So voters will decide....and we will see.....
Towards the presidential run of 2024
- Thread starter sene5hos
- Start date
- Status
They will decide Harris isn't cut out to be President and it will be back to the drawing board for the Democrats in 2028. They will be taught the lesson that they need to put forward better candidates for President. I would have voted for Newsome, or Buttigieg. Maybe even Whitmer. Not Harris.
For now,......she is perfect,.....3 rallies.....energy/enthusiasm all over the place....still long way to go....and for sure we have and will have a big fight... she is a good warrior....lol.
Once again, you're seeing/hearing what the government funded news media want you to see/hear. Don't fall for this. They have no choice but to portray her as the best candidate ever.
Don't worry....am able to make up my own mind....same for the voters....
Did you forget that Fox isn't a news chanel but an entertainment chanel ?
That comes directly from them.
Prabably to escape lawsuits !
Maybe but CNN is the worst bullshit I've ever seen. CNN makes me laugh so maybe they're entertainment too? Ever wonder why CNN never shows both sides? Think about it...
CNN shows "both sides" all the time. The other day they had Tom Cotton as a guest. He's about as MAGA as you can get. I didn't listen long because I threw up in my mouth so I changed the channel.
I don't really believe CNN or Fox News are objective at all. If you guys want to get reasonably non-spin news or straight news on American politics, watch the BBC or read the BBC website. They are British and amused, disinterested bystanders who don't give a shit but understand the entertainment value to the audience. They shoot far straighter than any American news outlet.
I think I once wrote that if you watch FOX NEWS and CNN you're sure they cover news on different planets !
FOX was for a time on my channels package and was removed by the provider.
Let me tell you that I didn't pay to have it back.
It Remembered me of the Jerry
Sorry, I had a problem !
It remembered me of the Jerry Springer morning show too much !
As a public service I am posting a link to the USA/Canada page on the BBC site, which is where I suggest you guys get your news:
www.bbc.com
US & Canada | Latest News & Updates | BBC News
Get all the latest news, live updates and content about the US & Canada from across the BBC.
www.bbc.com
Polls have been wrong for years, because they rely on land lines. This excludes a lot of the voters aged less than 40 years old.
Harris was not very popular in the past with a 28% approval rating but since the Dems had to kick out Biden they had to pick Harris, not for want but for need.
From the Washington Examiner
Biden didn’t pick Harris for an electoral boost, nor did he pick her for her political talent. Harris’s time in the national spotlight going back to 2019 has included embarrassing blunders such as suggesting rural people are incapable of using photocopiers and being unprepared for obvious questions about her few responsibilities as vice president. Harris is famous for her rambling word salad answers that make her sound like a broken artificial intelligence chatbot.
To top it all off, Harris is also a bad debater, despite the liberal media wish-casting that it would be her strength as a former prosecutor. Her 2020 presidential campaign was ended on the debate stage by Tulsi Gabbard, and she was batted away in future debates by both Democrats and then-Vice President Mike Pence.
To recap, Harris is a gaffe machine, is a poor debater, and has an unimpressive electoral history. She also has a terrible record with her own staff, including “low morale, porous lines of communication, and diminished trust among aides.” Axios even reported that she had to hold a “mock dinner” before a dinner with journalists because Harris is so inauthentic that she cannot even speak to dinner guests without rehearsing it.
So sure, you can go ahead and argue that Harris was selected based on merits, as Weigel and Dovere have. Just make sure you get back to the rest of us about what those merits could possibly be.
From the Washington Examiner
Biden didn’t pick Harris for an electoral boost, nor did he pick her for her political talent. Harris’s time in the national spotlight going back to 2019 has included embarrassing blunders such as suggesting rural people are incapable of using photocopiers and being unprepared for obvious questions about her few responsibilities as vice president. Harris is famous for her rambling word salad answers that make her sound like a broken artificial intelligence chatbot.
To top it all off, Harris is also a bad debater, despite the liberal media wish-casting that it would be her strength as a former prosecutor. Her 2020 presidential campaign was ended on the debate stage by Tulsi Gabbard, and she was batted away in future debates by both Democrats and then-Vice President Mike Pence.
To recap, Harris is a gaffe machine, is a poor debater, and has an unimpressive electoral history. She also has a terrible record with her own staff, including “low morale, porous lines of communication, and diminished trust among aides.” Axios even reported that she had to hold a “mock dinner” before a dinner with journalists because Harris is so inauthentic that she cannot even speak to dinner guests without rehearsing it.
So sure, you can go ahead and argue that Harris was selected based on merits, as Weigel and Dovere have. Just make sure you get back to the rest of us about what those merits could possibly be.
The important is the result...and for now there is a good mood/atmosphere/ energy in the place....her merit....TO DEFEAT THIS NARCISSISTIC/XENOPHOBE/AUTORITARIAN/MOSOGYNIST/CRIMINAL DUMMY.....that deserves lot of merit....lolllll.
This is pretty much it. Eventually all of this will be exposed. The Democrats just made a catastrophic blunder. Euphoria will wear off and reality will set in, that reality being she is a very bad candidate.
- Status
Similar threads
