There's a new paper up on SocArXiv: The Changing Meaning Of “No” In Canadian Sex Work Advertising: Peace of Mind, Safety and Race
This looked at what words people put after "No" in sex work ads over a 15 year period. An emerging theme was the exclusion of Men of Color in advertising. This is particularly pronounced in Ontario and it looks like its almost exclusively female workers who employ this type of restriction.
Looking at the ads there's really a debate going on about this with some advertisers explicitly stating that everyone is welcome. While less prevalent there are also sometimes restrictions on age - although its not ageism per se but rather restricting clients to those of middle age (>30 or 30-60).
What are people's thoughts on this? I think sex workers always have the right to consent at any time before or after contact with clients.
Demographic variables for advertisers restricting clients based on ethnicity:
This looked at what words people put after "No" in sex work ads over a 15 year period. An emerging theme was the exclusion of Men of Color in advertising. This is particularly pronounced in Ontario and it looks like its almost exclusively female workers who employ this type of restriction.
Looking at the ads there's really a debate going on about this with some advertisers explicitly stating that everyone is welcome. While less prevalent there are also sometimes restrictions on age - although its not ageism per se but rather restricting clients to those of middle age (>30 or 30-60).
What are people's thoughts on this? I think sex workers always have the right to consent at any time before or after contact with clients.
Demographic variables for advertisers restricting clients based on ethnicity: