Nice la Presse Article on XO this morning

[Julia Sky]

Alcohol is not criminalized but you can only buy strong alcohol at SAQ and restaurants selling alcohol need to pay for government permit. If your activity is decriminalized it must be regulated as any other economic activity. You must provide documentation (ledgers etc) that reflects your cash flow and the buisiness expenses and fill all the tax documents required for small non-incorporated business. You would also need to pay GST/QST if your activity exceeds $30K/year. For this you need to charge your clients GST/QST on top of your price. There is no way that you can avoid government control and regulations that are mandatory for any small businesses (permits, health issues etc). How you can justify that you can be free from it while hairdresser working at his salon is not. What I am trying to say is that decriminalization and legalization is the same thing.
Government would also push you to move away from pure cash operation and you should be able to accept interact and credit cards payments.

Alcohol and weed are legalized, not decriminalized, case in point. They are not the same thing.

Escorts already have to pay taxes. In fact you're going to shit yourself when you learn there's already a business code for escorting specifically!!

We dont charge the tax on top of our rate - it is factored in. The same way plenty of professionals don't explicitly charge it but it's factored in the price.

Also many businesses aren't regulated in this manner. There are general laws that apply to everyone, but not every single industry has industry specific mandatory rules...

 

[EagerBeaver]

I’m not an attorney but I’ve followed enough US cases similar to this one. See my post regarding JuliesNYC. The conventional wisdom is that the XO group reopens once all this gets resolved. It’s usually about the Benjamin’s (or the Canadian equivalent), and the prosecutors will want to see some CAD forked over.

These types of cases pop up in the US quite a bit, and in vast majority the penalties are paid ….and the owners regroup with the next iteration.

It’s mind boggling the paranoia around clients numbers being investigated, etc. Cue the movie scene: “I am shocked to learn pimping and prostitution were taking place!”

I agree with you and that's exactly what I was suggesting. I could be wrong but it's my sense of what will happen.

 

[Julia Sky]

I honestly can't believe this thread has now reached 40 pages

 

[EagerBeaver]

I honestly can't believe this thread has now reached 40 pages

Probably a 5 day record for MERB. Just a guess. I don't recall any threads more explosive that did not get shut down. I am not suggesting that this thread should be shut down, but usually in the past threads that had heavy debate eventually did for one reason or another. I think the XO story fostered debate on many different issues surrounding how agencies operate, and it's a good thing to have these debates. In my estimation this thread has had healthy and thoughtful debate and contributions from MANY posters including the SPs, the clients and even an "anonymous" agency owner.

 

[CLOUD 500]

proxenetism? You need a phd to read this board now!

Another word for pimping.

 

[AnthonyAnderson]

proxenetism? You need a phd to read this board now!

We need one to understand what an @interferon is, too

(in French we say "proxénétisme" in everyday speak)

 

[PatHibulaire]

I honestly can't believe this thread has now reached 40 pages

Yes it is a long thread. I hope clients take the time to reflect on their « hobby ». Sex work is no ordinary business. I'm not getting an haircut or having a tooth treatment. I'm engaging in what most people consider to be the most intimate interaction between 2 people. As a client, I am very grateful to the SP's that I see and I always treat them with great respect.

 

[Flabert]

We don't know what the evidence is and we don't know what is easy to prove or not. What the law states is:

Benefiting from Sexual Services (Material Benefit - s. 286.2): It is an indictable offence, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, to receive a financial or material benefit knowing it is derived from the commission of a sexual service offence (such as someone buying sex).

Inducing/Procuring (s. 286.3): It is illegal to induce, recruit, or direct a person to offer sexual services, including directing someone into the sex trade.

Advertising Sexual Services (s. 286.4): It is a criminal offence to knowingly advertise the sale of sexual services, such as online, in print, or through other media.

Just because 10 years is a possible penalty doesn't mean any of them will get any jail time. It's all to be determined in Court. Witnesses fold, don't cooperate, do not show. Disappear. Happens all the time. And then the prosecutor bails. Look at what happened with the witnesses in the Canada Hockey case. They were awful, and the case collapsed.

Awful is one way to put it. The crown could not do the right thing because of the optics (white privileged hockey player abusing a woman) but it backfired because her story was mostly false (so no credibility could be attributed to her according to the female judge).

It was impossible to say the plaintiff (we can’t legally use victim anymore) had not fabricated every event she alleged happened. Even trivial details turned out to be false.

I understand the desire to look good but this set back real victims. Lesson applies everytime, do not lie.

The one thing that was real is the cheque she cashed.

 

[Flabert]

Yes it is a long thread. I hope clients take the time to reflect on their « hobby ». Sex work is no ordinary business. I'm not getting an haircut or having a tooth treatment. I'm engaging in what most people consider to be the most intimate interaction between 2 people. As a client, I am very grateful to the SP's that I see and I always treat them with great respect.

Yes, we want this industry to be healthy and positive for all involved most importantly the providers. True first responders!

 

[RobertNYC]

Just read this report this morning and to be honest this is one of the biggest reasons I don't like dealing with agencies. There are too many risky variables. Their website is still live too (will probably get shut down in the coming months) but yeah stay away from this place

I can’t speak for Canadian prosecutors, but I don’t think they give a rats ass about the website itself. I’ve seen homepages stay up post busts in US. It appears XO attorneys haven’t advised the owners to take it down, and that’s telling in a way. That could imply confidence and presumed holes in prosecutors case, maybe.

Again, prosecutors aren’t targeting clients so I’m not sure of your reluctance to use agencies, at least from an LE perspective.