Yes, Trump is a much better leader IF you define that as someone who is empty of any form of humanity, driven by cold-blooded megalomania without decency or compassion. He's a soulless egomaniac bereft of humanity.
I posted about this days ago. He scammed his way through loopholes to have his massive debts excused. Some short-sighted people want to call that smart business. But let's say you lead a country into that path. For him it cause his businesses to fail. Do the same to the country and there is no loophole to escape through.
370 Economists Pen Letter Denouncing Trump's Economic Policies
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/370-...ng-trumps-economic-policies/story?id=43244153
Saying that Donald Trump "has misled the electorate" and is "a dangerous, destructive choice for the country," a group of 370 economists have penned an open letter denouncing the Republican nominee and encouraging voters to choose another candidate.
The signatories, Nobel prize winners among them, did not endorse Hillary Clinton in the letter, but some were also involved in a separate open letter released earlier in the week that did make their endorsement explicit.
Trump has broken with traditional Republican economic ideology during the campaign and has embraced -- among other policies that diverge from traditional Republican orthodoxy -- a platform that is skeptical of free trade.
The letter, which was first published by the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, slammed the businessman-turned-politician for promoting "magical thinking and conspiracy theories over sober assessments of feasible economic policy options."
With one week until the election, the economists included a bullet-pointed list of criticisms directed at the Republican nominee, asserting that Trump had degraded "trust in vital public institutions that collect and disseminate information about the economy" like the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which releases jobs numbers.
They also derided Trump for claiming that renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) or slapping tariffs on Chinese imports would restore manufacturing jobs -- the loss of which, they said, was more the result of technological improvement than trade.
The letter also took issue with his fiscal policies, saying that he had "lowered the seriousness of the national dialogue" by proposing cuts that would not affect the budget deficit.