Don't credit Gainey for the Habs' success
by Jack Todd, The Gazette
MONTREAL – Despite the revisionist historians, the man who deserves the accolades is Halak, not Bob Gainey. Had Gainey been in charge after Game 4 of the Washington series, when the critical decision was made to go back to Halak rather than sticking with Price, you know the nod would have gone the other way.
Mercifully, Halak got the call for Game 5 against Washington, and the rest is history.
A playoff run that has galvanized an entire city. A slightly built Slovakian goaltender emerging as the early favourite for the Conn Smythe trophy as the playoff MVP. A story that we'll be talking about for at least the next 20 years, or until the Canadiens win their next Stanley Cup.
Those who want to credit Gainey for putting this team together ignore two things. First of all, this team barely made the playoffs. Second, had Gainey still been in place, the Canadiens would have been playing golf since mid-April, if not before.
Had Gainey remained, it is entirely possible that Halak would be elsewhere - possibly even backstopping these same Flyers, who have gotten outstanding playoff goaltending from Brian Boucher and Michael Leighton.
This assumes also that head coach Jacques Martin would still have his job, and that he would not have been replaced with 10 games left in the season by Gainey, who would have played Price in every game down the stretch while the Habs missed the playoffs.
At the very least, Gainey would have seen no reason to bench a "thoroughbred" who had just taken two unsportsmanlike conduct penalties in the waning minutes of Game 4. Price would have been back between the pipes in Washington and the Canadiens would have had no chance.
Ironically, last summer's radical makeover (for which Gainey is now being given belated credit) had its origins in the second round in 2008, when the Canadiens were run over by these same Flyers. The Canadiens, everyone seemed to agree, where too small and too skilled. They needed big, rugged forwards to match up with the Flyers.
So Gainey dumped Steve Bégin and Tom Kostopoulos (among many others) replaced his small, skilled forwards with more small, skilled forwards - and built a skilled team capable of beating the Washington Capitals and Pittsburgh Penguins but, perhaps, not these big, rugged Flyers.
Yes, Gainey did succeed in locating some players who would show up come playoff time. Michael Cammalleri, Brian Gionta, Hal Gill, Jaroslav Spacek, Travis Moen and Scott Gomez.
But no one, least of all Gainey, knew this was going to happen. It is one of the enduring fascinations of sport, the way teams mysteriously come together - or, correspondingly, fall apart. In a media world perpetually ga-ga over the stars (Ovechkin, Crosby, the wretchedly selfish LeBron James) far too little attention is paid to the concept of team, but teams, not individuals, win championships.
It's all well and good for Gomez to claim that the Canadiens were together from the beginning, but they sure fooled the world for the entire regular season. They were the worst of the 16 teams to qualify for the playoffs, with a miserable 88 points. In the Western Conference, they would have finished in a tie for 12th with Dallas, a point behind Anaheim, Overall, they finished 19th in the NHL.
Sure they had injuries. Everyone has injuries. What are you going to do, cry to the Boston Bruins about the Canadiens injuries? But when Halak played well enough to give his teammates a chance, they stepped up. They blocked shots by the bucketful. They came up with timely scoring, mostly from Cammalleri and Gionta.
They played with courage and nerve. They played the way guys play when they have a hot goalie at their backs.
Through the first 15 games of this playoff season, the Canadiens have been outshot, out-hit, out-chanced and beaten blue in the faceoff circle. They are where they are today because Halak was given a chance.
In the Pittsburgh series, we watched Halak, the 271st choice in the 2004 draft, beat the pants off No. 1 pick Marc-André Fleury. Even if he doesn't win the Conn Smythe, Halak is the story of the 2010 playoffs.
With Gainey still in charge, Halak would never have had a chance. It's not that Gainey was a terrible GM. He wasn't. He inherited a mid-pack team, he left a mid-pack team.
Gainey made some good moves - among his best, the decision to deal Craig Rivet for Josh Gorges. Or drafting P.K. Subban. He also made some terrible moves, but the worst damage was not with trades or draft choices, but with the way he handled some of his young players, Price in particular.
This team might recover from last night's mugging. They might overcome officiating which has been consistently bad since the first round. They might go on to win this series and meet the Chicago Blackhawks in an Original Six final.
If they do, the credit goes to them, not to someone who quit in mid-season. It goes to Cammalleri and Gionta, to Gill and Spacek and Gorges, to the remarkable rookie Subban.
Above all, it goes to Halak. Because with Gainey gone, he got his chance. He made the most of it.
Boring Bob Gainey, one of the most enthusiastic men in Montreal