Montreal Escorts

What is the best recent movie you’ve seen.

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,211
4,758
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I’m sad & destroyed that you didn’t appreciate my review. :(
I was disappointed and devastated to hear that Soderbergh has ventured into horror films only to be given the most barebones details. This is the same guy who made Sex Lies and Videotape as a younger man, after all. I have an idea that it is a different kind of horror film but wanted to hear more about cast, filming style and location, ambience, etc., which can all be discussed without providing any spoilers.
 

Doc Holliday

Forever Horny
Sep 27, 2003
20,823
2,455
113
Canada
I was disappointed and devastated to hear that Soderbergh has ventured into horror films only to be given the most barebones details. This is the same guy who made Sex Lies and Videotape as a younger man, after all. I have an idea that it is a different kind of horror film but wanted to hear more about cast, filming style and location, ambience, etc., which can all be discussed without providing any spoilers.
If you want a better understanding of what the movie’s about just go to Wikipedia. You’ll actually get the entire movie explained to you if you wish. If you want to read well-written reviews of it just go to Rotten Tomatoes or use Google.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,211
4,758
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
If you want a better understanding of what the movie’s about just go to Wikipedia. You’ll actually get the entire movie explained to you if you wish. If you want to read well-written reviews of it just go to Rotten Tomatoes or use Google.
But then I get spoilers. I want the review mentioned above with no spoilers.
 

Johnny test

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2018
631
1,026
93
I really enjoyed it. It’s one of those smart horror thriller types of movies. After i watched it i was surprised to learn it was directed by Soderbergh.
Thanks for this, i'll probably give it a try this week-end, i, for one, appreciate your reviews :)
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,211
4,758
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
i, for one, appreciate your reviews :)
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate like 98% of Doc's reviews whether they be movies, TV shows, restaurants or escorts, and I have been reading them for almost 25 years, plus I have met the guy and actually really like him. It's just that this particular review was so lacking in movie review proteins that I felt like I had been punched in the face by the time I finished reading it. It was like going to a new burger restaurant, ordering their famous new burger, lifting up the bun, and not seeing any meat. It reminded me of those old "Where's The Beef?" Commercials. Anyone remember them?
I am going to guess that when he wrote the review Holliday was drinking and in a rascally mood. Like whomever prepared that burger in that commercial. It occurred to me that commercial may not have appeared in Canada, so you guys may not have seen it. But at the time it came out in 1984 it became nationally famous in the USA and was one reason for the rise of Wendy's hamburgers in the fast food world.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Johnny test

Johnny test

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2018
631
1,026
93
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate like 98%
Cool :) , to be honest i was a bit surprised by the fact that you seem really annoyed and a tiny bit aggressive. Especially since the board is probably more famous for "dick sucking reviews" than movies :)
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,211
4,758
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Cool :) , to be honest i was a bit surprised by the fact that you seem really annoyed and a tiny bit aggressive. Especially since the board is probably more famous for "dick sucking reviews" than movies :)
I was disappointed in the review, but aggressive would be the wrong word, see my post above yours for my true feelings. It was just a burger served with a clearly insufficient portion of meat, and that's not what we usually get served from Doc. He just needed a reminder is all.
 

gaby

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
11,777
8,365
113
Pour les FRANCOPHONES et âmes sensibles....j'ai regardé hier le dernier LELOUCH----suis un grand fan---intitulé FINALEMENT.....évidemment c'est du pur LELOUCH.....pas facile à suivre et déconcertant.....MAIS mon coup de coeur a été pour la chanson thème
intitulé aussi FINALEMENT.....interprété par KAM MERAD et BARBARA GRAVI....j'en ai encore des frissons....et l"écoute en boucle depuis hier.....pour les âmes sensibles avec un bon vécu....lol....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny test

Johnny test

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2018
631
1,026
93
So back to Presence then
First of all, it is a Steven Soderbergh filck, so if you're not familiar with his work (and you probably are even if you never heard his name), you should check it.
Soderbergh is first and foremost a director of photography, that's what he enjoys and it shows in his movies.
Also this isn't an horror film, if you're expecting "paranormal activity part 22 1/5" you will be disappointed.
The whole movie is shot in a "camera subjective" way (1st person perspective), so you follow everything through the "ghost" point of view.
As mentioned by @Doc Holliday It's mostly a story about the family that moves in the house and we follow their story, i wouldn't describe them as dysfunctional , let's just say each character have their own challenges and stories, and the movie is mostly about those stories from the ghost perspective.
It's a very short movie (less than 90 minutes) and it works way better this way.
Actors are quite good and the story flows.
Again, It's more of a "tranche de vie" than an horror film, of course things happen during those 90 minutes or there wouldn't be a movie.
is it the best Soderbergh? probably not, but it's very entertaining and it deserves better then the current 6.2 on IMDB.
So watch it and let us know.
 
Last edited:

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,211
4,758
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
So back to Presence then
First of all, it is a Steven Soderbergh filck, so if you're not familiar with his work (and you probably are even if you never heard his name), you should check it.
Soderbergh is first and foremost a director of photography, that's what he enjoys and it shows in his movies.
Also this isn't an horror film, if you're expecting "paranormal activity paert 22 1/5" you will be disappointed.
The whole movie is shot in a "camera subjective" way (1st person perspective), so you follow everything through the "ghost" point of view.
As mentioned by @Doc Holliday It's mostly a story about the family that moves in the house and we follow their story, i wouldn't describe them as dysfunctional , let's just say each character have their own challenges and stories, and the movie is mostly about those stories from the ghost perspective.
It's a very short movie (less than 90 minutes) and it works way better this way.
Actors are quite good and the story flows.
Again, It's more of a "tranche de vie" than an horror film, of course things happen during those 90 minutes or there wouldn't be a movie.
is it the best Soderbergh? probably not, but it's very entertaining and it deserves better then the current 6.2 on IMDB.
So watch it and let us know.
Excellent review Johnny! A beefy burger!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Johnny test

charmer_

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2010
1,482
434
83
I was disappointed in the review, but aggressive would be the wrong word, see my post above yours for my true feelings. It was just a burger served with a clearly insufficient portion of meat, and that's not what we usually get served from Doc. He just needed a reminder is all.
I'm not sure if @EagerBeaver is trolling/joking, or is actually being serious lol.

Plenty of sources with no spoilers. Or better yet, just WATCH THE MOVIE lol.

I'm a big fan of Soderbergh as well, but heard mixed reviews for Presence. Critics seem to like it (88% on RT), but audiences do not (52% on RT).

I'll probably check it out eventually. And yes, I do appreciate @Doc Holliday's reviews as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc Holliday

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,211
4,758
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Or better yet, just WATCH THE MOVIE lol.
I cant find it online anywhere for free so I am not sure exactly where you guys are watching it or seeing it available. According to JustWatch, it's streaming on AppleTV for $9.99, same on Amazon Video but leaving in 7 days, same on Prime, and same on Fandango. All are offering it for an extra $9.99 rental fee.
I generally do not spend extra money to rent movies online, I just watch whatever is offered on the service I am already paying monthly for, rather than be double-whammied. I am assuming you guys are paying double- for the monthly service and then for the rental fee or "on demand" charge on top of the monthly service charge. For a 52% RT rating film, that is really a tough sell with me. I might lose 90 minutes of my life. I do not like spending money for movies when I felt that way after finishing the film. Because you do not get that 90 minutes back, ever.
 
Last edited:

Johnny test

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2018
631
1,026
93
millenium.jpg

Last week i watched the original Millenium Trilogy Män som hatar kvinnor, so the 1st version with Noomi Rapace.
Not exactly a new movie but if you've only watched the Fincher adaptation of the same book with Daniel Craig, you should give this one a try.
Most of the commentaries on IMDB tend to say the 2 versions are eaqually good and i disagree, the Swedish one is very superior in my opinion in the sense that you really feel the movie while watching it if that makes sense, you really feel the cold in the first part and i was really engaged in the investigation of this strange cold case (in every sense of the word).
Fincher's was good, because well Fincher :) buta bit more watered down, especially if you compare it to Se7en or even Zodiac.
The other 2 movies of the trilogy are interesting (Michael Nyqvist and Noomi Rapace help a lot) but not nearly as good as the first one, my understanding it that it was the same for the books.
So if you can find it, give it a try
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc Holliday

Halloween Mike

The Shape
Apr 19, 2009
5,989
3,033
113
Haddonfield
I watched Heart Eyes a couple days ago. I had high hope for that one. Sadly its not that great. There is a good ammount of violence and blood, but the script and structure of the movie is pretty weak. It tries to be too many different things and can't succeed fully at any. Still watchable once, but thats about it.
 

Doc Holliday

Forever Horny
Sep 27, 2003
20,823
2,455
113
Canada
I'm not sure if @EagerBeaver is trolling/joking, or is actually being serious lol.

Plenty of sources with no spoilers. Or better yet, just WATCH THE MOVIE lol.

I'm a big fan of Soderbergh as well, but heard mixed reviews for Presence. Critics seem to like it (88% on RT), but audiences do not (52% on RT).

I'll probably check it out eventually. And yes, I do appreciate @Doc Holliday's reviews as well.
I believe that the 52% rating by the fans is somewhat misleading since i don’t believe they fully understood it or appreciate good filmaking of they didn’t rate it higher. Personally i always follow a movie on wikipedia while i’m watching it in order not to miss anything. If i hadn’t done this while watching PRESENCE i would have missed a lot of hints & likely wouldn’t have enjoyed it as much as i did.

By the way i’m aware that my review of this movie wasn’t appreciated by everyone however i find it difficult or even time consuming to write extensive reviews of movies that have already been reviewed dozens of times & if someone is really interested in reading an indepth review it’s incredibly easy just to look it up on the web. I fimd that the pirpose of this thread os to state which movie you recently watched, write a very brief review of what it’s about, your personal impressions & whether or not you’d recommend it to others withoit divulging too much of the plotline & risk spoiling for others who hadn’t seen a particular movie yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charmer_