Merlot, as I stated earlier I probably never saw the post, it happened when I was at a camp in northern Alberta and internet is not always available, it really did bother me so get off the fucking topic just because I did not post.
Hello NUTZ!
The above is called...covering your backside.
You're being untruthful. You posted 6 times in the duration of the Newtown shootings thread when it was open between 12-14 to 12-17, 2012, and it would have been impossible not to see the Newtown thread since 61 posts were made to bump it to the top at the same time you posted three times in the
"Montreal Requiring All Dogs To Be Bilingual". Yup, that one was a funny thread. Obviously you found it far more interesting than the slaughter of 20 tiny children. Such were your priorities at the time. That's fine with me, but why use the murdered boy as a rationale in this case when you chose to ignore the murders of so many other children. :noidea: :nono:
Posting history is a terrible thing to forget.
... give me 1 good reason why taxes should pay to keep this person alive.
First you make some gravely erroneous presumptions about my views. Just because I don't agree with your idea of long term torture before and after getting the information you assume I and probably others don't want the death penalty. Wrong!!! The fact that the prisoner did it is incontestable. Fry his ass or hang him...whatever the method is. But do it in a way that provides
faith to all of us that the process of law is working, not in a way that promotes vigilante barbarism. My problem with the death penalty is when it involves cases where it's a matter of preponderance of the evidence without absolute proof or reasonably conclusive proof...and attitudes like that in Texas where they say...we don't make mistakes, which is feel good public relations horse crap. The Innocence Project has proven mistake are made.
Sure, we can't constantly worry so much about mistakes in the process of conviction leading to the death penalty all of the time. But some cases badly need reviewing.
Secondly, information is critical to anything. The best reason for keeping him alive is all he can tell us. I was listening to some supposed experts assessment on the skills it takes to make sure one has a working bomb. The prisoner says he learned how on the internet. The expert said it takes practical testing to make sure the bombs will work, plus these guys had a number of bombs and other detonating devices they used against pursuing police that worked pretty well. That sounds like there had to be help on following through with this bombing. Keeping him alive could uncover a lot more and maybe save other 8-year-old boys and their families.
Thirdly, your own proposal was to torture him, heal him, torture him again...and so on. Who was going to pay for all of that...the Society of Benevolent Sadists. :lol:
C'mon bud,
Merlot