Munich And The Hamas Electoral Victory
I have hesitated to embark on this thread again because it degenerated so quickly into fundamentalist views on both sides. Today, Saul Landau published an excellent article on Spielberg's movie and Hamas' election victory. I paste a quote below and the full article is on Znet:
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=9707§ionID=107
"Whatever the defects, Spielberg displayed the courage to question Israel’s supposed morality. The film’s hero and his supporting heroes learn the harshest of lessons, unlike real Mossad agents who keep assassinating. In 2004, Israeli assassins murdered the blind quadriplegic Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. A month later, they killed Hamas leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi. As American forces have discovered in Iraq, the “eye for an eye” strategy results in re-producing zealots faster than you kill them.
Avner burns out on killing. So, his handler, Ephraim, travels to New York. Come home to Israel, he tells Avner. Now skeptical, Avner asks for assurance that those he murdered really did plot Munich. He also invites Ephraim to dinner at his home. But Ephraim rejects the dinner offer and refuses to assuage Avner’s guilt. Avner becomes paranoid, thinking Mossad might kill him as well.
After all, Israel has used violence – alongside democracy – since its inception. At one point, to undermine the PLO, Israel even supported a nascent Hamas, thinking that religion would distract Palestinians from their desire for statehood and independence. Hamas turned out to bite one of the hands that initially fed it, the Israeli government. (See The Condemned of Nablus: A Review of Paradise Now in Progresoweekly.com - December 8, 2005)
Hamas won an election democratically because they and not their secular rivals showed they could deal with Israel both from a tough and clean – unlike the organization Arafat wielded – position. Calling Hamas “terrorists” misses the point. Hamas is a symbolic child of Munich – with both Palestinian and Israeli ancestors. Now, the world must decide what to do about it. The Spielberg movie will not offer much guidance. But it does raise important, myth-shattering questions."