No correlation.
The there is no correlation to honestly earning money ( which not in itself slimey) to what Canseco has done. Are you saying that the average worker has earned their money through gross dishonest deception, then compounded their total flaunting of ethics by profiting from monumental hypocrisy??? Of course not...I hope. I am not contesting the truth of what he alleges, but his revelations sure don't come with clean hands. In a real court case he would be such a tainted witness that his testimony would be total crap without independent verification. We may need a guilty insider like Canseco to root out other offenders, but he is still slimey. If he hadn't blown the money he was paid as a player, as I understand it, I wonder where he would be on this issue...huh. In my view he is incredibly sleazy, especially because his testimony seems directly related to his financial condition before the revelations. However he may serve the ultimate interests of honest baseball by the exposure of some other dishonest players, his seeming profit orientation while doing so has the basic character of I described in my previous post.
My view,
Korbel
Hello madmax,madmax said:I have no admiration for Canseco, and his motivation was obviously profit and not justice. But then how many of us do our jobs for altruistic motives? Obviously most of us do our jobs for "the slimey money," though most of us wouldn't call it "whoring." (That's the ladies job! )
I don't admire his motivations or his character, but I reiterate that he told the truth, and none of us would be as well informed about the steriod situation if he hadn't done so. Not a defense -- just a description of his actions.
The there is no correlation to honestly earning money ( which not in itself slimey) to what Canseco has done. Are you saying that the average worker has earned their money through gross dishonest deception, then compounded their total flaunting of ethics by profiting from monumental hypocrisy??? Of course not...I hope. I am not contesting the truth of what he alleges, but his revelations sure don't come with clean hands. In a real court case he would be such a tainted witness that his testimony would be total crap without independent verification. We may need a guilty insider like Canseco to root out other offenders, but he is still slimey. If he hadn't blown the money he was paid as a player, as I understand it, I wonder where he would be on this issue...huh. In my view he is incredibly sleazy, especially because his testimony seems directly related to his financial condition before the revelations. However he may serve the ultimate interests of honest baseball by the exposure of some other dishonest players, his seeming profit orientation while doing so has the basic character of I described in my previous post.
My view,
Korbel
Last edited: