Hello Banger,
The other poll favored cutting back expenses by spending less or cutting hours heavily, by nearly 3-1. That would indicate the need for agencies to hold, cut rates, or offer specials. So if the agencies were skewing the vote I don't see how they achieved anything in their interest. But it is "unique" to have someone vote for conflicting answers like Rumples. Maybe you can explain that one...lol.
Voting publicly caused me to think about the consequences more. Did that skew how I voted? Well, the option I would prefer is not offered so I voted more conservatively than the last time.
I always tip something whenever I am reasonably satisfied with the meeting, and that means I tip 95% of the time. As for my vote, I had already cut back the time and expenses with SPs by half last year. So my cutting back even more this year should be viewed with that in mind.
Cheers,
Korbel