What does that mean "too intense" ?
According to his thumbnail... I think he has no mercy!
What does that mean "too intense" ?
What does that mean "too intense" ?
I'm on the same page as you. I like to make girls come but I understand, my desire is just my fantasy of being a good lover to a beautiful woman, for her it's just business, and bad for business if you make her come too much. It sucks to be reminded of this, but it's healthy to not get so lost in the fantasy.I think what they all mean is she's not into you, the money you pay isn't worth it for the sexual activity.
That's how I see it and I'm perfectly fine with it because there are so many girls, I just jump to the next. I used to get offended, but I know it is beyond me and there's nothing I can do.
Exactly why the hell do some guys want to put money in the hands of escorts looking down on them? It's like begging a racist restaurant/club to take your money when they don't even desire you there as a customer shit makes 0 sense F them people go where you are welcomed.since august i decided to put SPs who put "no black men" in their ads on my ignore lists.. on twitter i simply block them and move on
As someone who use to be a driver for outcalls I can confirm this is true. I will also tell you that a lot of these prostitutes have black pimps who manage the ads & they (the pimps) are the ones putting (no black gents) in the ads because they know that a lot of their fellow black men are just pretending to book girls in order to "steal" the sex worker and have them work for them instead.I was told by 2 separate providers from 2 separate major agencies that they have been booked by black dudes looking to recruit them. Like… insistently attempt to recruit them.
On one occasion, the john even had buddies waiting in the parking.
Does that justify flat out refusing to be booked by black gents? I don’t know. Not my ass on the line so it’s certainly not my place to make that call! But it‘s certainly food for thought.
That's very interesting because this is the first time I see this potential explanation come up regarding the topic of "no black gents", which is often discussed. So either it's not true, or you just dropped a huge truth bomb.because they know that a lot of their fellow black men are just pretending to book girls in order to "steal" the sex worker and have them work for them instead.
there's this onlyfans "pornstar" from montreal on instagram. Well I follow her on snapchat as well and last week she was in Toronto doing incalls for like 5 days. I went to search her up on leolist and found her ad but on her ad on leolist she said (no black gent). Now there's this telegram group where guys pay for women onlyfans with fraud credit card and they exposed some of her pictures. Let me tell you this she was on her knees with a mouthfull and with as a black guy cock (probably her pimp).That's very interesting because this is the first time I see this potential explanation come up regarding the topic of "no black gents", which is often discussed. So either it's not true, or you just dropped a huge truth bomb.
That ain’t no bomb at all, not the first time I hear this and it was depicted from an investigating reporter in a Mtl newspaper a few years ago.So either it's not true, or you just dropped a huge truth bomb.
I'm not that surprised, but it's really the first time I see it mentioned in discussions around that topic (here on on Twitter). No need to repeat the classical explanations, which may also be valid, here again.That ain’t no bomb at all, not the first time I hear this and it was depicted from an investigating reporter in a Mtl newspaper a few
I ve seen an add recently about a black woman sp looking only for black men.What about black girls refusing black gents… I’ve seen some of these.
I seen it too but there aren’t that much.I ve seen an add recently about a black woman sp looking only for black men.
That's very interesting because this is the first time I see this potential explanation come up regarding the topic of "no black gents", which is often discussed. So either it's not true, or you just dropped a huge truth bomb.
One common restriction often highlighted in advertisements by service providers is the exclusion of black or colored individuals, which is a prevalent issue across many listings. It is disheartening that such discriminatory practices based on ethnicity continue to prevail, especially in a diverse country like Canada. This unethical behavior significantly impacts the accessibility and inclusivity of services in the industry.
Additionally, there is a noticeable preference among service providers for older customers over younger ones, as indicated in many advertisements. This preference for older clientele is another prevalent detail that can be observed in service provider listings.
If i understand you well, you are trying to blame and virtually signing a few SP.One common restriction often highlighted in advertisements by service providers is the exclusion of black or colored individuals, which is a prevalent issue across many listings. It is disheartening that such discriminatory practices based on ethnicity continue to prevail, especially in a diverse country like Canada. This unethical behavior significantly impacts the accessibility and inclusivity of services in the industry.
Additionally, there is a noticeable preference among service providers for older customers over younger ones, as indicated in many advertisements. This preference for older clientele is another prevalent detail that can be observed in service provider listings.
Hey buddy, I want to emphasize that the information I am sharing is genuine, and if you visit Leolist, you can see their specified restriction as I mentioned.If i understand you well, you are trying to blame and virtually signing a few SP.
Correct?
If so what s your purpose in doing so.
when i go to Super C i choose the freshest fruits. If Sp prefer old fruits , who care lol ! It s their choice.
if one prefer spicy food over bland food ; you ll say it s unethical???
I'm surprised no one brought that up yet, probably an excess of politeness/PCness. I read a lengthy blog post written by a black guy about this very subject and this is absolutely the main reason...That's very interesting because this is the first time I see this potential explanation come up regarding the topic of "no black gents", which is often discussed. So either it's not true, or you just dropped a huge truth bomb.
The usual explanation–that Black escorts were afraid to run into a member of their own community–never made much sense to me. It's not as if there were only 52 Blacks in Montreal... The odds are low overall, but this situation could happen to an escort of any ethnicity. This "new" explanation, as uncomfortable as it may be, seems closer to the truth. And there are few things more intellectually rewarding than uncovering the truth when it is hidden by a veneer of political correctness.I'm surprised no one brought that up yet, probably an excess of politeness/PCness. I read a lengthy blog post written by a black guy about this very subject and this is absolutely the main reason...
I'm surprised no one brought that up yet, probably an excess of politeness/PCness. I read a lengthy blog post written by a black guy about this very subject and this is absolutely the main reason...
I believe that ethnicity plays a significant role in this situation. It is true that certain ethnic SP may avoid customers from the same ethnicity background because of the close-knit nature of their community. I don't think they are being dishonest when they use this as a reason.The usual explanation–that Black escorts were afraid to run into a member of their own community–never made much sense to me. It's not as if there were only 52 Blacks in Montreal... The odds are low overall, but this situation could happen to an escort of any ethnicity. This "new" explanation, as uncomfortable as it may be, seems closer to the truth. And there are few things more intellectually rewarding than uncovering the truth when it is hidden by a veneer of political correctness.