That's exactly right. Biden didn't cause the post covid worldwide inflation. Trump and MAGA Republicans are always looking for someone to blame to gain a political edge. They have no solutions just grievances, and their hapless supporters stupidly accept the promise that trump will fix everything.When Trump speak, it's very easy to interpret his words, it's always the contrary of what he said !
Republican put the blame on Biden for food high prices.
Have you heard how thwy will bring the prices down ?
It's the same thing for every of their blames and their gullibles supporters applaude !
That's exactly right. Biden didn't cause the post covid worldwide inflation. Trump and MAGA Republicans are always looking for someone to blame to gain a political edge. They have no solutions just grievances, and their hapless supporters stupidly accept the promise that trump will fix everything.
So true. Trump was not, and will not be, a president for all of America - just for MAGA America, the rich, big corporations, his cronies, and for himself.Interesting infos on Youtube about Trump administration response on natural disasters.
The infos come from officials working at the time.
Simply, he tried to withhold aid from victims who didn't vote for him.
After the huge forest fires in California, he didn't want to help because California was a Democrat state. In 2019, after a huricane caused disaster in Florida, Ron de Santis asked for more help.
Trump told : " they love me in the Panhandle. I must have 90 percent of the vote out there. Huge crowds. What do they need ? On March 9, 2019, trump signed an order directing FEMA to pay 100 percent of most disaster costs in Florida.
Not true. When I read your post I knew if true it would have been a blatant violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. A Judge made the decision to do so.Jack Smith published a 165 pages court document illustrating in details the actions of a recent ex-President to steal the 2020 election !
And when an individual has been indicted and criminally charged, it doesn't matter that the defendant is running for office or not. No one is above the law, or should get special treatment, including this defendant.Not true. When I read your post I knew if true it would have been a blatant violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. A Judge made the decision to do so.
Whether Judge Chuktan violated the 60 Day Quiet Rule is unknown, as I haven't studied the Canon of Judicial Ethics. I suspect Trump's counsel may file a grievance. I would. The rule is the rule doesn't matter who is running for President.
Trump claims new Jack Smith filing is election interference. Here's how it became public.
Former President Donald Trump accused special counsel Jack Smith of election interference over a new filing in his federal case. Here's what really happened.www.yahoo.com
I think what Fradi meant is that your credibility took a hit since your lunacies has been exposed.Let's try this again, shall we. I am posting about Vance and Walz and their VP debate. You are replying about Biden, CNN, and me. I contend that Vance is a trump boot licking, ass kissing, yes man and Walz is not. Care to reply to my contention?
I think what Fradi meant is that your credibility took a hit since your lunacies has been exposed.
A criminally charged defendant gets equal treatment of the law in the courtroom. So you are comparing apples and oranges. Upholding the law on election interference which has been propounded by the DOJ means whomever is running, and whether you like their positions or not. That is NOT special treatment. That is called applying laws and rules to everyone- criminally charged defendants and those running for office, who are entitled to be free of election interferences that the law does not allow.And when an individual has been indicted and criminally charged, it doesn't matter that the defendant is running for office or not. No one is above the law, or should get special treatment, including this defendant.