Give me a number - What percentage of the female population have been SPs/MPs

[rumpleforeskiin]

Your handle name quite suits you.Someone should dill a few holes in you and let the sap run out
I have a discussion with your fellow crusader and you have to jump in with the same fury you 2 did with the escort boycott.Never mind single woman had to suffer at your hands but the end result is all that matters.You should thank god each day there is escorts or your right had would be worn out by now.

Thanks for your wisdom. You can go back to your masters, Tony and Ziggy, now. Denigrating sex workers, call them whores and the like, is best done on the blue board anyway.

 

[Seth]

Thanks for your wisdom. You can go back to your masters, Tony and Ziggy, now. Denigrating sex workers, call them whores and the like, is best done on the blue board anyway.

As always you guessed wrong again,I have read the blue board years ago but dont post there.
Absolutely no value to read ,and a waste of bandwidth,for the life of me I cant figure out why it stays open at all.
I used to read montreal massage a lot but it as well as this board seems on a decline.
Years ago this board was amazing but i guess its just a sign of the times.

Because someone disagree with something you write or has an opinion which you do not like this does not automatically make them a member of that board or any other.
Im trying to find out what your actually good at, but nothing so far stands out.

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

Im trying to find out what your actually good at, but nothing so far stands out.

Well, among the things I'm good at that you're not is understanding English.

 

[sweetwater]

... •committed to St. Ignatius' Home for the Bewildered ...

You forgot:under observation by a doctor for mental problems

They sound very similar to me.

....I wonder if you have a daughter,mother, sister grandmother in your presance, if you would sit with them and tell them -well 4 of you, so my deductions tell me , 2 of you must be whores ,at 1 time in your life.

Huh?

...I'll go take spelling lessions if you go seek medical help

...You can pass on the spelling "lessions" if you wish. Go to "John School", though .

I suggest both.

...Im trying to find out what your actually good at, but nothing so far stands out.

I'm trying to see what you are good at, too.

... Reinforces my previous point that you think less of sex workers than other women. Shame on you.

Oh. Yeah. Disrespect, confusion, bad spelling, ...
Sweetwater

 

[Lovemaker]

Wow, Seth is a trooper. In spite of his limited english, he definitely stood his ground! Rumples has been contained with a week long suspension. At least the moderation here seems fair(especially if u guys bring back my boy bigboyeddie). Mod9 on the other board is a homo, when he struggles to find answers to pms his bipolar and homosexuality kick in.

 

[Mod 8]

Hello Lovemaker,

We do our best to moderate fairly across the board. As for the former member you mention, like a number of others, there is no chance he will ever be permitted to return to MERB.

M8

EDIT: To clarify: Rumple's ban was related to the sports forum and a continuing situation there, not this thread. Seth has been banned for his comments in this thread.

M8

 

[wasisname]

Hello Lovemaker,

We do our best to moderate fairly across the board. As for the former member you mention, like a number of others, there is no chance he will ever be permitted to return to MERB.

M8

Could you guys please PLEASE come over to Terb for a few weeks. They really need someone to start laying the banhammer down.

 

[Lovemaker]

Rumples was banned today for a Sports Thread incident.

in the sports thread??? now that's what i call some bad sportsmanship

 

[Lovemaker]

Seth has been banned for his comments in this thread.

M8

Seth has just gone down a Martyr. Right when we thought we had a rising star.

 

[Lovemaker]

ok boys now back to the topic, where were we???........... how many whores in our population again

 

[sweetwater]

None.
Sweetwater

 

[Mod 8]

There are no martyrs here, no matter how hard some try to become one. MERB has rules and when they are broken, you get suspended. One of our most important rules is that members respect each other. While we tolerate good natured ribbing, we do not tolerate direct insults, flames or other personal attacks.

M8

Seth has just gone down a Martyr. Right when we thought we had a rising star.

 

[lgna69xxx]

Obviously this is an "opinon" post/thread and nothing more, it would be nearly impossible to get a accurate count on the %, but in NO WAY would it even come close to 100% that all of attractive ladies are or at one time were sex workers in any capacity, in Mtl.

Lets use this for example... In a week or 2 when the weather warms up, and all the winter clothes come off and we are left with beautiful spring outfits, dresses, short shorts, revealing tops, tight clothing with not a coat in sight, and all of this being worn by our cities beautiful ladies walking in and around St Catherines St on that beautiful spring day, full of warmth and sunshine, (you all know that day, the day where our heads spin 360 degrees like a swivel top going a million miles a second) we are to believe that 100% of those ladies are or have been sex workers? Not likely, and laughable to suggest such a thing. Man, i cant wait for that spring day.

 

[Dee]

I just read the banning thread the contents of which r discussed here.

I see that for Rumples repeated forbidden conduct just gets him the same ban now and in the future. I would have guessed that there might have been an escalating scale.

I thought Seth's wit and wisdom in the debate echoed the tone employed against him. I'll say no more.

A question: I thought that slagging the other board and it's members was (wisely) discouraged/forbidden here. And yet Rumples has done it with impunity. (I do appreciate that the rule was lifted during the time of national crisis, viz the wildly successful boycott. I don't see an emergency here.). Has the rule been cancelled?

Thank you.

 

[sweetwater]

...Lets use this for example... In a week or 2 when the weather warms up, and all the winter clothes come off and we are left with beautiful spring outfits, dresses, short shorts, revealing tops, tight clothing with not a coat in sight, and all of this being worn by our cities beautiful ladies walking in and around St Catherines St on that beautiful spring day, full of warmth and sunshine, (you all know that day, the day where our heads spin 360 degrees like a swivel top going a million miles a second) ... Man, i cant wait for that spring day.

Yeah!!, Baby!!! Inga, I'll meet you in some coffee shop so we can spin our heads, mumble in the latte froth, drool, and let out tongue's roll out like Murphy beds. If you have more control than that, I understand, and I'll try, but no guarantees. Nothing beats spring in Canada! A lot more liberal than most of the U.S.
Logically only a small percentage could be or have been sex workers. I'd like to work on some sex with them, though.
Sweetwater

 

[sapman99]

Dee's interpretation of "wit and wisom"

Your handle name quite suits you.Someone should dill a few holes in you and let the sap run out

Sounds like "you ought to be shot"

You should thank god each day there is escorts or your right had would be worn out by now.

Sounds like "you are a wanker"

I thought Seth's wit and wisdom in the debate echoed the tone employed against him

All I did was a point-by-point demonstration of how wrong he was, and here were his answers. Wit and wisdom indeed . Nowhere did I bring any other board into this. He did. I any case, here is his opinion of the cerulean skies:

I have read the blue board years ago but dont post there. Absolutely no value to read ,and a waste of bandwidth,for the life of me I cant figure out why it stays open at all..

A question: I thought that slagging the other board and it's members was (wisely) discouraged/forbidden here. And yet Rumples has done it with impunity. (I do appreciate that the rule was lifted during the time of national crisis, viz the wildly successful boycott. I don't see an emergency here.). Has the rule been cancelled?

Dee, question: has the slagging of MERB on MERC slacked off any ? The world wonders.

 

[Mod 8]

Hello Dee,

Rumples was banned for a transgression in the sports forum. In case you have not noticed, that part of MERB is given a bit more leeway than the principle part of the board. If it was possible to ban a member from posting in that forum only, I would do so. As I cannot do that, I do not use an escalating scale there and handle each ban on an individual basis with a few rare exceptions at my own discretion.

Seth was banned for his attack against sapman99 who's post was in no way deserving of such a response. Comments such as "someone should drill a few holes in you" are not tolerated here.

Regarding comments directed at merc, I doubt that anything anyone could post here can damage the reputation of that board or their members any more than they do themselves. As long as such comments do not become a habit and begin to increase in number, I see no problem in permitting members to express their opinion now and then.

M8

I just read the banning thread the contents of which r discussed here.

I see that for Rumples repeated forbidden conduct just gets him the same ban now and in the future. I would have guessed that there might have been an escalating scale.

I thought Seth's wit and wisdom in the debate echoed the tone employed against him. I'll say no more.

A question: I thought that slagging the other board and it's members was (wisely) discouraged/forbidden here. And yet Rumples has done it with impunity. (I do appreciate that the rule was lifted during the time of national crisis, viz the wildly successful boycott. I don't see an emergency here.). Has the rule been cancelled?

Thank you.

 

[Merlot]

I just read the banning thread the contents of which r discussed here.

I see that for Rumples repeated forbidden conduct just gets him the same ban now and in the future. I would have guessed that there might have been an escalating scale.

I thought Seth's wit and wisdom in the debate echoed the tone employed against him. I'll say no more.

A question: I thought that slagging the other board and it's members was (wisely) discouraged/forbidden here. And yet Rumples has done it with impunity. (I do appreciate that the rule was lifted during the time of national crisis, viz the wildly successful boycott. I don't see an emergency here.). Has the rule been cancelled?

Thank you.

LOL,

What you are trying to say is all the work you, Dissection Tool, and 2Legit have done to attack Rumples on the blueboard, where the main business is to attack this board and everyone on it, isn't achieving results as you wish. The mods here don't need you to tell them how to do their job.

Maybe you would like to "wisely" discourage "slagging" in blueland...if you believe in anything you post here.

Have a nice day,

Merlot

 

[Howards Johnson]

Women that need money quickly have the option of taking on a few appointments at an escort agency or pull a few Willies at a massage parlor. Guys that want to make quick money have to resort to other means. like theft or selling drugs. It is much harder for a guy to get into the drug or theft activities and it is even harder to get out. Where as for a woman she can make the quick money and get out and never look back, or can step back into at a future time depending on her needs. I would suspect 25 - 30% of Willy whackers at massage salons are part time students. Some will participate on and off for months and years, full time or part time. Others will only work at a salon for a few days to meet their needs. So 10% of the female population participating on SP or Willy at one point in their life is not an unreasonable assumption.

 

[Cash Flow]

I was discussing this with a friend just a couple of weeks ago. Here's the math:
There are about 1,600,000 people in Montreal, 800,000 of them female.
Of these 800,000, approximately 100,000 of them are between the ages of 20-30.

If the mean career expectancy of a sexworker is six months (and remember some work just a few days, some work for years) and there are 2,500 sex workers in Montreal at any given time, that means that 50,000 girls work in the sex industry over a 10 year period. If half of them are not from Montreal originally, that reduces the number to 25,000.

If my math is correct, and all of my numbers in the first paragraph are approximate, while those in the second are guesses, the answer to your question would be 25%.

Going just a bit farther now, if you assume that 75% of the female population is not attractive enough to work in the sex industry, what you're left with is 100% of all attractive females in Montreal are, at one time or another, sex workers.

Note that there is the remote possibility that some of my numbers or logic might be off, however slightly.

Slightly off? I can't begin to explain to you how out of touch you are with the demographics of Montreal. If your doctor hasn't yer ordered you to broaden your social network outside the prostitution ring, consider religion.