Last week, there was a road rage shooting near where I live. The genius opened fire on another car and hit the driver in plain view of a cop in a regular car. No, not an unmarked cop car, but the typical cop car with lights.^^^^^
What you suggest is paradoxical, if civilians cannot be trusted with guns what makes you think the government can be. What happened in Uvalde justifies citizens being armed. To put your life in the faith of police means you do not value your own life much or are seriously misguided about guns. People kill people, not guns. A gun is merely a tool like any other. A hundred years ago gun laws were not much lax but mass shootings were unheard off, so what changed? Explain this I bet you cannot. There is something else going on and it is not about guns. Progressives are just politically hijacking this to push their own agenda. Many other countries also protect the right to bear arms, so where are the mass shootings in those countries? I also bet you cannot answer this one. And one last thing, you also are misguided in thinking if more strict gun laws will do anything because it will not. Criminals do not follow the law, whenever there is prohibition the black market will fulfill those needs. And if you think mentally ill people will not be able to get a hold of guns, I suggest you think long and hard about that one because otherwise prohibition would have stopped all those regular people from getting heroin and fentanyl. The USA is one of the most Capitalistic countries in the world where the mighty dollar drives everything, a black market will always fulfill the needs where there is prohibition, I guarantee it.
I recount that story to say at this point if you think the verdict is not in on whether civilians can be trusted with guns--in between the road rage shootings, daily handgun shootings that claim more lives than mass shootings, and of course mass shootings--there is really nothing else to say. I mean, the lights are on but clearly no one is home.
If you truly think "if it's good enough for the government, then it's good enough for regular citizens" is an airtight argument, then we need to be handing out fully automatic weapons, tanks and drones to everyone too[/sarcasm]
(I shouldn't even have to say this but fully automatic weapons are illegal to possess for most people. Although the damage that can be inflicted by regularly available semiautomatic and fully automatic guns is a distinction without a difference these days, even our gun happy government/system thinks allowing any citizen to own fully automatic weapons is a fucking terrible idea).
I'll sort of agree with you on one point. If we ever get to the point where guns are banned (hint: we won't) criminals won't follow the law and turn their guns in. But that's exactly why they are criminals: they don't follow the law. If we start crafting laws that only criminals will follow, then there would be no laws. Guns owned by criminals here is only a problem here because we have a lot of it. In countries where the number of circulated guns are low, like Japan, unlawful possession of a gun and being caught with is a big deal.
Even gangsters live in fear of Japan's gun laws
It's almost impossible to get to a gun in Japan, and selling one or owning one is a serious crime. Fire the gun? Possibly life imprisonment. Gun-control laws are taken so seriously that police will pursue a violator all the way to the grave — and maybe beyond.
But the gun black market is only as active as the above-board market. And because it's so easy to buy a gun here, those guns invariably feed the black market as well. For example, many guns used by Mexican drug cartels were legally sold in the US. It doesn't matter that straw purchases are illegal here. Sometimes, you don't even need to do a straw purchase. Because guns are so widespread, many criminals can steal them by breaking into people's cars.
So I don't doubt criminals can buy guns where guns are heavily restricted, but it's a lot harder compared to a country where it's easy to buy a gun and a glut of guns are already in circulation like here in the US.




