Saying your reaction was homophobic was one of playing the odds about the possible motivation of your response. Seemed like an unreasonable response. I appreciate that it is a normal occurence on the boards for people to express strong opinions on something they know nothing about or haven't tried but to be so black and white and insulting certainly implied deeper seeded issues.
I never meant to suggest it was an obligation and I don't believe I did. It was however a suggestion for those that wanted to understand the feeling. A completion of the knowledge data base on the subject. It certainly is completely foreign to any other sensation or activity that we men will likely experience. You have a point that, in fact, it may be of little value when doing sp's that regularly engage in anal and are easily and routinely stretched. If, however, one wants to have anal with inexperienced civies the knowledge is quite useful I have found. I now understand their apprehension and that initial feeling. I can also say to them with certainty that with proper preparation it can be done with a minimum of initial discomfort.
Stimulation of the prostate is well documented so it seemed like an opportune time to kill two birds with one stone so to speak. The strap-on thing I did once about a year ago and it didn't make my top ten list of things to repeat but in the context of a "bucket list" it seemed quite rationale , even in retrospect. Digital prostate massage, on the other hand, is something that I find can give you a mind-blowing orgasm particulary combined with a BJ. I have repeated this many times. It is also particularly good for those times where you find it difficult to finish, so to speak.
Hello Possum Trot,
I have a strong feeling I know exactly who your experience was with since we know one very well known escort we have met in common, who also hinted of doing the same thing with me by saying she has done this and enjoyed it with other men. She is not the only escort to mention this option when I ask, what do you enjoy? While some other options mentioned were definitely tantalizing, my response to any strapon offer to me was "I would definitely never be interested in that"...as politely as I could say it.
It's not anyone's place to inject their judgment onto what two or more consenting adults willingly enjoy together. If it was brought up openly for discussion, in some aspect, then there would be an invitation for opinions if one was so inclined. But, if anyone suggested any negative opinion automatically amounts to a phobia, then it is more likely they have the problem. Just because someone has "black and white" views on a prospective situation without precisely experiencing it does not make those views a phobia. Everyone has learned preferences, tastes, and desires, as well as strong instinctive natural impulses creating very definite views and feelings about most prospective situations, and all of that is as valid in having an opinion and an understanding of an experience as actually having the experience. For example, if instinct tells one it's repulsive to him or her to be sodomized there is no need to prove it by having the experience, and no need to justify instincts to anyone else. It's a preference, not a phobia.
Your suggestion that one should experience the other side of certain specific "feelings" might be considered commendable for it's willingness to share physical empathy, but to suggest a matching physical experience is necessary to understand how a sex partner or how anyone feels in a given situation is debatable. It underestimates the impact and value of instinct and the capacity for cognitive empathy through related similar experiences. Obviously physical experience provides fuller understanding, but it's not necessary for real general understanding. If one has experienced a feeling such as satisfaction or pain in other forms, there is no need to experience every possibility to appreciate what each specific experience would or might be like. No one needs to complete the "knowledge data base on the subject" to appreciate it for what it's like, especially when it's instinctively undesirable or repulsive.
I think it should be a requirement for every guy that wants greek to get the strap-on treatment first to get some idea of what she is feeling and how important prep is.
Yes, I overreacted yesterday. To imply it was about a phobia or unresolved inner issues was over the top and insulting. I did some of the latter too, then retracted for that error. But, this thread was intended to simply ask: "is Greek something that a Hobbyist needs to experience at least once in his life". Yet, it was insinuated that those clients who have greek with a woman might be or are ignorant of the pain, indifferent about it, or, by loose extension in some way even enjoy inflicting it. I found the implication of any of these possibilities very offensive. And while the concept that a sex partner should have the same experience to share physical empathy is philosophically commendable, the idea by you that: "it should be a
requirement(ie..obligation) for every guy that wants greek to get the strap-on treatment first to get some idea of what she is feeling", implying regardless of whether it's repulsive or not, is an unjustifiable imposition. Perhaps this "requirement" was not your real intention, but it was very pointed as written.
THE KEY POINT: this thread is about willing partners, partners in pleasure, NOT pain which has been the implication made by more than one suggestion in this thread. No one interested in greek with a woman here ever suggested or implied there was any desire to inflict discomfort or pain, and implying that there ever was is out of bounds. Naturally anyone seeking greek knows to be sensitive and careful. But, if any escort is offering greek when it is painful to her that is her, in my view, stupid choice; and anyone's view that a client should be "required" to also experience her discomfort or pain to empathize with what is essentially a very poor choice is...nonsense...IMHO!
Cheers,
Merlot