Instead of looking for the source prove them wrong. When I read articles I look if there is others disputing it, not to see who put it out there so I give approval.
Towards the presidential run of 2024
- Thread starter sene5hos
- Start date
Instead of looking for the source prove them wrong. When I read articles I look if there is others disputing it, not to see who put it out there so I give approval.
Read my reply to Gaby, same applies. Do a bit of research and prove it wrong.
Explains a lot... so what your saying is that you'll read fictional information, take is as fact without ever questionning any of its validity... just wow. This is why I can never take extreme right or left views seriously.
You post as if the source is reuters. Didn't have to dig to far to find that that article was a trtworld shitpost using the reuters photo.... no wonder you dont want to do any actual research... this is the dead end you'll reach everytime.
Stay in school kids and stop eating crayons.... this is the perfect example of how disinformation campaigns work... FML
Last edited:
It's a real milestone that Kacklin' Kamala is the first ex-sugar baby (prostitute?) to run for president.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Kamala Harris had an affair with Mayor Willie Brown
Vice Presidential nominee Kamala Harris dated San Francisco's first black mayor Wilile Brown in the 1990s, while he was still married but separated from his wife.
Here's another option: I reject your plagiarized opinion/propaganda outright.
Here's Pete talking about the other side and why they're solution bankrupt:
How many affairs has trump had?It's a real milestone that Kacklin' Kamala is the first ex-sugar baby (prostitute?) to run for president.
Kamala Harris had an affair with Mayor Willie Brown
Vice Presidential nominee Kamala Harris dated San Francisco's first black mayor Wilile Brown in the 1990s, while he was still married but separated from his wife.
And implying that a sugar-baby is a prostitute is showing disrespect to the women.
How do you call the maried men that are unfaithful to their wives with sugar-babies ?
And on an ESCORTS review board web site, calling sugar-baby a prostitute is a a little strange.
What would you call them.
Taking money for sex usually equates to being a prostitute even if SB like to make believe that they are better than them and somehow different.
I very much prefer a SW at least they are straight up and honest about doing it for money.
Unfortunately the choice hasn’t changed much still a poor choice no matter who wins.
They call men that are unfaithful to their wives like Trump and many on this board cheaters.
Many potential politicians here lol.
I have more respect for cheaters than for many politicians !
I would call many : whores ! Like J. D. Vance who compared Trump to Hadolf Hitler two years ago and now licks him you know where !
Politicians are all the same it doesn’t matter what party they represent at the time.
They will not bat an eye to switch allegiance if the price is right.
One of these days you will realize that.
Trump, Biden, Kamala, Vance they are all in it for power, ego, and money, they do not give a shit about the people that voted for them.
Again, prove it wrong. Do you honestly think medias like Democrat Now or whatever you follow would even post this info? If I was to dispute someone I would post that I found not question what media the other person used. Can not call disinformation when you have nothing to back it with.
Even if everything you posted from your anonymous, and apparently biased source, were true - and it's so unlikely that it is - it pales in comparison to trump's history in business of fraud.
From the BBC, hope it meets with your approval.
But evidence that there is something wrong at the top is hard to dismiss.
Ms Harris' presidential campaign began with a bang. Her kick-off rally in January 2019 drew tens of thousands of supporters to Oakland, California. She rocketed to near the top of polls after performing strongly in the first primary debate later that June.
Then she came crashing back down to earth, beset by staff upheaval, underwhelming media interviews and subsequent debates, and no clear message or constituency in the party.
In other words, all the problems Ms Harris has faced during her first year as vice-president also surfaced during her presidential campaign.
Kamala Harris visits US border amid migrant crisis
Harris tells Guatemala migrants: 'Do not come to US'
She's had a surprising amount of staff turnover in her first year in office, with her communications chief and press spokesperson both departing.
A particularly stinging blow came in the Washington Post, where an anonymous former staffer said she was unwilling to do the work necessary for the job and took out her frustration on her aides.
"With Kamala you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence," the former staffer said. "So you're constantly sort of propping up a bully, and it's not really clear why."
Ms Harris' problems have regularly been compounded by gaffes during one-on-one interviews and public appearances. There's talk of friction between her office and the rest of the White House. She has been unable to settle on a policy issue that she can make a positive political calling card.
But evidence that there is something wrong at the top is hard to dismiss.
Ms Harris' presidential campaign began with a bang. Her kick-off rally in January 2019 drew tens of thousands of supporters to Oakland, California. She rocketed to near the top of polls after performing strongly in the first primary debate later that June.
Then she came crashing back down to earth, beset by staff upheaval, underwhelming media interviews and subsequent debates, and no clear message or constituency in the party.
In other words, all the problems Ms Harris has faced during her first year as vice-president also surfaced during her presidential campaign.
Kamala Harris visits US border amid migrant crisis
Harris tells Guatemala migrants: 'Do not come to US'
She's had a surprising amount of staff turnover in her first year in office, with her communications chief and press spokesperson both departing.
A particularly stinging blow came in the Washington Post, where an anonymous former staffer said she was unwilling to do the work necessary for the job and took out her frustration on her aides.
"With Kamala you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence," the former staffer said. "So you're constantly sort of propping up a bully, and it's not really clear why."
Ms Harris' problems have regularly been compounded by gaffes during one-on-one interviews and public appearances. There's talk of friction between her office and the rest of the White House. She has been unable to settle on a policy issue that she can make a positive political calling card.
Yet she was selected by Biden to be his VP, was elected by 81 million Americans, has served for over 3 years as VP, and has been endorsed by Biden to run for president. Even if all the criticisms are true - and they are only the opinions of her detractors - they pale in comparison to the fraudulent business record, twice impeached presidential record, four times indicated and once convicted criminal record,
and the inane rhetoric/incoherent rants of trump as he runs for president to stay out of courtrooms and jail.
Last edited:
Let's face it 90% of news networks are Democratic funded networks so this "momentum" is really just bullshit networks doing what they're told. 2 weeks ago they were praising Joe and saying he's sharp and fit. Next thing you know, funders wanted him removed, which they did. We all knew they were going to go all in with whomever was chosen. If they had time and had their choice kamala wouldn't be it but they'll do anything to show she's perfect and the right choice. She won't win, most Americans can see right through the bullshit networks (Fox included).
Last edited:
Similar threads
