Perhaps like others out here, I enjoy looking at the ads--bp, the independents listings, and especially the Montreal Indy Companions. It's both research and dreaming. Now I don't want to say I've made a study of this, but it seems to me that, as a general rule, the more expensive the SP, the less likely she is to smile in her pictures. Obviously there are exceptions, but while it's easy to find attractive SPs in the $200-$300 range smiling (I love the pictures of Amber Rose, Dorothy Fairman, and Dax Desire, for example), it's quite rare to see big smiles over $400/hour, and almost unheard of at $500.
So, if this observation is true, why do the "elite" companions decide not to smile in their ads and pictures? There are plenty of stunningly sexy pictures ... and they often look elegant, sophisticated, worldly ... and yet they intentionally exude "class" and not "fun." Is that what the 1% want in an escort? Is that our culture's idea of sexy? Does it convey something deeper or more serious for the extra money? (Personally, I've paid up to $600/hr, though not in Montreal, and I always want fun--and smart and cool--but especially fun.)
So: why so few smiles?
So, if this observation is true, why do the "elite" companions decide not to smile in their ads and pictures? There are plenty of stunningly sexy pictures ... and they often look elegant, sophisticated, worldly ... and yet they intentionally exude "class" and not "fun." Is that what the 1% want in an escort? Is that our culture's idea of sexy? Does it convey something deeper or more serious for the extra money? (Personally, I've paid up to $600/hr, though not in Montreal, and I always want fun--and smart and cool--but especially fun.)
So: why so few smiles?