Montreal Escorts

Major League Baseball Mud

donbusch

The Longest Title in MERB
Mar 16, 2003
717
390
63
Beer Factory
Visit site
This story appears in the July 29, 2019, issue of Sports Illustrated.

Jim Bintliff’s collection of lies is small and sharply curated, each one loose enough to be plausible and mundane enough to limit interest in verifying it. They work like this: Bintliff will be out on the banks of a tributary of the Delaware River, in his personal uniform of denim cutoffs and disintegrating sneakers, using a shovel to harvest buckets of mud. Someone will come along and ask what he’s doing. Bintliff sizes up the questioner, usually a boater or swimmer or fisherman, then picks from his collection. I’ve been sent by the Environmental Protection Agency, and I’m surveying the soil. Or: I’m helping the Port Authority, looking into pollution. Or, if it’s a group of young folks who look like they’ve only come out on the water for a good time: I take this mud, and I put it on my pot plants. They grow like trees.

This always does the trick. It prevents anyone from exploring what he’s actually doing, which is what he’s done for decades, what his father did before him, and his grandfather before him: Bintliff is collecting the mud that is used to treat every single regulation major league baseball, roughly 240,000 per season.

Mud is a family business; it has been for more than half a century. For decades, baseball’s official rule book has required that every ball be rubbed before being used in a game. Bintliff’s mud is the only substance allowed. Originally marketed as “magic,” it’s just a little thicker than chocolate pudding—a tiny dab is enough to remove the factory gloss from a new ball without mucking up the seams or getting the cover too filthy. Equipment managers rub it on before every game, allowing pitchers to get a dependable grip. The mud is found only along a short stretch of that tributary of the Delaware, with the precise location kept secret from everyone, including MLB.

Read more at https://www.si.com/mlb/2019/08/07/baseball-mud-rawlings
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
Interesting article. Why invest research dollars to displace a $12,000 solution? It could be the labor and time of hand rubbing baseballs but when Miggy makes $30MM/year to hit a dozen or so HRs/year as a DH (he's currently playing at -0.1 WAR), why would anyone give a shit about having to hand rub baseballs with four 100$/5 gallon bucket of mud?
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
Ha! They have been using the same mud since the 50's so the guys says no way. But since Rawlings hasn't been able to find a drop in substitute or a way to eliminate the mid, how could it be?

I wonder about the issue of homers on the upswing. What could it be? They went to maple bats. But look at the number of pitchers throwing >92-95. If the pitchers are getting stronger why not the hitters?
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
HRs are up but so are strikeouts. Last night the Rays set a major league record by striking out 24 Tigers while issuing no walks. The most Ks without a walk ever in a MLB game. Of the top 10 HR hitters in MLB, only 3 have less than 100 strikeouts:

Kepler, 83
Bellinger, 84
Encarnacion, 96

Of these 3, the best HR to strikeout ratio is Bellinger with 41 HRs to only 84 Ks. A 1 to 2 ratio that anyone will take. But compare this to Joe DiMaggio who hit 361 HRs in his career (losing several of his prime years to WWII military service) while only striking out 369 times- almost a 1 to 1 ratio. This is why he had a 56 game hitting streak, he kept the ball in play and didn’t whiff. But we could argue he didn’t face guys throwing 98 mph with vicious sliders, which every single MLB team now has coming out of its bullpen, in some cases multiple guys who throw that hard.
 

No_Church_InThe_Wild

Well-Known Member
May 31, 2014
866
394
63
Didn’t want to start a new thread. Nothing to do with mud , but baseball related.
I used to watch the Braves in the nineties when they where perennial contenders with all the great pitching on their rosters ,,, unfortunately they couldn’t win more than one World Series championship .
These days I still follow them from time to time as I’m a fan of some players and their GM .
Watched the game yesterday and was ticked off with the showboating of Ronald Acuna Jr. which might have actually cost them the game . To top it off he was even called out by the opposing pitcher for being disrespectful. Bat flips are a part of the game but this is the postseason you need to hustle on every play like your life depended on it ,,, you owe that to your teammates . Nobody is doubting he’s talent but he needs to play the game the right way ,,, hope he makes up for it in game 2 .
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Acuna Jr. could have run harder but I don't think it would have been an automatic double if he had, as many suggested. The ball was coralled by the right fielder pretty quickly. The real problem was he thought the ball was gone, and truthfully lots of guys throw it into neutral when they think the ball is going out.

Later in the game though, he got doubled while leaning too far off second base on a line out by Donaldson to the SS. That DP was way too easy. Donaldson was very upset after the DP and it was not clear to me if it was his bad luck or the Acuna baserunning gaffe that exorcised him.

These things do happen with players from time to time. Even Clay Bellinger who will likely win NL MVP, was benched for not hustling:

https://www.mlb.com/news/cody-bellinger-benched-for-not-hustling-c274482540

You did not hear about this much because Bellinger is white and gets more of a pass from media than Acuna, who is black. However, neither really gets a pass from their managers and teammates.
 

No_Church_InThe_Wild

Well-Known Member
May 31, 2014
866
394
63
It looked like a double but we shall never know for sure . Acuna Jr. is a very speedy base runner ,but your right the ball was corralled pretty fast by the right fielder so the defence wasn’t without a chance. Again I agree about the media being biased,,, although my criticism of him was not influenced by any ESPN article as I immediately berated him while almost chocking on some chicken wings.

Joking aside , EB your a Baseball guy so you know very well that in a one run game you just can’t take anything for granted. He’s done that sort of thing before and if this wasn’t the playoffs he surely would have been benched like Bellinger .

Good news for the Braves fans is that they where able to bounce back and tie the series . Even better news is that I genuinely think that Acuna Jr. learned from he’s mistake . I read he’s statement and I think he gets it now. But your right EB about black and Latino players being criticized more harshly when at fault.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I did not mean to sound like I give Acuna Jr. a pass, because I don't. I just thought the noise on his misplays was a bit loud. He is a very young guy who is adjusting to the spotlight and being a star in MLB. It's debatable whether he would have gotten to 2B but I agree he has to run harder, and not assume balls are going out. I think my main point is this type of thing in baseball is not so uncommon, especially with younger players.

Reggie Jackson was once removed from a game in mid-inning by Yankees manager Billy Martin after kind of jogging after a ball in RF. At the time, Reggie was a star player, 30 years old and a veteran. He was never a very good outfielder and his body language in the field was often non-chalant and casual, and Martin decided to send him a message by replacing him with defensive specialist Paul Blair in mid inning of a nationally televised game of the week. This led to a famous fight/altercation in the dugout:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHctFAj1ywI

This is a situation that probably could have been handled differently than it was, but Reggie did loaf on the play and he had a bad habit of having terrible body language on fielding plays where he looked like he was going after the ball very casually.

Acuna Jr. may be considered to be a little bit in the Reggie Jackson mold, although you hope that as he develops as a player, he can do better and avoid being benched for not hustling.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
The numerosity of pitching changes is prolonging games. That’s why the minimum 3 batter rule is coming into the game for all pitching changes. No more one batter and done.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
So Friday there were 44 at bats that were strikeout, walk, or homerun out of 66 at bats. That's 2/3 of the plays. And it took over 4 hours!

Walks do not count as at bats in baseball. For there to be an at bat there has to be a hit or an out. Walks do count as plate appearances and are factored into a player's on base percentage.

However, your point is well taken that the length of games is a big problem and the Commissioner's office is aggressively trying to tackle that with rule changes which will also include a pitch clock. They also imposed a mound visit rule which seems to have had limited impact, if any.

MLB has a contract with Rawlings on baseballs so it is within MLB's ability to control the baseballs and I suspect there will be some changes to the core of the balls.

The problem with increasing strikeouts and HRs was also borne from teams teaching hitters about launch angles and changing their swings to induce more fly balls and upper cut swings. So part of it is traceable to changes in coaching which in turn are due to technological advances in being able to analyze swing arcs and results.

One other thing about the game Friday night is that 362 pitches were thrown in part because the Yankees have a lineup of savages who aggressively work counts, and they do this regularly in big and important games. You may have seen the Manager of the Yankees, Aaron Boone, in a celebrated rant which praised this team tendency of the Yankees:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbSfJLF_0-8

It will be interesting to see what the rule changes will do to reduce game times.
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
The numerosity of pitching changes is prolonging games. That’s why the minimum 3 batter rule is coming into the game for all pitching changes. No more one batter and done.

I think that the 3 batter rule is a bit much. Sometimes a guy comes in and cannot find the strike zone. This is really going to be something. To a certain extent, the games are what they are. I don't think that there will be a bunch of new fans because they trim off 10 minutes of game time. Remember, to some fans, some of the more boring games are pitcher's duels or contests where there is no offense and those are quicker games. Ever go to a men's fast-pitch softball game?

Your video reminds me of another item: I would like to see the strike zone automated. I know that the umpires bring a human element that would be missed but still...the game is supposed to be decided by the players and managers and not the umpires.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I agree with you on the 3 batter rule. I don’t like it. One guy who is potentially harshly penalized is Dellin Betances of the Yankees. Betances has been among the most dominant relievers in baseball over the last 5 years, but he is 6’’8” and as with other taller pitchers, every so often his mechanics get so out of whack that he needs to be immediately removed. If he is in one of those mechanical funks, the potential exists to walk all 3 batters he faces and maybe even wild pitch 2 of them home. You don’t want anyone to be forced to watch a trainwreck in progress.

I also agree on the automated strike zone. The YES network already does it. It’s quite likely they have the TV with the YES network feed in the dugout so Boone and the Yankees players saw in real time exactly what was in that video. Of course, once complete automation happens the home plate umpire is not needed for calling balls and strikes. But still would be needed for plays at the plate and calling bunts fair or foul.
 

sharkman

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2018
803
397
93
Pothole City
.....But since Rawlings hasn't been able to find a drop in substitute or a way to eliminate the mid, how could it be?

I wonder about the issue of homers on the upswing. What could it be? They went to maple bats....

There was a previous thread on baseball that was wiped out for unknown reasons where I introduced the notion that maple bats (which supplanted ash bats as the bats of choice for sluggers) contributed largely to the big increase in home runs since the Barry Bonds days!

Add to that a juiced up ball this year...and it makes for an explosive cocktail!...lol!
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,857
552
113
There was a previous thread on baseball that was wiped out for unknown reasons where I introduced the notion that maple bats (which supplanted ash bats as the bats of choice for sluggers) contributed largely to the big increase in home runs since the Barry Bonds days!

Add to that a juiced up ball this year...and it makes for an explosive cocktail!...lol!

http://www.leaderboard.com/glossary_ironbyron

Doesn't baseball have anything like golf's Iron Byron? It is a robot used to test equipment to see if there is an advantage gained. Did they ever test maple vs ash?
New vs old baseball?
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Maple bats have been in the game for a long time now, and the dramatic uptick in home runs has happened in just the past few years. IMHO the bats have nothing to do with it, and the core of the ball plays some small role. However as I mentioned earlier, technological advances in analyze swing arcs and the results they produce in terms of launch angles and exit velocities have led to changes in how players are coached. The hitting philosophies being taught at both the major and minor league levels are geared towards producing certain launch angles and exit velocities which has been a primary impetus in teams setting major league records for HRs in the last 2 years. I believe 13 Major League teams this year broke team records for home runs. Maple bats did not come into the game in the last 2 years, they have been around much longer.

It is all about changes in hitting techniques, which include players altering their swings to induce more lift and also to pull the ball more. For the same reasons, shifting in MLB, designed to counteract changes to swing arcs and victimize dead pull hitters, have been widely implemented and have served to neutralize some notorious dead pull hitters who are incapable of opposite field hitting with any kind of power. The prime example of this is the Orioles' Chris Davis who, despite having a 7 year contract for $150,000,000, in the last 2 years has batted .168 (establishing the modern major league record low batting average) and .179:

ttps://www.baseball-reference.com/players/d/davisch02.shtml

Most better power hitters in the major leagues now can homer to all fields, although some (like the Yankees Brett Gardner) must pull the ball to HR. Gardner this year at age 36, on a 1 year contract for $7 million (which is 4th outfielder money), hit a career high 28 homers:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=gardne001bre

Pitchers are confused on how to pitch Gardner. If you pitch him outside, he will slap the ball into left field for soft opposite field hits. He does not really have any opposite field power at all. However, if you pitch him inside, and leave the ball over the plate, he will crush and murder fastballs with power and pull the ball for deep HRs.

I think most fans would have taken 8 HRs in part time duty from Gardner, who is a premium defensive outfielder who can play all OF positions. Due to injuries primarily to Giancarlo Stanton and Aaron Hicks, he was forced to start most games in LF and CF, and he did not appear to wear down and in fact I believe he led the American League in HRs in September with 10 (or was leading at the very end).
 

sharkman

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2018
803
397
93
Pothole City
Maple bats have been in the game for a long time now, and the dramatic uptick in home runs has happened in just the past few years. IMHO the bats have nothing to do with it, and the core of the ball plays some small role.

Really, the core of the baseball - which I think is the biggest determining factor in the surge in home runs since 1976 - only plays a small role!!!...Are you kidding me!

Then how else do you explain that in one year after the number of home runs in MLB was consistently under 3000 for years....the number of home runs skyrocketed overnight by 64%, going from 2200 in 1976 to 3600 in 1977 ???....Enlighten me EB!....Maybe every MLB player started to eat "Reggie Bars" before a ball game!

https://www.baseball-almanac.com/hitting/hihr6.shtml

I wonder how juiced up the ball was on October 18, 1977, in the sixth game of the World Series against the Dodgers, when the Yankees Reggie Jackson hit three home runs in a row off of three consecutive pitches from three different pitchers!
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,240
2,550
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
You are talking about since 1976 but the surge has happened in the last few years, with 13 teams setting a team record for HRs this year. It is the trickle down effect of the things I mentioned which started with Statcast in 2015. Exit velos and launch angles were not measured before then. Baseball reacted to that change in technology by figuring out what swings produced what launch angles and exit velocities. There are numerous companies making a lot of money selling this type of technology to MLB teams. It started in 2015 with Statcast. That was the real turning point. Now teams buy computer software which can simulate all kinds of things and also enable players to analyze their own swing arcs on laptop computers. Tons of money is being made on this.

I heard the Mets are heavily invested in some company that is selling a software that assists with pitch recognition as well. Also can be viewed by a player on laptop computer.
 
Toronto Escorts