It’s that time of the year again..
- Thread starter ssj3
- Start date
Some people here are waiting for the agency owner to ask them to review their girls but it's not my case!
I did not wait - the owner asked me before I saw the last girl. (via sms, not pm, in case any one dream of reporting my post!!!)
But i totally understand the agency owner need not ask you - you guys must be good friends lol
I thought he was talking about a lady whose name starts with M....
No Julia its not Mother. You naughty girl
Willgill said:
With some agencies yes! It's been over 5 years I'm doing the hobby and I'm well know and have good reputation with all good agencies here at mtl!
I'm always taking good care of any SP I'm receiving at home or meeting at incall location and ladies/bookers/owners really appreciate it!
And you only have a 3 month handler. Is it because you often delete your previous handler so that no one can trace you? Not saying yu are, but there are some one doing that. A name started with jona...eves comes to my mind.
And I think you mentioned that you review all SPs deserving it. So it must be the case that you have not met any one worthwhile in 4 years and 9 months. lol
Willgill I personally know Mr. P since about a month. He is real believe me haha We got chosen by our favorite sp to do a 3some. We went for a coffee just before, that is how we met and got along really well
He has a past quite similar to mine as he did a few years with mainly indies before Merb... We talked the other day about writing a book about that period. We want to call it "Catastrophe at the door" or "My dick wont fly"...
Cheers,
Hey Cloudy
I don't think I deserve that much of a credit / compliment but thank you.
And yes, you know EXACTLY who I am talking about and the "J", her choice, the preferred call-sign as the "O"
was given to her by the agency owner against her wishes (Which didn't last that long).
Laisse le faire Jalimon! Vaut pas la penne de perdre notre temps avec ce jaloux la!
Nous autres on sais qu'on est pas des "clients vanille" pis que les filles et les agences nous aiment ben pis c ca qui compte!
Y peut continuer a dire les niaiseries qui veut ca me passe 20 pied par dessus la tete!
Que c tu veux, c pas donné a tout le monde d'être beau pi de rester au village!
Nous autres on sais qu'on est pas des "clients vanille" pis que les filles et les agences nous aiment ben pis c ca qui compte!
Y peut continuer a dire les niaiseries qui veut ca me passe 20 pied par dessus la tete!
Que c tu veux, c pas donné a tout le monde d'être beau pi de rester au village!
Hey thanks Cloudsurf. Saw a few this year because of you. You saw one in particular because of me. Never apologized for the flood tho... sorry
I will proceed tomorrow night based on other comments t'ill then.
As my choice have already been posted in the unofficial post, they should not influence anyone.
Cheers,
Cheers,
Hey I dont mind. I just need some more ppl answer if they prefer the simple format:
1, Best agency sp 2017:
2, Best indy sp 2017:
I would not mind adding:
3, Best rookie (from fall 2016 to 2017):
If some of you think it's a good idea. Let me know until tomorrow night.
Cheers,
p.s. one thing I did not like previously is a merb poll was created with some names already in it to vote. In my opinion that created a lead for those girl that was not fair for others. Hence my idea to go simpler with points calculated as Gaby wrote.
p.s.(2) ho and by the way I will ask someone else to re-calculate to double check results as I tend to be goofy
I agree with the following:
1, Best agency sp 2017:
2, Best indy sp 2017:
3, Best rookie (from fall 2016 to 2017):
I think we should keep:
4, Best agency 2017:
For the following reasons:
While I also think what happened to Euphoria is unfair, wouldn't it be unfair for the other agencies not to have a chance to be rewarded? And historical continuity is both useful and interesting.
And, as the unofficial thread and some posts in the current thread have shown, there is interest for multiple categories.
I agree to go simpler with points calculated as Gaby wrote.
I'm good at numbers and Excel, so I'll be happy to help with the recount if I can be useful.
Thanks Mannish. If one or 2 more think best agency should be back I am ok. You are ok with best rookie. I also ask my hobby spiritual guide SSJ and he thinks it should be in also.
So far the guidelines are simple:
- Best sp in the first 2 category can be named in the rookie category as well.
- Merbiste who joined in Dec 2017 will be ignored (sorry, see you next year).
- No edits or delete to post.
I am missing some important ones?
Cheers,
p.s. and yes will need help for validation, even if I already got some, extra will be good and take less time on each of us.
So far the guidelines are simple:
- Best sp in the first 2 category can be named in the rookie category as well.
- Merbiste who joined in Dec 2017 will be ignored (sorry, see you next year).
- No edits or delete to post.
I am missing some important ones?
Cheers,
p.s. and yes will need help for validation, even if I already got some, extra will be good and take less time on each of us.
Yo we should definitely keep "best agency", what the hell?
all agency owners put a lot of work and should be recognized. I've met them all and they all work like slaves.
we gotta remember without them our hobby would be a nightmare because we'd be booking on backpages
all agency owners put a lot of work and should be recognized. I've met them all and they all work like slaves.
we gotta remember without them our hobby would be a nightmare because we'd be booking on backpages
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
- Poll
