I'm on the same page as you. I like to make girls come but I understand, my desire is just my fantasy of being a good lover to a beautiful woman, for her it's just business, and bad for business if you make her come too much. It sucks to be reminded of this, but it's healthy to not get so lost in the fantasy.
The meaning of "No"
- Thread starter pop2021
- Start date
Exactly why the hell do some guys want to put money in the hands of escorts looking down on them? It's like begging a racist restaurant/club to take your money when they don't even desire you there as a customer shit makes 0 sense F them people go where you are welcomed.
As someone who use to be a driver for outcalls I can confirm this is true. I will also tell you that a lot of these prostitutes have black pimps who manage the ads & they (the pimps) are the ones putting (no black gents) in the ads because they know that a lot of their fellow black men are just pretending to book girls in order to "steal" the sex worker and have them work for them instead.
That's very interesting because this is the first time I see this potential explanation come up regarding the topic of "no black gents", which is often discussed. So either it's not true, or you just dropped a huge truth bomb.
there's this onlyfans "pornstar" from montreal on instagram. Well I follow her on snapchat as well and last week she was in Toronto doing incalls for like 5 days. I went to search her up on leolist and found her ad but on her ad on leolist she said (no black gent). Now there's this telegram group where guys pay for women onlyfans with fraud credit card and they exposed some of her pictures. Let me tell you this she was on her knees with a mouthfull and with as a black guy cock (probably her pimp).
Also I would like to add that the same applies with famous pornstars I think years ago I saw an interview about Alexis Texas (yes that one PAWG) on ThisIs50 i think where it was disclosed that many female performers like Rachel Starr, Audrey Bitoni, etc do not shoot with black male performes but have sex with black men in their personnal life + have black boyfriends. Their boyfriends (black guy) is the one telling them not to do scenes with other black men (maybe an insecurity issue).
That ain’t no bomb at all, not the first time I hear this and it was depicted from an investigating reporter in a Mtl newspaper a few years ago.
I'm not that surprised, but it's really the first time I see it mentioned in discussions around that topic (here on on Twitter). No need to repeat the classical explanations, which may also be valid, here again.
I seen it too but there aren’t that much.
Cool because black gents are usually more restricted.
There are some ads with girls who are preferring BBC and that’s all right.
It’s bit like those who do not want to see gents over 50.
In both cases, it’s ok for me and I go on.
Great chances there wouldn’t be any chemistry anyway.
But if you fall into girls preferences then it’s a win-win situation
A no is a no go
I have seen that in other articles plus have heard that from one escort who it happened to.
One common restriction often highlighted in advertisements by service providers is the exclusion of black or colored individuals, which is a prevalent issue across many listings. It is disheartening that such discriminatory practices based on ethnicity continue to prevail, especially in a diverse country like Canada. This unethical behavior significantly impacts the accessibility and inclusivity of services in the industry.
Additionally, there is a noticeable preference among service providers for older customers over younger ones, as indicated in many advertisements. This preference for older clientele is another prevalent detail that can be observed in service provider listings.
Additionally, there is a noticeable preference among service providers for older customers over younger ones, as indicated in many advertisements. This preference for older clientele is another prevalent detail that can be observed in service provider listings.
If i understand you well, you are trying to blame and virtually signing a few SP.
Correct?
If so what s your purpose in doing so.
when i go to Super C i choose the freshest fruits. If Sp prefer old fruits , who care lol ! It s their choice.
if one prefer spicy food over bland food ; you ll say it s unethical???
Hey buddy, I want to emphasize that the information I am sharing is genuine, and if you visit Leolist, you can see their specified restriction as I mentioned.
My participation in this thread is no different from any other individual on this forum . I do not intend to stir up any trouble with my comments. I am simply relaying what I have observed on the listings of service providers.
Everyone as the freedom to choose their customers.The same way I like to choose fresh fruits at the grocery store. Please don’t take my post too seriously, as I am only expressing facts or offering my personal perspective based on my own experience .
I believe in being straightforward and transparent, speaking my mind without hesitation.
A popular escort once rejected me for being a black man.
Except, I'm absolutely lily white.
She walked into my hotel in Montreal and apparently introduced herself to a black man waiting in the lobby where we were to meet (she arrived early, and 1 or 2 minutes before I got down to the lobby). She introduced herself to the one gentleman there and said something like "Hi, I'm so-and-so." Presumably he thought she was trying to pick him up and acted accordingly. She thought he was me, and she was trying to communicate that she didn't see black men. I can only imagine how confusing this was to the guy. Anyway, the situation escalated, confusion ensued, and she left in an upset huff. And I arrive a moment later to an empty elevator lobby.
All I knew at the time was that I was stood up. I heard what happened from the booker later that night.
Except, I'm absolutely lily white.
She walked into my hotel in Montreal and apparently introduced herself to a black man waiting in the lobby where we were to meet (she arrived early, and 1 or 2 minutes before I got down to the lobby). She introduced herself to the one gentleman there and said something like "Hi, I'm so-and-so." Presumably he thought she was trying to pick him up and acted accordingly. She thought he was me, and she was trying to communicate that she didn't see black men. I can only imagine how confusing this was to the guy. Anyway, the situation escalated, confusion ensued, and she left in an upset huff. And I arrive a moment later to an empty elevator lobby.
All I knew at the time was that I was stood up. I heard what happened from the booker later that night.
I'm surprised no one brought that up yet, probably an excess of politeness/PCness. I read a lengthy blog post written by a black guy about this very subject and this is absolutely the main reason...
The usual explanation–that Black escorts were afraid to run into a member of their own community–never made much sense to me. It's not as if there were only 52 Blacks in Montreal... The odds are low overall, but this situation could happen to an escort of any ethnicity. This "new" explanation, as uncomfortable as it may be, seems closer to the truth. And there are few things more intellectually rewarding than uncovering the truth when it is hidden by a veneer of political correctness.
I believe that ethnicity plays a significant role in this situation. It is true that certain ethnic SP may avoid customers from the same ethnicity background because of the close-knit nature of their community. I don't think they are being dishonest when they use this as a reason.
It's possible. It's also possible that there is more than one rationale behind the statement "No Black Gents". As with any underground or clandestine activity, the gathering of scientific information on anything that surrounds it is difficult, giving rise to speculation.
Similar threads
