History teaches the opposite is true: that firing the coach scapegoats a lower level employee for the failures of the entire organization, and thus deflects blame away from the front office for their failed personnel moves and decisions.
This is partly true, as a GM in the NHL, you are, generally, allowed a few strikes when it comes to replacing your head coach, before the heat starts burning your own ass.
But, imo, the situation here, with the new management, has a few specific dynamics that makes it a bit particular. First, our GM is not only inexperienced at this new job, but he went straight from representing the players to managing a team. That, in itself, was a peculiar move from Jeff Gorton.
From the first day I felt like this could lead to conflictual situations. Hugues was well known in the league to fiercely defend and protect his clients I.e. the players. Is it a surprise that he decided to hire , not only a player to be the head coach, but one that has zero experience as such? He also went to hire Vinnie Lecavalier as consultant, adding to the other 6-7 ex- players who are also in the organization.
How comfortable will this guy be when, facing drastic decisions such as firing some of his country club’s men? Not sure about that one.
As for GMs in other sports, I don’t have any references, I don’t watch them. In terms of sports, beside hockey, I only have interest in the Vendée Globe and, sometimes, professional European football leagues (soccer). Btw, if someone can explain why American football is actually called football, I would be curious to hear it.,