It's always been entertaining when someone says more people get killed by something they can't prevent (lightning) then suggest people shouldn't do anything about those deadly risks they can prevent (pit bulls) because only a few get killed. Yeah, it's harder to empathize with the few who died when there's no ties to them or no emotional stake in the loss. No one but the family need care, right. Don't have foresight to help prevent the next attack, right.
More entertaining is this somehow became a libby versus conservative thing. Huh??? Is there a biased agenda to everything?
How about looking at it as a person got killed by a deadly animal. No relative death comparisons, no cynically making everything political.
Animal kills person. Animal put down. If an owner was negligent the owner pays legally. What in some peoples minds has that to do with lightning or libbys. Do we need to exploit death for political agendas.
It shows where some empathize and some want some agenda mileage out of it.
The pit bull was designed to be an attack animal for hundreds of years. That's not political. It's fact. Because it was bred into a weapon it should be mandatory for owners to be trained to raise and handle them as it should be for similar breeds. The German Shepard next door is an excellent guard dog as it was designed. When I park my car next door to the dog it often comes to the property line to let me and anyone know where they cannot trespass. There's no fence, just a line of trees that does not prevent the dog from coming toward anyone but the TRAINED animal stays put. That's how the situation should be handled with effective training for owner and dog. Human and animal training, and whatever deterrents (containment if needed) depending on the breed.
Cheers
More entertaining is this somehow became a libby versus conservative thing. Huh??? Is there a biased agenda to everything?
How about looking at it as a person got killed by a deadly animal. No relative death comparisons, no cynically making everything political.
Animal kills person. Animal put down. If an owner was negligent the owner pays legally. What in some peoples minds has that to do with lightning or libbys. Do we need to exploit death for political agendas.
Also, as I think this thread shows, those who have either been attacked or had friends attacked (as I have) may have a different perspective. Like jalimon, I stick to the friendly, goofy, sweet breed of dogs.
It shows where some empathize and some want some agenda mileage out of it.
The pit bull was designed to be an attack animal for hundreds of years. That's not political. It's fact. Because it was bred into a weapon it should be mandatory for owners to be trained to raise and handle them as it should be for similar breeds. The German Shepard next door is an excellent guard dog as it was designed. When I park my car next door to the dog it often comes to the property line to let me and anyone know where they cannot trespass. There's no fence, just a line of trees that does not prevent the dog from coming toward anyone but the TRAINED animal stays put. That's how the situation should be handled with effective training for owner and dog. Human and animal training, and whatever deterrents (containment if needed) depending on the breed.
Cheers