Want this guy as a Canada PM?
Being himself a Wacko some may claim he knows what he is talking about...
Not so sure..
Being himself a Wacko some may claim he knows what he is talking about...
Not so sure..
SILLY POILIÈVRE and the Canadian Conservative Party
- Thread starter Like_It_Hot
- Start date
Did you see the actual session ? Poilievre was asking about the request of the BC PM who wants Trudeau to stop the legalization of hard drugs in his province. As a result hundreds of people have died. On 3 occasions Trudeau did not answer the question at all and insulted Poilievre and suggested he was a white supremacist etc... (as usual). Visibly irritated Polievre talked about a whaco policy (on drugs) and a wacko PM. The President of the House (Greg Fergus, a diehard :iberal) asked Poilievre to change his statement, and he removed the term whaco and replaced it by extremist. This was not enough for Fergus, who expelled Poilievre based only on the intention of discrediting him. Check the Session, don't take my word for it. By the way, I have been voting liberal in every election for 20 years, never again
Thousands of people dying from fentanyl. Nothing to do with what you pretend. I never voted liberal. You did vote Liberal for twenty years... Time to question yourself on what you make your mind.
You are opening your eyes but you are looking on the bad direction.
By the way I saw what happened and there is no excuse for the irresponsible way Poilièvre did behave.
You are opening your eyes but you are looking on the bad direction.
By the way I saw what happened and there is no excuse for the irresponsible way Poilièvre did behave.
Yes 70% of Canadians want Trudeau out asap, it’s gonna be a majority win for the Conservatives in the coming election.
Québec is the only province where the Liberals are still relevant but even there the useless Bloc Québécois is ahead of them, everywhere else Canadians are supporting Pierre Poilievre with great passion.
What Poilievre said was 100% correct, the PM is indeed a wacko. Now on a scale 1 to 10 with 10 being the worst on bad words, I would say that wacko is a two, somewhere close to spineless (Trudeau called Poilievre spineless). The reality is I never seen such partisanship from a speaker. Greg Fergus should do the right thing and step down. There is no way he can do his job credibly. Greg Fergus did a big mistake in booting Poilievre out of the house of commons, Greg Fergus should have left it at that when Polievre said he withdraws, but Greg Fergus went after Poilievre. What I predict, this incident will likely boost Poilievre's popularity.
And how about Greg Fergus? He lost all credibility as the speaker of the house, totally insecure and biased. I voted liberal all this time because as an immigrant it was the natural thing to do, and always had to live hostility from Separatists at school and at the Job. And I thought Conservative are bigots who represent essentially the banks and the oil industry from the West. What do you mean I am looking on the bad direction? On the so called left the ndp and the liberals are now the same thing
Pourquoi changer de sujet? À court d'argument sur l'attitude enfantine et stupide de Poilièvre?
Ce thread est sur Poilièvre qui se prétend capable de mener un pays. Il n'est même pas capable de se contrôler et de se comporter dignement à la Chambre des Communes. Il se comporte comme un ado frustré dans une cour d'école. Assez les enfantillages.
You can say whatever you want. You are on a Forum part of an Escort Review Board. Can't you see the difference between what is said here and what is decent to say at a Parlement? I guess you don't make the difference. Think about it.
You miss the point replying to my question.
The question was Do you wants this silly guy? This guy being Poilièvre
You did not answer to the question.
You just said Canadian in vast majority reject Trudeau. You are right on this one.
But is it an excuse to vote for a Pure Idiot, right wing demagog?
Surely not, in my opinion. That's why I will support Jean-François Blanchet and Bloc Québécois.
Agreed, some of the stuff starting to emerge from the Liberal camp is troubling. Not the extremist hyperbolic screaming that far right of Poilievre's group keep pouring out, but the dribble dribble of nanny state authoritarism. Methinks many of the problems the Liberals have are sourced from an incompetent bureaucracy; firing the coach because the team sucks never solves the root problem. I think we need more radical approach but the loony Conservatives are not it. I'll be voting according to the character of the person standing in my riding. It'll have as much weight as any other decision making criterion.
You missed the entire point. The issue is with Greg Fergus's partisanship, that makes him unqualified to do his job. Poilievre withdrew what he said, why did Greg Fergus not stop there? And you do realize this will only make Pierre Poilievre more popular. Just think about it.
Last edited:
Lets put it this way, anyone is better then the current PM who is a far-left lunatic. Poilievre has his faults but he will be a better choice then Trudeau (the lesser of two evils). But I do not support either one, I was just saying that Poilievre is a better choice. My vote is for Tim Moen of the Libertarian Party of Canada. What we need is a very small government, elimination of taxes, termination of all social benefits, ending foreign aid, ending corporate welfare, etc..
Last edited:
Out of subject. Poilièvre conducted himself as a Pure Idiot. You may try to diverge attention toward someone else. being Fergus, the King or Joe Blow. It is not relevant to this thread about poilièvre. if you want to discuss Fergus, create an other thread. Simple as that. Think about it!
The issue is and will stay on Poilièvre.
The thread is about Silly Poilièvre and the Conservative Party
I did a short research on this Tim Moen... Impressively unefficient guy...
In 2015 that was his score... behind the Green Party. He got only 1% of the vote and spent $41,000 for that. What a failure.
It is interesting to note that the policies followed by the current Liberal administration have led to the gradual erosion of Canada as a leading player in global politics and a considerable drop in rank amongst the world's wealthiest countries.
It has become so bad in Canada that many recent arrivals(immigrants) and in particular, doctors and medical specialists are leaving the country in droves. Many of our cities are now open and festering wounds with homelessness, crime and drug addiction running rampant.
I recall the question that the Conservative leader asked of the PM in the House of Commons. It was related to a request by the NDP Premier of BC for Trudeau to reverse the decision to decriminalize hard drugs in BC. The question was not answered at all by Trudeau. This is astounding considering the number of Canadians that have died recently as a result of this one policy decision by Trudeau. Incredible!
I do not know if Poilievre will make a better PM than Trudeau. Still, I can see regardless of his "wacko" comment, that he would appear to have his head screwed on properly and is much more compassionate to the plight of addicted Canadians.
Frankly, I consider Trudeau to be a vain empty suit and I say this not only as a Canadian but as one who has met him personally, and remembers that encounter very well. We will be dealing with the wreckage of his policies for decades.
It has become so bad in Canada that many recent arrivals(immigrants) and in particular, doctors and medical specialists are leaving the country in droves. Many of our cities are now open and festering wounds with homelessness, crime and drug addiction running rampant.
I recall the question that the Conservative leader asked of the PM in the House of Commons. It was related to a request by the NDP Premier of BC for Trudeau to reverse the decision to decriminalize hard drugs in BC. The question was not answered at all by Trudeau. This is astounding considering the number of Canadians that have died recently as a result of this one policy decision by Trudeau. Incredible!
I do not know if Poilievre will make a better PM than Trudeau. Still, I can see regardless of his "wacko" comment, that he would appear to have his head screwed on properly and is much more compassionate to the plight of addicted Canadians.
Frankly, I consider Trudeau to be a vain empty suit and I say this not only as a Canadian but as one who has met him personally, and remembers that encounter very well. We will be dealing with the wreckage of his policies for decades.
Like Segmund Freud said "Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." It is wishful thinking, but the Canadian system is bipartisan just like the US, it is always Liberals vs Conservatives. People seem to think there is a difference between the left and right, in reality they are two sides of the same coin.
I said it many times, that prohibition never works. I am a firm believer in legalized drugs, legalized weapons, legalized prostitution, etc.. Why there is so much rampant drug use is because Trudeau caused a lot of poverty with his mass immigration policy. Usually single men are the most affected because they get no support from the government, apartments are so expensive that they end up in the streets. It used to be they would use in their own homes, now that they cannot find an affordable apartment they end up using on the streets. Poilievre's war on drugs explains why I say the left and right have more in common. Polievre is playing politics. Trudeau pushed for covid mandates, Poilievre starts a war on drugs. Ultimately it is peoples choice to use drugs, they must be accountable for their own actions. It is not government's job to play Grandma. On a final note, despite all that I said, Poilievre will be a big improvement. You just cannot do more worse then Trudeau, he really drove Canada into a hole and it will take decades to fix his mess. Poilievre will inherit big problems when he wins the elections which he will.
The issue is one of addiction to a substance in this case narcotics. One does not deal with the addiction by feeding the addiction at government expense and with tax dollars. It has led to countless deaths. BC is the current example. The medical establishment is up in arms as well as they bear the brunt of dealing with the carnage of addiction.
Deal with the addiction and provide addicts with the means to come clean with my tax dollars and become productive tax-paying citizens themselves. Don't give them a shovel to continue digging their graves. This is my belief and I know it is possible because someone helped me and did not enable me when I was in similar straights, and I am now a productive, healthy and successful tax-paying citizen.
Prohibition may never work as you say, there will always be a demand, but handing out free candy does not work and only makes misery, and ultimately death, more likely. It leads to additional problems for cities, the citizenry and the country itself. If this is not evident, take a long look around you at what has been accomplished by this disastrous policy, since it has become law.
If it is not the government's job to play "grandma" as you state, why are they handing out government-paid drugs and providing safe spaces for the addict to use? All in the name of harm reduction? Death is not harm reduction, it is final. The government is simply passing the buck and the problem of addiction, in so doing. They already are playing "grandma", goddam the pusher man!
With this I agree with you 100%. I am against providing government benefits to anyone else, no one is entitled to someone elses labor. What Trudeau is doing is madness. I am for limited government interference, in other words no prohibition but also no safe injection sites, safe spaces, or government paid drugs.
Ok I’m gonna use the proper formulation,
I support Pierre Poilievre as my next Prime Minister.
He is way more cool headed than the emotional Trudeau and showed he’s a good leader, as the #1 guy the Conservative Party is on a historic grind they are raising a boatload more money than the Liberals right now.
Calling Trudeau a wacko is meaningless, he retracted his word right away and called Trudeau an extremist, this mediocre at best house speaker was having a big power trip by throwing Poilievre out of the chamber.
The team of Trudeau-Freeland-Guilbeault is the worst leadership Canada have had since the Great Depression, they are driving the country into the abyss a change is inevitable.
I’m pretty sure Poilievre got under your skin that bad you won’t be able to resist using your vote against him on Election Day.
Similar threads
