is the number 2.
But I've seen (especially the ones that got interviewed or just share what gifts they received) sugar babies having more than 1 sugar daddy. And that 1 and 3 are slight variations to it.

 

[S.S neo]

Why WFE when you could FFE (fuck friend experience) instead ??

 

[CaptRenault]

I was just wondering and curious about the concept of wife me compared to the exclusive and sugar baby.
While the 2 later concepts seem to be defined in time, the wife me concept seems to be without limit in time. Based on that assumption I guess that some legal contracts might be put in place for such things to occur?

While the subject about client and SP having a real love connection has been discussed a lot, in this type of situation then I assume that the SP proposing such arrangements accept to live without necessarily any feelings at worst?

I've heard of this. According to some of my friends who fell for this scam, they call it "marriage."

 

[LeDodo]

I've heard of this. According to some of my friends who fell for this scam, they call it "marriage."

Let's not go there and stay professional

 

[luxurystacy]

I was wondering that in such case you must have a legal contract binding the 2 parties together and that unlike a case where a real relationship blossoms between the 2 of them, the SP just accepts for the rest of her life to be with someone that she might not like or have feelings with.

I've heard of this. According to some of my friends who fell for this scam, they call it "marriage."

Both of you are kind of right tho. A marriage IS a legal contract anyway. And many mens get married with a women for her look and women for money. It already happens all the time everyday outside the escort/sugar world. Doesn't seem that much different.

 

[Fradi]

So now you will be paying a wife me to tell you she has a head ache.
That makes a lot of sense.

 

[LeDodo]

Both of you are kind of right tho. A marriage IS a legal contract anyway. And many mens get married with a women for her look and women for money. It already happens all the time everyday outside the escort/sugar world. Doesn't seem that much different.

Yes indeed. But I want to believe to marriage for unconditional love
Although I am not denying about marriage for accomodations ...