Montreal Escorts

The Slow Move to a Police State

Sol Tee Nutz

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2012
7,675
1,523
113
Look behind you.
^^^^^^^ I object to anything the UN does.

Just an opinion piece I found.

The UN’s Agenda 2030 was foundering until the COVID-19 crisis hit. Few countries were meeting their Sustainable Development Goals with even leftist run Canada lagging in their efforts. What they truly needed was a crisis — something to galvanize the world into the realization that governments need more control over their populations in order to make life better for everyone.

How fortuitous for the United Nations that the coronavirus hit when it did, offering globalists this opportunity for a “reset.” It’s almost as if it was planned this way.
 

Valcazar

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
860
256
83
^^^^^^^ I object to anything the UN does.

So you are against the following goals just because the UN says it is for them?


Goal 1End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Goal 2End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 3Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 4Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Goal 5Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Goal 6Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Goal 7Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Goal 8Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Goal 9Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Goal 10Reduce inequality within and among countries
Goal 11Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Goal 12Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Goal 13Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Goal 14Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Goal 15Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Goal 16Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Goal 17Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
 

Sol Tee Nutz

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2012
7,675
1,523
113
Look behind you.
^^^^ To ensure that you must take from those who worked hard for it.


It is amazing how many of the intelligentsia call it "greed" to want to keep what you have earned, but not greed to want to take away what somebody else has earned, and let politicians use it to buy votes.-Thomas Sowell

Goal 17 would probably mean the UN runs the world and then you have many Trudeaus in power, not a good thing.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,112
4,061
113
Valcazar,

So in other words you agree with communism/socialism? Take away from others that work hard to give it to others who have little. In other words forced equality? Penalize success and reward failure. Look at Cuba and Venezuela. It does not work! The UN does not mean what they say just as Fidel Trudope does not mean what they say. The goal seems to be a global totalitarian government. All this welfare in the name to end hunger so they say is a way to create dependency on the government so they will be in a place to control the means of production and distribution. And presto you got communism. But it never works for the people. It keeps them in poverty and in control while politicians live in a life of luxury. In Venezuela the most common stuff we take for granted like toilet paper was in scarcity there. Are you willing to give up your freedom for this so called Utopia the UN promises?

I am strongly against Globalism. Each country should decide for themselves what is best for them and they should not be obligated to send money to foreign countries neither should they be obligated to open the floodgates to mass immigration.
 

Valcazar

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
860
256
83
Valcazar,

So in other words you agree with communism/socialism?

Absolutely, I'm practically an anarcho-syndicalist for all you know.

Are you willing to give up your freedom for this so called Utopia the UN promises?

I am saying that this assumption that the SDG is actually a communist plot is bizarre.

I am strongly against Globalism. Each country should decide for themselves what is best for them and they should not be obligated to send money to foreign countries neither should they be obligated to open the floodgates to mass immigration.

I'm sorry, does the UN have some sort of executive power where it forces countries to do what it says?
When did that start?
What are the punishments?
How does a country's voluntary alignment with these goals become something they didn't decide for themselves?
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
20,477
3,344
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I am strongly against Globalism. Each country should decide for themselves what is best for them and they should not be obligated to send money to foreign countries neither should they be obligated to open the floodgates to mass immigration.

Are you not descended from immigrants to Canada yourself? Are you not snapping back at the hand that has fed you?
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,112
4,061
113
^^^^^
That is a pointless argument. It is not just because we all came from some other country that politicians are not responsible to ensure that its citzens has a good quality of life. Presently Fidel Trudope is inviting mass amounts of immigrants from third world countries. Rents are rising at an exponential rate, house prices also increasing, traffic is increasing, wages of professional jobs are dropping, increased pollution, etc.. Most of the things that come with it are bad. Over population is mankinds biggest enemy. Nothing presents more of a threat then does over population. Furthermore Canada or any other country is not a welfare state. Did you know that Fidel Trudope changed the rules for retired parents of recent immigrants? Under Harper they can get super visa but Trudope gave them citizenship. What that means is that they will be entitled to full pension, voting rights, and universal healthcare. The biggest waste of money is paying pension to retired people who NEVER paid a dime of taxes. That is not fair to the citizens who paid 40+ years of income taxes. What about the veterans? Those on fixed income? Fidel Trudope is using this to buy votes and is so desperate to have a seat on the UN security council. He wasted millions of taxpayers money on foreign aid in the hopes to have a seat on the UN. Let me clue you in it is easy to spend others peoples money. If Trudope really wants to help he can donate his salary and open up his mansion to refugees. Btw while the borders were closed and Americans were not allowed to visit, Trudope was letting in refugees and immigrants. Go figure. So in short a politician serves the people and has a responsibility to the people and that includes RESPONSIBLE immigration. One thing to mention were in covid, many businesses are closed down and many jobs are lost. Do we really need more immigrants? Is that not like putting fuel on fire. Why more immigrants? Because of the UN??
 
  • Like
Reactions: hungry101

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,112
4,061
113
I'm sorry, does the UN have some sort of executive power where it forces countries to do what it says?
When did that start?
What are the punishments?
How does a country's voluntary alignment with these goals become something they didn't decide for themselves?

No one is forcing them but to to gain the votes to have a seat on the UN council then the politicians got to follow what the UN says. Fidel Trudope so desperately wants that seat. He let in so many immigrants, gave out so much welfare, and gave away so much money to foreign countries. All to have that seat and he still was rejected. How pathetic. See Trump did the right thing to reject the UN and the Paris agreement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sol Tee Nutz

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,838
546
113
This has been popping up too much lately.

This should scare the hell out of anyone that owns stock, invests in a 401K or IRA, ir any normal person...
Trudope is only a little more competent than AOC. Are we going to let this idiot destroy the economy of North America in the name of humanity? This is insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sol Tee Nutz

Sol Tee Nutz

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2012
7,675
1,523
113
Look behind you.
Are you not descended from immigrants to Canada yourself? Are you not snapping back at the hand that has fed you?

When my dad immigrated into Canada in 1959 there was no welfare to live off of, no social assistance, get a job and become Canadian or go back. Dad came 2 years before us, got a job and saved money to bring us over ( Yes I am a boat person ) and become Canadian citizens. Now they walk across the border with I-phones and a suitcase and the RCMP bring them to a fucking hotel to chill while they get the government checks, or refugees, young males with cell phones, not the women and children you expect, again, waiting for their free money. There is a big difference between immigrants now and 60 yrs ago.
 

The Nature Boy

Well-Known Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,342
1,510
113

Sol Tee Nutz

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2012
7,675
1,523
113
Look behind you.
Most definitely


What is your point

Less than two weeks ago, the United States conducted a drone strike over central Yemen, killing one al-Qaeda operative. The strike was the last under Obama (that we know of). The 542 drone strikes that Obama authorized killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians. As he reportedly told senior aides in 2011: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: hungry101

Valcazar

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
860
256
83
What is your point

Less than two weeks ago, the United States conducted a drone strike over central Yemen, killing one al-Qaeda operative. The strike was the last under Obama (that we know of). The 542 drone strikes that Obama authorized killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians. As he reportedly told senior aides in 2011: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”

Obama's embrace of the drone was a real tragedy and something he should be criticized for.
Of course, Trump, seeing that Obama was good at killing people, had to order even more drone strikes and remove any reporting about killing civilians. Since he campaigned on taking out people's families, we have to assume the murder rate of non-combatants went up.
 

hungry101

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
5,838
546
113


Gavin Newsom was photographed at the finest restaurant - indoors - in Napa Valley, accepting a 400$/plate meal and drinking ~500$ bottles of wine with 5 other couples, violating all social
distancing norms and regulations. The dinner was attended by lobbyists and the CEO of the Medical lobby in CA? Newsom got off with an apology but the article gives mention to CA residents like the paddle boarder who was paddling off the coast not within 500 yards of another human being but was arrested and faces a $4000 fine and imprisonment! Governor Tom Wolf of PA was caught out to eat with his family just the other day. Rules for thee and not for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sol Tee Nutz
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts