Senate impeachment circus

[C.B. Brown]

If you only knew who I am meeting tomorrow you would be fine as well

I am trying to care........ but its just not working.
aside from purposely trying to annoy people do you ever make any contributions or is that beneath you.
[h=3]Trump fires two major impeachment figures [/h][h=1]Alexander Vindman and Gordon Sondland revenge is best served up cold[/h]

 

[Sol Tee Nutz]

Ho yes I am fine... If you only knew who I am meeting tomorrow you would be fine as well

Greta??????

 

[The Nature Boy]

Lemme tell u something. If I was that Pelosi chic and that fucker shummer, I’d totally just say fuck it to the presidential
election. None of these fuckers will have a chance against DJT. He will slaughter each, Bloomberg, make Biden look weak and timid and just bitch slap Bernie all over the place. Best, he will do it with absolutely no in depth knowledge of any of the issues @ hand. The dems should focus on capturing both houses of Congress and impeaching trump again. There’s no way he’s not gonna do something fucking stupid. I imagine pence is prob praying for a dem sweep @
congressional level.

 

[C.B. Brown]

Lemme tell u something. If I was that Pelosi chic and that fucker shummer, I’d totally just say fuck it to the presidential
election. None of these fuckers will have a chance against DJT. He will slaughter each, Bloomberg, make Biden look weak and timid and just bitch slap Bernie all over the place. Best, he will do it with absolutely no in depth knowledge of any of the issues @ hand. The dems should focus on capturing both houses of Congress and impeaching trump again. There’s no way he’s not gonna do something fucking stupid. I imagine pence is prob praying for a dem sweep @
congressional level.

Drain the swamp donald drain the swamp,.....
Pelosi is 79 and seriously she looks like she is mental rambles to herself 1 eye goes 1 way the other a different direction you could have a award winning circus with these clowns don't forget adam schiff
what a piece of work

 

[purplem]

They don,t like fact he is president- Too bad get over it over 65 million americans voted for him

Wow- over 65 million! Not bad! Only a mere three million fewer than the ones who voted for his opponent H. Clinton.

 

[Bred Sob]

Only a mere three million fewer than the ones who voted for his opponent H. Clinton.

Right on point as always. Long live President H.Clinton!

 

[purplem]

Why won't you try to take a look at the news headlines once in a while, you even might find it interesting, who knows.

Trump fires Gordon Sondland, the second impeachment witness to be removed from his post Friday

Trump defends firing impeachment witness Alexander Vindman

And so on...

Sometimes you may find something worthy if you get lucky.

It's true! You might! For example, you might find that YOUR references were to Congress...but that the SENATE refused to have witnesses for the proceedings in which Trumpie was - if you'll pardon the expression - "acquitted". Nice try though.

 

[Bred Sob]

For example, you might find that YOUR references were to Congress... Nice try though.

Those who can read might have concluded that my references were to WITNESSES. That were absent from the proceedings altogether, if we are to believe jalimon. Thank you for setting us straight though.

And thank you for your heartwarming compliment. I am always trying my best.

 

[purplem]

Right on point as always. Long live President H.Clinton!

I will make an exception to my policy of ignoring your typical sarcasm to attempt to explain to you (despite knowing that explanations to you and CBB are a waste of time) by stating that yes, it WAS, as usual, "right on point", since your ally CBB had bragged about the number of Americans who voted for your hero with the orange makeup and I correctly mentioned that Trumpie actually received three million FEWER votes than his female opponent did.

Since, as always, you will not have a viable factual response, by all means go ahead and offer us some more of your annoying, repetitive and unamusing sarcasm. Don't expect a reply from me. I've already wasted too much time on you and CBB.

 

[Bred Sob]

I've already wasted too much time on you and CBB.

Yes, I know, it is annoying as hell that this thread is also open to people who are actually known to make sense, at least occasionally. I feel your pain.

I correctly mentioned...

I am very glad to hear that. There is always a first time for everything.

 

[GMA]

It's true! You might! For example, you might find that YOUR references were to Congress...but that the SENATE refused to have witnesses for the proceedings in which Trumpie was - if you'll pardon the expression - "acquitted". Nice try though.

Trump's "trial" by the Senate must have been the only trial in US history where the defense was permitted to prevent any and all witnesses from testifying, and prevent any and all documents to be presented as evidence.
The nation's worst defense attorney would be batting 1.000 if he/she could try all their cases under such ridiculous conditions.
And every criminal would be unjustly acquitted; just like POTUS Trump.
And what is the excuse all you Trump apologists have for POTUS refusing to testify under oath at a show trial run by his Republican allies? If he were truly innocent, then let him stand in front of the American people and swear to it on the Bible under oath. It's because he is guilty as guilty gets

 

[C.B. Brown]

I've already wasted too much time on you and CBB.

Well we are in agreement......We concur...... you have wasted too much time..
Back to the puzzle factory for you!

 

[C.B. Brown]

Trump's "trial" by the Senate must have been the only trial in US history where the defense was permitted to prevent any and all witnesses from testifying, and prevent any and all documents to be presented as evidence.
The nation's worst defense attorney would be batting 1.000 if he/she could try all their cases under such ridiculous conditions.
And every criminal would be unjustly acquitted; just like POTUS Trump.
And what is the excuse all you Trump apologists have for POTUS refusing to testify under oath at a show trial run by his Republican allies? If he were truly innocent, then let him stand in front of the American people and swear to it on the Bible under oath. It's because he is guilty as guilty gets

The prosecution is the one who denied due process for President Donald Trump and his lawyers.This was never about law or what is right ......it was dirty politics at its most disgusting.I try to lower my intellect to a point where i can converse with you but id end in a coma .
your rant is filled with no truths
GMA news flash innocent men don't have to prove their innocence . accusers have to prove their guilt.
Back to cleaning test tubes

 

[jalimon]

Since, as always, you will not have a viable factual response, by all means go ahead and offer us some more of your annoying, repetitive and unamusing sarcasm. Don't expect a reply from me. I've already wasted too much time on you and CBB.

Purplem as i do from time to time i put them on ignore list and only respond when more interesting post from others come along. Its the only way to keep it sane with all their non sense. cheers

 

[C.B. Brown]

Purplem as i do from time to time i put them on ignore list and only respond when more interesting post from others come along. Its the only way to keep it sane with all their non sense. cheers

You actually find posts to stimulate that area between your ears.Please share with us i have not had a good laugh in days.
Back on subject as when some flatter each other they tend to get carried away.
i love this tweet by president donald trump
When I terminated John Kelly, which I couldn’t do fast enough, he knew full well that he was way over his head. Being Chief of Staff just wasn’t for him. He came in with a bang, went out with a whimper, but like so many X’s, he misses the action & just can’t keep his mouth shut,.

 

[Bred Sob]

as i do from time to time i put them on ignore list

Is there any chance I could stay on your ignore list permanently? It would really help to reduce the clutter on this board, as some of us have already found with your best buddy. Thanks a bunch in advance!

 

[C.B. Brown]

from time to time i put them on ignore list

Are you bragging or complaining your rants are so monotone its hard to tell the difference.
back on subject.
Trump accused of another quid pro quo, this time with New York
State attorney general Letitia James seems to be the new witch hunter

And if pigs flew we would be shooting for our pork.

 

[Bred Sob]

Trump accused of another quid pro quo, this time with new york

I think we can expect a serious competition for the subject matter of the next impeachment. It is imperative that things are done in an honest transparent manner. For starters, I suppose, someone needs to get the bidding process going.

 

[C.B. Brown]

I think we can expect a serious competition for the subject matter of the next impeachment. It is imperative that things are done in an honest transparent manner. For starters, I suppose, someone needs to get the bidding process going.

Well they say smart people learn from their mistakes.
At what point do the people get fed up with false accusations.
Democrats are all willing to go down with the ship,which i could help expedite the process.
or as President Donald Trump says..''drain the swamp''

 

[GMA]

Purplem as i do from time to time i put them on ignore list and only respond when more interesting post from others come along. Its the only way to keep it sane with all their non sense. cheers

Yes Purplem and Jalimon: CB Brown and Bred Sob have been on my ignore list for some time now. They don't even pretend to make serious arguments to support their positions. Just a lot of mindless grade school sarcasm, taunts, personal attacks, and misinformation.
If they ever start to make some worthwhile contributions to support their positions, then let me know and perhaps I'll check them out again. But I'm not holding my breath.