Montrealxxxtase
Montreal Escorts

My first STD

hobbier

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2003
1,592
970
113
Visit site
You seem to think SPs make a shit ton of money as if there wasn’t a massive physical and psychological cost to having countless strangers use their bodies every week. That mindset is fucked up.
hey..What a stupid and unrelated comment ......its their choice to play with strangers and It seems you dont know they have access to free tests...you better stay quiet if you dont know better
 
Last edited:

x5fq

Member
May 19, 2026
48
17
8
46
hey..What a stupid and unrelated comment ......its their choice to play with strangers and It seems you dont know they have access to free tests...you better stay quiet if you dont know better
Calling my comment "unrelated" doesn't make it unrelated.

You're the one who brought up "high fees" in your initial argument for why testing should be more frequent, and then later shifted to "it's free" as if that removes the relevance of what you said before.

So the question is simple: why introduce income in the first place if your position is that cost doesn't actually matter in determining testing frequency ? Either it's a relevant factor in your reasoning, or it isn't. Right now it's being used selectively depending on what supports the point.

Exposure risk can justify more frequent screening. That part is not in dispute. But income has no medical relevance to how often testing is required, so using "they make good money" as a basis for "no excuse" is not a health argument, it's a value judgment.

And that's exactly why my original comment wasn't "unrelated". Once you start framing expectations around what people earn and what they "should be able to afford", you're no longer just talking about medical guidelines, you're also implicitly talking about pressure, assumptions, and how you view the people doing the work.

And "they chose it" is such an oversimplified argument. A lot of women in that industry are there because of financial desperation, coercion, abusive situations, trafficking, addiction, or lack of options.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: just_a_effing_guy

just_a_effing_guy

New Member
Mar 28, 2026
8
9
3
Maaaan... We can tell you haven't spoken to SPs overall... They say that ignorance is a bliss but in your case, we can see that you need some proper education. Don't talk about things that you're clearly unaware of, because it'll look bad on you.

Honestly, here's my advice : don't presume ANYTHING from the sex work industry. We don't know jack shit from THEIR perspective so perhaps it's better for you to just close your mouth and listen to them, the SP. You might learn a thing or two, maybe.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: M.Pablo

hobbier

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2003
1,592
970
113
Visit site
Calling my comment "unrelated" doesn't make it unrelated.

You're the one who brought up "high fees" in your initial argument for why testing should be more frequent, and then later shifted to "it's free" as if that removes the relevance of what you said before.

So the question is simple: why introduce income in the first place if your position is that cost doesn't actually matter in determining testing frequency ? Either it's a relevant factor in your reasoning, or it isn't. Right now it's being used selectively depending on what supports the point.

Exposure risk can justify more frequent screening. That part is not in dispute. But income has no medical relevance to how often testing is required, so using "they make good money" as a basis for "no excuse" is not a health argument, it's a value judgment.

And that's exactly why my original comment wasn't "unrelated". Once you start framing expectations around what people earn and what they "should be able to afford", you're no longer just talking about medical guidelines, you're also implicitly talking about pressure, assumptions, and how you view the people doing the work.

And "they chose it" is such an oversimplified argument. A lot of women in that industry are there because of financial desperation, coercion, abusive situations, trafficking, addiction, or lack of options.
anyhow..this is all non sense..not sure what you are doing in this board, as I could not found a single review from you...but, I could read that you are a strong defender for the sp...
 

Lunaseraphim

Of the moon
Supporting Member
Jul 18, 2024
2,794
9,463
113
32
Montréal
www.lunasparx.com
my take on this is as a provider one test every month is not enough. If you make a living of being a sp, and having high fees, multiple tests per month should be a standard.
Yeah I wish I could get tested every week but there's not enough space in clinics and resources .. maybe stop asking for bare services and we will be ok
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Michelle Gunn

Matos

Member
Apr 29, 2007
180
12
18
It s really hard to me to see a woman after seeing this :(
1780103504107.png
 

kkrack

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2018
320
325
63
Yeah I wish I could get tested every week but there's not enough space in clinics and resources .. maybe stop asking for bare services and we will be ok
I use prelib plenty of facilities they do check everything it takes 15 minutes and it costs 15 bucks. For someone who does this kind of work I am surprised you don't know this service.
 
Ashley Madison