Actually, he doesn't know the difference. Witness his calling Obama a "radical socialist." (BTW, I'm with you, well to the left of Obama.)BTW, could you please stop calling me a liberal. I am a socialist, not a liberal.
Actually, he doesn't know the difference. Witness his calling Obama a "radical socialist." (BTW, I'm with you, well to the left of Obama.)BTW, could you please stop calling me a liberal. I am a socialist, not a liberal.
Actually, he doesn't know the difference. Witness his calling Obama a "radical socialist." (BTW, I'm with you, well to the left of Obama.)
I bet you a lot of these girls are bought off the hidden wiki, you guys ever hear about the deep web? not to change the subject, but that sh1t bothers me really bad, especially to know that young girls are being trafficked and abused. what is wrong with the world today?
I did answer your question intelligently. Do you socialists read?
I bet you a lot of these girls are bought off the hidden wiki, you guys ever hear about the deep web? not to change the subject, but that sh1t bothers me really bad, especially to know that young girls are being trafficked and abused. what is wrong with the world today?
Absent Fox News having "reported" on it, he's kind of lost for an answer.Should I conclude that not responding to a question is, for you, answering intelligently?
Just as soon as Fox Noise feed him the party line, he'll get back to you with an answer. (Obama a radical socialist. ROFLMAO. Coming direct to you from Hannity's feeble brain to Daydreamer to you.)The question is: could you please explain to me how you come to the conclusion that if prostitution becomes illegal in Canada it will be because of the Liberal Party?
Absent Fox News having "reported" on it, he's kind of lost for an answer.
Just as soon as Fox Noise feed him the party line, he'll get back to you with an answer. (Obama a radical socialist. ROFLMAO. Coming direct to you from Hannity's feeble brain to Daydreamer to you.)
Should I conclude that not responding to a question is, for you, answering intelligently?
The question is: could you please explain to me how you come to the conclusion that if prostitution becomes illegal in Canada it will be because of the Liberal Party?
And you probably don't know much about US politics, so let me explain a couple of things.
1. The miracle of the Republican party is that they have managed for many years to get millions of people to vote against their own best interests. The Republican party represents the super-rich and large corporations; in fact, most Republican legislators are owned by large corporations. By playing to fear, religious zealotry, and sheer stupidity, they have managed to get millions to support their packages of tax incentives for the rich, for taxing earned income, but not inherited or investment income.
2. The Republican Party has their own "news" outlet, Fox News, or as we call it, Faux News. Faux News is run by Roger Ailes. Ailes was a media consultant for Republican presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush, as well as Rudy Giuliani’s first mayoral campaign in 1989. Ailes served as a political consultant for many Republican candidates during the 1960s, 70s and 80s. His first such job was as media advisor for the Nixon campaign in 1968. He returned to presidential campaigning as a consultant to Ronald Reagan in the latter stages of the 1984 campaign. He is widely credited with having helped coach Reagan to victory in the second presidential debate with Walter Mondale, after aides Richard Darman and David Stockman bungled preparations for the disastrous first debate.
In 1987 and 1988, Ailes was credited (along with Lee Atwater) with guiding George H. W. Bush to victory in the Republican primaries, and the later come-from-behind[7] victory over Michael Dukakis. Ailes scripted and (with Sig Rogich) produced the "Revolving Door" ad, as well as all of Bush's broadcast spots in the primary and general-election campaigns.
Ailes is the only hard-core political operative ever to front a so-called news operation.
Rumps adding nothing to the conversation, as always.
You haven't added anything to the thread, Rumple has clearly provided you with facts here. These are not wiki facts, these are confirmed facts. If you think it's "crap" then do some research for once and prove him wrong, you might end up learning something in the process. Don't try to dodge facts by politicizing them, you have a real bad habit of doing this. This isn't about Republicans and Democrats, this is about facts and facts are objective regardless of which ideology presents them. All we ask is for Fox News to provide the nation with objective news coverage, we don't have a problem with who runs it, as long as the content is objective. Fox News is not objective and as a result, it deliberately misleads the nation. No one can argue this unless they want to make a fool of themselves. Don't be a blind follower. You're a smart guy so take the time to research things and be more open minded. Don't be brainwashed, don't be a slave to a bullshit ideology, what a waste of intellect that would be.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/07/sold-for-sex-in-our-backyards/
“We have to stop the men. This is a very lucrative business,” Swain said.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/07/sold-for-sex-in-our-backyards/#ixzz1iovDYwTZ
I can't deny that it's wrong, but that doesn't make it right. The simple fact that its source is Fox News means that it's veracity is in question. Fox News is an agenda driven organization, doing the bidding of Roger Ailes, Rupert Murdoch, and the Republican Party.Deny the statement above.
I can't deny that it's wrong, but that doesn't make it right. The simple fact that its source is Fox News means that it's veracity is in question. Fox News is an agenda driven organization, doing the bidding of Roger Ailes, Rupert Murdoch, and the Republican Party.
Frankly, if you buy into any paranoid article promulgated on the interwebs by any spurious news source, of which Fox certainly is one, you'd better find yourself a bunker in which to spend the rest of your years.
This is amazing! this comes from the guy that says it is OK to make up data if your cause is just.
LOL. You mean the corporate media? What's ironic is that you have managed to omit the only broadcast news source that is truly left of center: MSNBC. The Walt Disney Co, which owns ABC and CNN is left of center? NBCUniversal is left of center? Viacom is left of center?CBS, CNN, AP, Reuters, ABC, NBC
Hungry,
This is sicko! Please show me anywhere I ever said it was "Ok to make up data if your cause is just"...or you are BOLD FACE FUCKING LIAR! I said: "who cares if the data is skewed." That has nothing to do with making up data. It's a simple acknowledgement that nearly all data is skewed to serve a purpose and nearly always slightly objective at least...not one letter suggesting data should be made up.
Why did you write this lie? Are you so lacking you can't keep your integrity like a grown man.
Disgusting,
Merlot
Hey DD,
Yes, I have. All.
Here are my objections for the last time:
1. Sex slavery for anyone, and pedophilia are an absolute evils. No one can deny that, so the right and wrong cannot be debated.
2. Sex service for adults by choice, even if you allow for a perfect world of rational, thoughtful, absolutely non-exploitative pure safe business conditions will always be morally debatable for a significant segment of the population whether religion enters into consideration or not.
3. If no one had any objections to number 2, everyone but pervs would object to number 1. Regardless of which side anyone takes on the adult free choice of providing sexual services, sex slavery and pedophilia are absolutely different subjects from adult free choice and the two issues should never be connected in discussion.
4. You and Hungry, so far, are exploiting the feelings against the absolute evil of sex slavery and pedophilia for your own purposes to attack feminists and anyone else who happens to think any paid sexual service, even if by free choice, is morally wrong. It's no better than holding children and helpless people hostage to get something else you want.
5. Whatever is going on in Sweden or anywhere else, or whatever your worries are about being able to continue receiving sexual adult services, it was absolutely wrong to in effect use the issue of sexual slavery and pedophilia to manipulate feelings on the issue of adult sexual service. It's was wrong for you, Hungry, feminists, liberals, conservatives, the Three Damn Stooges, or anyone else to do so because it's pure baiting demagoguery of the ugliest sort, (then of course some just don't give a damn how they handle an issue).
I can't say it any plainer. :noidea:
ADIEU!, :thumb:
Merlot
This is amazing! this comes from the guy that says it is OK to make up data if your cause is just.
My entire point was that this is a bull shit story and the kind of bull shit story that the public will eat up. What will be the end result? More grants to LE to set up stings to catch hobbyists like us that have nothing to do with trafficking or under aged sex workers.
Hungry,
This is sicko! Please show me anywhere I ever said it was "Ok to make up data if your cause is just"...or you are BOLD FACE FUCKING LIAR!
Why did you write this lie? Are you so lacking you can't keep your integrity like a grown man.
Coward,
Merlot
LOL. You mean the corporate media? What's ironic is that you have managed to omit the only broadcast news source that is truly left of center: MSNBC. The Walt Disney Co, which owns ABC and CNN is left of center? NBCUniversal is left of center? Viacom is left of center?
Hello Hungry,
And who cares if the data is skewed. The point is child exploitation for sex or anything is happening...it's happening worldwide, and should be fought regardless of any other element of sex.
Merlot