This is the next President? Putin, Xi and others will never take her and the US seriously. They'll eat her up.
Trump received 46% of the total vote in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. Clinton and Biden received 48% and 51%, respectively. Voters are more likely to vote for a Democrat and have in 7 of the 8 last presidential elections.Yet Trump is still popular, shows how well liked the Dems are.
Gaffe machine? Have you listened to trump? He's outright incoherent. Poor debater? Why is trump afraid of debating her? And your entire Gabbard point is ridiculous. She threw a few punches just like she did for years against Obama. Where is she now? On Fox and at CPAC. Electoral record? She's won more elections than trump and was part of the ticket that defeated him in 2020. Staff morale? You are grasping at straws to come up with negatives. Maybe you have some other reasons for disliking her so much.Harris was not very popular in the past with a 28% approval rating but since the Dems had to kick out Biden they had to pick Harris, not for want but for need.
From the Washington Examiner
Biden didn’t pick Harris for an electoral boost, nor did he pick her for her political talent. Harris’s time in the national spotlight going back to 2019 has included embarrassing blunders such as suggesting rural people are incapable of using photocopiers and being unprepared for obvious questions about her few responsibilities as vice president. Harris is famous for her rambling word salad answers that make her sound like a broken artificial intelligence chatbot.
To top it all off, Harris is also a bad debater, despite the liberal media wish-casting that it would be her strength as a former prosecutor. Her 2020 presidential campaign was ended on the debate stage by Tulsi Gabbard, and she was batted away in future debates by both Democrats and then-Vice President Mike Pence.
To recap, Harris is a gaffe machine, is a poor debater, and has an unimpressive electoral history. She also has a terrible record with her own staff, including “low morale, porous lines of communication, and diminished trust among aides.” Axios even reported that she had to hold a “mock dinner” before a dinner with journalists because Harris is so inauthentic that she cannot even speak to dinner guests without rehearsing it.
So sure, you can go ahead and argue that Harris was selected based on merits, as Weigel and Dovere have. Just make sure you get back to the rest of us about what those merits could possibly be.
Thunder Lipps was quoting a Washington Examiner article which was completely on target and all of this has been well known and well publicized for a long time. He is not saying it, the Washington press has for some time because they know it is all true.Gaffe machine? Have you listened to trump? He's outright incoherent. Poor debater? Why is trump afraid of debating her? And your entire Gabbard point is ridiculous. She threw a few punches just like she did for years against Obama. Where is she now? On Fox and at CPAC. Electoral record? She's won more elections than trump and was part of the ticket that defeated him in 2020. Staff morale? You are grasping at straws to come up with negatives. Maybe you have some other reasons for disliking her so much.
The Washington Examiner is a far-right publication. It is not a credible, unbiased source.Thunder Lipps was quoting a Washington Examiner article which was completely on target and all of this has been well known and well publicized for a long time. He is not saying it, the Washington press has for some time because they know it is all true.
The 4 years that resulted in 2 impeachments, a bungled COVID-19 response, an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election and illegally stay in power. That 4 years?Just compare Trump's 4 years to Biden/Harris' 4 years. The answer is right there.
The 4 years that resulted in 2 impeachments, a bungled COVID-19 response, an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election and illegally stay in power. That 4 years?
The Washington Examiner is a far-right publication. It is not a credible, unbiased source.
. Staff morale?
So fraud is a "victimless crime" when trump does it. The jury and the judge didn't think so.Please name some of your credible sources? The ones the Dems prefer would never post that. Have you ever seen a post that said " Trump lied about his property value for a loan but to note the loan was paid off in full and on time, it was a victimless crime.
If that was in the headlines ( as that is as far as most read ) I think there would be a different outlook towards that crime.
As for far right.. Guess anything the Dems do not agree with is Far right.View attachment 76361
View attachment 76362
That would make the Washington Post far left?
So fraud is a "victimless crime" when trump does it. The jury and the judge didn't think so.
Because of the fraud trump was able to borrow more money at a lower rate and get more favorable premiums from insurers. So do you really think that this fraud is insignificant? The jury consisted of ordinary citizens selected by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The jury heard the evidence, applied the law, and found trump and his sons guilty. If you don't want to be held accountable in NY, don't commit a crime there.Who got hurt in this event when all the monies was paid back on time? My comment was towards the medias failing to make note of the fact no money was stolen and all debts paid back. Plus a jury and judge from NY, did not expect Trump to win that one even before it began, neither did the jury or judge.
So if I take a shot at you and miss, is it a victimless crime and therefore not to be penalized?Please name some of your credible sources? The ones the Dems prefer would never post that. Have you ever seen a post that said " Trump lied about his property value for a loan but to note the loan was paid off in full and on time, it was a victimless crime.
So if I take a shot at you and miss, is it a victimless crime and therefore not to be penalized?
If I change a price tag on an article in your store and pay less than you asked, but you don't lose money, is it a victimless crime? Trump paid less interest than the bank would have asked if he had provided honest information.